References
- Kang, A., & Lee, G. (2006). A Generalizability Theory Approach to Investigating the Generalizability of Performance Assessment Using Student Peer Reviews. Journal of Education Evaluation 19(3), 107-121.
- Kim, J. H., & Jo, Y. M. (2006). Effects of Evaluation Types according to Learning Styles on Students' Mathematical Disposition and Problem-solving Ability, Journal of Education Evaluation 19(2), 21-39.
- Bae, S. J., & Park, J. Y. (2016). The validity of using cumulative peer assessed scores for final grades in college courses, Korean Journal of Cognitive Science 27(2), 221-245. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2016.27.2.002
- Shin, J. H. (2014). Study on Formative Peer Review of Teaching Program in Higher Education, Journal of Korean Teacher Education 31(3), 371-398. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2014.31.3.371
- Korean Society for Educational Evaluation (2004). Educational evaluation thesaurus, Seoul: Hakjisa.
- Brown, D. E. & Michel, S. (2010). Assessing proofs with rubrics: the RVF method, In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Raleigh, NC. Retrieved from http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/crume2010/Archive/Brown_D.pdf.
- Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (1990). Quantitative data analysis for social scientists, Taylor & Frances: Routledge.
- Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives, Journal of Educational Psychology 98(4), 891-901. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891
- Cho, K. & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system, Computers & Education 48(3), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education, New York: Routledge.
- Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
- Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review, Studies in Higher Education 24(3), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
- Gaillet, L. L. (1992). A Foreshadowing of Modern Theories and Practices of Collaborative Learning: The Work of Scottish Rhetorician George Jardine. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Cincinnati, OH.
- Harel, G. & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof, Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Greenwich: Information Age.
- Hunter, D. & Russ, M. (1996). Peer assessment in performance studies, British Journal of Music Education 13, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051700002953
- Jeffery, D., Yankulov, K., Crerar, A., & Ritchie, K. (2016). How to achieve accurate peer assessment for high value written assignments in a senior undergraduate course, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41(1), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.987721
- Johnson, R., Penny, J., Gordon, B., Shumate, S., & Fisher, S. (2005). Resolving Score Differences in the Rating of Writing Samples: Does Discussion Improve the Accuracy of Scores? Language Assessment Quarterly 2(2), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0202_2
- Lavy, I. & Shriki, A. (2014). Engaging prospective teachers in peer assessment as both assessors and assessees: The case of geometrical proofs. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/lavy2.pdf
- Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Kornhaber, M. L., Lyu, Y., Chung K. S., & Suen, H. K. (2016). Peer assessment in the digital age: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41(2), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.999746
- Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof, Educational Studies in Mathematics 27(3), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273731
- Moore, R. C. (2016). Mathematics professors' evaluation of students' proofs: A complex teaching practice, International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education 2(2), 246-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0029-y
- Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
- O'Donnell, A. M. & Topping, K. J. (1998). Peers assessing peers: Possibilities and problems. In K. J. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds), Peer-assisted learning (255-278). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2000). The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930050025006
- Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort, Studies in Educational Evaluation 39(4), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005
- Park, J. (2017). ClassPrep: A peer review system for class preparation, British Journal of Educational Technology 48(2), 511-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12390
- Santos, J. R. A. (1999). Cronbach's alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales, Journal of extension 37(2), 1-5.
- Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Tutoring and students with special needs. In K. J. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (165-182). Mahwahm NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Smith, J. C. (2006). A sense-making approach to proof: Strategies of students in traditional and problem-based number theory courses, Journal of Mathematical Behavior 25, 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.11.005
- Smith, J. C., Nichols, S. R., Yoo, S., & Oehler, K. (2009). Building a community of inquiry in a problem-based undergraduate number theory course. In D. A. Stylianou, M. L. Blanton, & E. J. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective. New York: Routledge.
- Stefani, L. A. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities, Studies in Higher Education 19(1), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382153
- Stylianou, D. A., Blanton, M. L., & Knuth, E. J. (2009). Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective. New York: Routledge.
- Taylor, P. J. (2010). An introduction to intraclass correlation that resolves some common confusions. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Boston, USA. Retrieved from http://www.faculty.umb.edu/peter_taylor/09b.pdf.
- Topping, J. K. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice 48(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
- Topping, J. K. & Ehly, S. (1998). Peer assisted learning, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Topping, J. K., Smith, F. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25(2), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611428
- Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge, Educational studies in mathematics 48(1), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015535614355
- Weber, K., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2014). Mathematics majors' beliefs about proof reading International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 45(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.790514