Development of Tomotherapy couch device capable of yaw-directional correction

Yaw방향의 보정이 가능한 Tomotherapy couch device의 개발

  • Chae, Moon Ki (Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Kwon, Dong Yeol (Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Sun, Jong Lyool (Dept. of Radiation, Daejeon Health Institute Of Technology) ;
  • Choi, Byung Ki (Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center)
  • 채문기 (삼성서울병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 권동열 (삼성서울병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 선종률 (대전보건대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 최병기 (삼성서울병원 방사선종양학과)
  • Published : 2018.12.29

Abstract

Objectives : A self-made "Tomotherapy couch device" capable of correcting the Yaw direction was fabricated and evaluated for its usefulness. Materials and Methods : "Tomotherapy couch device" capable of correcting the Yaw direction is made of rigid fibreboard with a flexural strength of $200kg/cm^2$. CBCT Image from Novalis Tx and Iso-Align Phantom from MED-TEC were used to evaluate the physical accuracy. The treatment plan was designed using Accuray $Precision^{TM}$ and In House Head and Phantom. Accuray $PrecisionART^{TM}$ and $Precision^{TM}$ was used to evaluate dose. Results : Evaluation results, the self-fabricated device accurately corrected the setup error, Target dose was within 95 %~107 % of all. In order to directly evaluate the OAR dose according to the Yaw change, the absolute dose was measured. As a result, when the error in the Yaw direction was $3^{\circ}$, the specific OAR showed a maximum difference of 18.4 %. Conclusion : "Tomotherapy couch device" capable of correcting the Yaw direction can be manufactured at a lower cost compared to the effect, and it can prevent the patient's MVCT image dose for re-imaging. Accurate radiation therapy without errors can be performed.

목 적 : "Yaw방향의 보정이 가능한 Tomotherapy couch device"를 자체 제작하였고, 그 유용성을 평가하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 휨 강도가 $200kg/cm^2$의 경질 섬유판 재질로 Yaw방향의 회전 가능한 Tomotherapy couch device를 제작하고, 제작된 device의 물리적 정확성을 판단하기 위해 Varian사의 Novalis Tx의 CBCT Image와 MED-TEC사의 Iso-Align Phantom을 사용하여 device의 Yaw방향의 보정각도의 정확성을 측정하였고, Tomotherapy HDA에서의 치료를 위해 치료계획은 Accuray PrecisionTM를 이용하여 In House Head and Phantom 위에 치료계획을 설계하였고 제작한 device의 보정각도마다 치료 전 후의 MVCT의 adaptive plan을 Accuray PrecisionARTTM and PrecisionTM을 사용하여 선량을 평가하였다. 결 과 : Yaw방향의 보정이 가능한 Tomotherapy couch device를 자체 제작하였으며, 물리적 정확성의 측면에서 모든 각도별 vertical, lateral, longitudinal의 보정값은 약 1 mm 내외였고, 최대 보정값이 1.5 mm를 넘지 않았으며 Yaw방향의 보정은 최대 0.12도 오차 이내의 범위 안에 들어왔다. 치료후의 MVCT촬영 영상을 이용한 adaptive plan을 이용한 선량 평가에서도 모든 각도실험에서 target은 D95=Prescription dose를 만족하고, target내 선량이 95 %~107 % 이내에 들어왔으며, OAR 또한 본원에서 평가한 SMC Head and Neck tolerance dose 영역 내에 모두 들어왔다. 결 론 : 자체 제작한 "Yaw방향의 보정이 가능한 Tomotherapy couch device는 Tomotherapy의 치료에서 Yaw방향의 set-up 오차를 정확히 보정해준다. 비용적인 측면에서도 효과대비 저비용으로 장치를 만들 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 재촬영에 대한 환자가 받는 MVCT image dose를 방지하고 시간적으로도 환자의 회전율을 상승시킬 수 있으며, Yaw방향의 set up 오차를 보정하므로 더 정확한 방사선치료를 시행할 수 있다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. E. T. Chang and H. Adami, "The enigmatic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma," Cancer Epidemiology, iomarkers & Prevention, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1765-1777, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0353
  2. Q. Zhou, Y. He, Y. Zhao, Y. Wang, W. Kuang, and L. Shen, "A study of 358 cases of locally advanced asopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy: improving the seventh edition of the merican joint committee on cancer T-staging system," BioMed Research International, vol. 2017, Article ID 1419676, 11 pages, 2017
  3. T. J.Wang,N. Riaz, S. K.Cheng, J. J. Lu, andN.Y. Lee, "Intensitymodulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal arcinoma: a review," Journal of Radiation Oncology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 129-146, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-012-0020-4
  4. K. Ekici, E. K. Pepele, B. Yaprak et al., "Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, intensitymodulated adiation therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and 3-dimensional conformal therapy for the treatment of T1N0 glottic cancer," Medical Dosimetry, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 329-333, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2016.08.002
  5. J. Gomez-Millan, J. R. Fernandez, and J. A. M. Carmona, "Current status of IMRT in head and neck cancer," Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 371-375, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2013.09.008
  6. Z. Taheri-Kadkhoda, T. Bjork-Eriksson, S. Nill et al., "Intensitymodulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a comparative treatment planning study of photons and protons," Journal of Radiation Oncology, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 4, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-3-4
  7. Y. He, Y.Wang, L. Shen et al., "Prognostic value of the distance between the primary tumor and brainstem in the patients with BioMed Research International 7 locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma," BMC Cancer, vol. 16, article 114, 2016
  8. M. Teoh, C. H. Clark, K. Wood, S. Whitaker, and A. Nisbet, "Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice," British Journal of Radiology, vol. 84, no. 1007, pp. 967-996, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/22373346
  9. E. Vanetti, A. Clivio, and G. Nicolini, "Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypopharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT," Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 111-117, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.008
  10. J. Gao, T.-L. Qian, C.-Z. Tao et al., "SmartArc-based volumetric modulated arc therapy can improve the middle ear, vestibule and cochlea sparing for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with step-and-shoot intensitymodulated radiotherapy," British Journal of Radiology, vol. 88, no. 1053, Article ID 20150052, 2015