Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society

Korean Data Analysis Society (한국자료분석학회)
권호 표지

The Effect of Market·Technology Orientation on Firm Performance of Southeast Region Manufacturing Company : Focusing on the Dynamic Capacities for SCM

시장·기술지향성이 동남권 제조기업의 성과에 미치는 영향 : 전략적 공급사슬관리를 위한 동적역량의 매개효과를 중심으로

  • Kwon, Hoi Soon (Interdisciplinary Program of Management of Technology, Graduate School, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Hwang, Sang Don (ICT Convergence Corporation, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Lee, Woon-Seek (Division of System Management and Engineering, Pukyong National University)
  • 권회순 (부경대학교 대학원 기술경영협동과정) ;
  • 황상돈 (부경대학교) ;
  • 이운식 (부경대학교 시스템경영공학부)
  • Received : 2018.11.20
  • Accepted : 2018.12.20
  • Published : 2018.12.31

⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study is to find out the direction and strategies of dynamic capacity utilization for the strategic supply chain management (SCM), which is an innovative means for enhancing the efficiency of the firm, and to create an optimal management environment for the competitiveness of firms. The market and technology will be able to generate higher business performance when adapting the strategic direction and culture to the formal dynamic capacities possessed by the firm and reflecting the technology related to the dynamic capacities for the strategic SCM in the process. In this study, we empirically analyze the effect of market and technology orientations on the firm performance and how dynamic capacities affects firm performance. The results of this study show that market and technology orientations have positive effects on dynamic capacities and dynamic capacities have positive effect on firm performance. In addition, it is proved that dynamic capacities mediated the relationship between market orientation, technology orientation, and firm performance.

본 연구에서는 기업 경쟁력의 제고를 통하여 최적화된 경영환경을 조성하고, 기업의 효율성을 높이는데 필요한 혁신 수단인 공급사슬관리를 위한 동적역량의 활용 방향성과 전략을 찾을 수 있는 방안들에 대해 알아보고자 한다. 시장과 기술은 전략적 방향과 문화로 기업이 보유한 정형화된 동적역량에 맞추고, 프로세스에는 공급사슬관리를 위한 동적역량과 관련된 기술을 반영하여 활용할 때에 보다 높은 기업성과를 창출할 수 있을 것이다. 본 연구에서는 시장지향성과 기술지향성이 기업성과에 미치는 영향과 동적역량이 기업성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 실증적으로 분석하는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구 결과는 시장지향성과 기술지향성은 동적역량에 긍정적 영향을 미치고, 동적역량은 기업성과에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 즉 동적역량은 시장지향성, 기술지향성과 기업성과 간의 관계를 매개하는 것으로 검증되었으며, 동적역량의 매개효과로 기업의 시장지향성과 기술지향성이 기업성과에 중요한 영향을 미치는 것으로 실증 분석되었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 부경대학교

