DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation Criteria for Student-Centered University Education Programs

  • Lim, Hong-Tak (Graduate School of Science & Technology Policy Pukyung University)
  • Received : 2018.08.13
  • Accepted : 2018.09.19
  • Published : 2018.09.28

Abstract

A new breed of universities equipped with student-centered education programs and advanced digital technologies is changing the face of higher education. "Flipped learning" is heralded as a new model of education, yet its effect is underexplored. The purpose of this study is to provide evaluation criteria to assess and understand the merit of student-centered education programs and apply them to actual cases. Discussion on the nature of knowledge, its production mechanism and system, and possible contribution of digital technology to user-centered programs are discussed to produce five key criteria; initiative of students, interaction in class, interaction in field, customization of courses, and automated personal service. They are applied to evaluation of Minerva and Ecole 42.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Y. Chung, Education Policy Agenda for Future Information Society, Korea Association of Education Academy, 2016.
  2. B. H. Sohn, J. H. Kim, and D. H. Choi, S&T Ageda for the 4th Industrial Revolution, KISTEP Issue Paper 2017-4, KISTEP, 2017.
  3. UNIST CTL, UNIST Flipped Learning Guidebook, 2016.
  4. M. Balconi, S. Brusoni, and L. Orsenigo, "In defence of the linear model: An essay," Research Policy, vol. 39, no. 1, 2010. pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.013
  5. M. Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension, Anchor Books, 1967.
  6. M. B. Jensen, B. Johnson, E. Lorenz, and B.A. Lundvall, "Forms of Knowledge and modes of innovation," Research Policy, vol. 36, 2007, pp. 680-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
  7. B. A. Lundvall, "Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation," In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Frances Pinter, 1988.
  8. J. D. Bernal, The Social Function of Science, Routledge, 1939.
  9. M. Gibbons, H. Nowonty, C. Limoges, M. Trow, S. Schwartzman, and P. Scott, The New Production of Knowledge, SAGE Publications, 1994.
  10. C. Nowotny, P. Scott, and M. Gibbons, Rethinking Science, Polity, 2001.
  11. H. T. Lim and J. W. Han, "A User-centred Classification Framework for Digital Service Innovation: Case for Elderly Care Service," International Journal of Contents, vol. 14, no. 1, 2018, pp. 7-11. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJOC.2018.14.1.007
  12. J. Gray, "Jim Gray on eScience: A Transformed Scientific Method," In T. Hey, S. Tansley, and K. Tolle(eds), The Fourth Paradigm: Data-intensive Scientific Discovery, Redmond, Washington: Microsoft Research, 2009.
  13. R. Amit and C. Zott, "Value Creation in E-Business," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, 2001, pp. 493-520. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.187
  14. W. B. Arthur, "The Second Economy," McKinsey Quarterly, issue 4, 2011, pp. 90-99.
  15. Digieco, Future University of Entrepreneurship, Digieco report, 2016.
  16. Minerva School at KGI, https://www.minerva.kgi.edu/about/
  17. Joongang Daily Newspaper, "Icon of Innovation, Minerva," 2017.1.15. news.joins.com/article/21123862
  18. Active Learning Forum: A New Way to Learn (full length), youtu.be/Gk5iiXqh7Tg
  19. S. Y. Joo, Innovative University, more difficult to get in than Harvard, Chosun Daily Newspaper, 2017.7.25. http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2017/07/24/2017072401844.html
  20. KDI Finance and Economics Research Group, Report on Retry and Start-up Policy in France, Business Trip Report, 2016.
  21. 42 : une formation unique et une pedagogie revolutionnaire, www.42.fr
  22. H. R. Yoon, "French Youth Strat-up: Come to Ecole 42 no tuition fee," KOTRA Foreign Market News, 2015.2.27. https://news.kotra.or.kr/user/globalBbs/kotranews/4/globalBbsDataView.do?setIdx=243&dataIdx=140940
  23. J. Y. Lee, "At Ecole 42, French Start-up Academy," Maeil Business News Korea, 2015.2.2.
  24. E. Von Hippel, Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, 2005.
  25. S. L. Vargo and R. F. Lusch, "Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing," Journal of Marketing, vol. 68, 2004, pp. 1-17.