DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design and Implementation of an OPAC Prototype based on FRBR Model

FRBR 기반의 OPAC 프로토타입 개발에 관한 연구

  • 이은주 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2018.05.19
  • Accepted : 2018.06.18
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

This study intends to implement an OPAC prototype based on FRBR(Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) model, which are reflected the users' information needs and search behavior. To the end, this study applies prototyping techniques that design, evaluate and improve an early sample model. Included in this study are as follows: (1) design a conceptual model of new OPACs based on the users' information needs about FRBR-based search services, (2) implement a FRBR-based prototype with WordPress 4.2 version, (3) evaluate the FRBR-based prototype from the viewpoint of users and experts(catalogers and professors). 50 college students and 6 experts participate in the final evaluation process.

이 연구의 목적은 우리 이용자의 요구와 행태에 기반 한 FRBR 기반 OPAC 프로토타입을 실험적으로 구현해 보는데 있다. 이러한 목적을 위해 이 연구에서는 시스템 개발방법 중 사용자의 요구사항이 민감하게 반영되어야 할 경우 활용할 수 있는 방법인 프로토타이핑(prototyping) 기법을 적용하여 연구를 수행하였다. 구체적으로, 이 연구에서는 (1) 국외 FRBR형 검색서비스에 대한 이용자 선호도 평가결과를 토대로 하여 프로토타입의 논리적 구조를 설계하고, (2) 설계한 논리적 구조에 따라 FRBR 기반 프로토타입을 물리적으로 개발한 다음, (3) 프로토타입에 대한 이용자 만족도 평가를 실시하였다. 이 때, 만족도 평가는 대학생 50명과 전문가 6명을 대상으로 수행하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Kim, Jeong-Hyen. 2013. "A Study on the Direction for the Revision of Korean Cataloguing Rules." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(4): 123-143.
  2. Rho, Jee-Hyun. 2007. "Meanings of FRBR Model in Korean Library Circumstance." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(2): 223-244.
  3. Rho, Jee-Hyun. 2008. "An Application of FRBR Model to KORMARC Records." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(2): 291-312. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.2.200806.291
  4. Park, Zi-young. 2017. "Expanding and Improving FRBR Conceptual Model through FRBRoo." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(4):201-225. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.4.201
  5. Park, Jin-Hee. 2009. "Comparative Analysis on Descriptive Rules of RDA and KCR4." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(2):111-138. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.2.200906.111
  6. Seo, EunGyong. 2006. "A Study on the Development of Bibliographic Interface Based on the FRBR Model." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(4): 317-339. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.317
  7. Yoon, SoYoung. Ziyoung Park, and Hyewon Lee. 2017. "Organizing Bibliographic Information of Korean Classic Materials Using FRBR Library Reference Model." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 51(2): 49-71. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2017.51.1.049
  8. Lee, Mihwa. 2012. "The Study on the Directions of KCR4 under the New ICP 2009." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(2):261-280. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.2.261
  9. Lee, Mihwa. 2016. "A Study on the Display Considerations of RDA Resource Type." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(1): 33-52. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.033
  10. Lee, Sung-Sook. 2003. "A Study on IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Model." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 37(2), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2003.37.2.319
  11. Lee, Sung-Sook. 2006. "A Study on the Application Strategies of the FRBR Model: Focused on Foreign Countries." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(3): 305-331. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.3.305
  12. Lee. Sung-Sook. 2017. "Change in the Key Concept of Conceptual Model Centering on IFLA LRM." Journal of Social Science, 28(4): 305-324. https://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2017.10.28.4.305
  13. Lee, Eun-Ju. 2016. "Analysis of User Preferences for Developing FRBR-Based Information Search Services." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2): 259-286. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.2.201606.259
  14. Lee, Eun-Ju and Jae-Whoan Lee. 2012. "Meanings of Library Catalog in Learning Activities of Korean College Students." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3): 49-77. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.49
  15. 정대율 외. 2007. 정보시스템 분석 및 설계. 서울: 컴원미디어.
  16. Dervin, B. 1976. "Strategies for Dealing with Human Information Needs: Information or Communication?" Journal of Broadcasting, 20(3): 324-333.
  17. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report, 1997. [cited 2017. 3. 18](김태수 역. 서지레코드의 기능상의 요건: 최종보고서. 국립중앙도서관).
  18. Hoffman, Gretchen L. 2009. "Meeting users' needs in cataloging: What is the right thing to do?" Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(7): 631-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370903111999
  19. Maki, Uskali. 2001. "Models, Metaphors, Narrative, and Rhetoric: Philosophical Aspects." in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  20. Mercun, Tanja, Maja Zumer and Trond Aalberg. 2017 "Presenting Bibliographic Families Using Information Visualization; Evaluation of FRBR-Based Prototype and Hierarchical Visualizations." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2): 392-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23659
  21. Nielsen, Jakob. 1993. Usability Engineering, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
  22. Valacich, Joseph S., Joey F. George and Jeffrey A. Hoffer. 2013. 시스템 분석 및 설계. 서우종, 홍태호 공역. 파주: 생능출판사.
  23. Zhanga, Yin and Athena Salaba. 2012. "What Do Users Tell Us about FRBR-Based Catalogs?" Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7): 705-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682000