References

  1. Atuahene-Gima, K. (1996). Market orientation and innovation, Journal of Business Research, 35(2), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00051-8
  2. Bayus, B. L., Erickson, G., Jacobson, R. (2003). The financial rewards of new product introductions in the personal computer industry, Management Science, 49(2), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.2.197.12741
  3. Challaglla, G. N., Shervani, T. A. (1996). Dimensions and types of supervisory control: effects on sale person performance and satisfaction, Journal of Marketing, 60(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251890
  4. Ching, H. Y., Hsu, T. T. (2006). The impact of dynamic capabilities with market orientation and resource-based approaches on NPD project performance, The Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(1), 215-229.
  5. Christopher, M., Gattorna, J. (2005). Supply chain cost management and value-based pricing, Industrial Marketing Management, 34(2), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.07.016
  6. Chung, L. K., Hong, J. B. (2018). An empirical study on the relationship between investment and employment growth focusing on difference between SMEs and large companies, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 20(3), 1293-1302. (in Korean).
  7. Cooper, R. G. (1984). The strategy performance link in product innovation, R&D Management, 14(8), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1984.tb00521.x
  8. Cummings, A., Oldham, G. R. (1997). Enhancing creativity: managing work contexts for the high potential employee, California Management Review, 40(1), 22-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165920
  9. Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market driven organizations, Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800404
  10. Gatignon, H., Xuereb, M. M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance, Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400107
  11. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., William, C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, englewood cliffs, NJ: printice hall, 577-664.
  12. Han, N. Y., Hong, J. B. (2016). Impact of social capital and partners characteristics on the performance of joint technology development, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 18(1B), 305-318. (in Korean).
  13. Han, J. K., Kim, N. W., Rajendra, K. S. (1998). Market orientation and organization performance: Is innovation a missing link?, Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200403
  14. Harris, R. G., Mowery, D. C. (1990). Strategies for innovation: an overview, California Management Review, 32(3), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166624
  15. Hayes, R. H., Pisano, G. P. (1996). Manufacturing strategy: at the intersection of two paradigm shifts, Production and Operations Management, 5(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.1996.tb00383.x
  16. Helfat, C. E., Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource based view: capability lifecycles, Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
  17. Hong, J. P., Kim, E. Y. (2009). Sectoral patterns of technological innovation in Korean manufacturing sector, Journal of Technology Innovation, 17(2), 25-53. (in Korean).
  18. Hwang, S. D. (2017). The effects of strategic orientation on the technology innovation performances: Focusing on the mediation effect of dynamic and convergence capabilities, Ph.D. Thesis, Pukyong National University, 1-148. (in Korean).
  19. Hwang, S. D., Lee, W. S. (2016). The effects of strategic orientation on the technology innovation performances: mediation effect of convergence capabilities, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 18(3), 1451-1469. (in Korean).
  20. Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F. (1998). Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? an analysis of customer satisfaction, Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 1-35.
  21. Jeong, I., Pae, J. H., Zhou, D. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of the strategic orientations in new product development: The case of chinese manufacturers, Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 348-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.06.010
  22. Kang, H. C. (2013). Discussions on the suitable interpretation of model fit indices and the strategies to fit model in structural equation modeling, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 15(2B), 653-668. (in Korean).
  23. Kang, D. K., Park, S. Y. (2007). The meaning of technology orientation and the study on the effect of technology orientation on performances, Journal of Commodity Science and Technology, 25, 11-26. (in Korean).
  24. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. (1996). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy, California Management Review, 39(1), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165876
  25. Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance, Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.2.24.60761
  26. Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications, Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400301
  27. Kwon, H. S. (2018). The effect of market.technology orientation on firm performance of southeast region manufacturing company : focusing on the dynamic capacities for SCM, Master Degree Thesis, Pukyong National University, 1-98. (in Korean).
  28. Langerak, F. (2003). The effect of market orientation on positional advantage and organizational performance, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11(2), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254032000102957
  29. Luca, L. M. D., Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Market knowledge dimensions and cross functional collaboration: examining the different routes to product innovation performance, Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.1.95
  30. Lyon, D. W., Ferrier, W. J. (2002). Enhancing performance with product-market innovation: The influence of the top management team, Journal of Managerial Issues, 452-469.
  31. Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability, The Journal of Marketing, 20-35.
  32. Newbert, S. L. (2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual level empirical investigation of the resource based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 745-768. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.686
  33. Niehoff, B. P., Enz, C. A., Grover, R. A. (1990). The impact of top-management actions on employee attitudes and perceptions, Group & Organization Management, 15(3), 337-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960119001500307
  34. Pavlou, P. A., El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities, Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x
  35. Pelham, A. M., Wilson, D. T. (1996). A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimension of small firm performance, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893935
  36. Tsai, M. T., Shih, C. M. (2004). The impact of marketing knowledge among managers on marketing capabilities and business performance, International Journal of Management, 21(4), 524.
  37. Vorhies, D. W. (1998). An investigation of the factors leading to the development of marketing capabilities and organizational effectiveness, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/096525498346676
  38. Wang, C. H., Lu, I. Y., Chen, C. B. (2008). Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty, Technovation, 28(6), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.007