DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical investigation of a novel device for bubble generation to reduce ship drag

  • Zhang, Jun (College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics) ;
  • Yang, Shuo (College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics) ;
  • Liu, Jing (Energy Research Institute @NTU, Nanyang Technological University)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.10
  • 심사 : 2017.10.24
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30

초록

For a sailing ship, the frictional resistance exerted on the hull of ship is due to viscous effect of the fluid flow, which is proportional to the wetted area of the hull and moving speed of ship. This resistance can be reduced through air bubble lubrication to the hull. The traditional way of introducing air to the wetted hull consumes extra energy to retain stability of air layer or bubbles. It leads to lower reduction rate of the net frictional resistance. In the present paper, a novel air bubble lubrication technique proposed by Kumagai et al. (2014), the Winged Air Induction Pipe (WAIP) device with opening hole on the upper surface of the hydrofoil is numerically investigated. This device is able to naturally introduce air to be sandwiched between the wetted hull and water. Propulsion system efficiency can be therefore increased by employing the WAIP device to reduce frictional drag. In order to maximize the device performance and explore the underlying physics, parametric study is carried out numerically. Effects of submerged depth of the hydrofoil and properties of the opening holes on the upper surface of the hydrofoil are investigated. The results show that more holes are favourable to reduce frictional drag. 62.85% can be achieved by applying 4 number of holes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Afkhami, S., Renardy, Y., 2013. A volume-of-fluid formulation for the study of coflowing fluids governed by the Hele-Shaw equations. Phys. Fluids 25(8), 082001. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4817374
  2. ANSYS Fluent User guide, ANSYS Inc. .
  3. Bogdevich, V. G., Evseev, A. R., Malyuga, A. G., & Migirenko, G. S., 1977. Gassaturation effect on near-wall turbulence characteristics. In 2nd Int. BHRA Fluid Drag Reduction Conf.;(United States) (No. CONF-7708129-).
  4. Brackbill, J.U., 1992. A continuum method for modeling surface tension. J. Comput. Phys. 100(2), 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(92)90240-Y
  5. Butterworth, J., Atlar, M., Shi, W., 2015. Experimental analysis of an air cavity concept applied on a ship hull to improve the hull resistance. Ocean Eng. 110, 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.022
  6. Deshpande, S.S., Anumolu, L., Trujillo, M.F., 2012. Evaluating the performance of the two-phase flow solver interFoam. Comput. Sci. Discov. 5(1), 014016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1749-4699/5/1/014016
  7. Duncan, J.H., 1983. The breaking and non-breaking wave resistance of a twodimensional hydrofoil. J. Fluid Mech. 126, 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112083000294
  8. Elbing, B.R., Winkel, E.S., Lay, K.A., Ceccio, S.L., Dowling, D.R., Perlin, M., 2008. Bubble-induced skin-friction drag reduction and the abrupt transition to air-layer drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 612, 201-236.
  9. Kumagai, I., N. Nakamura, Y. Murai, Y. Tasaka, Y. Takeda, and Y. Takahashi., 2010. A new power-saving device for air bubble generation: hydrofoil air pump for ship drag reduction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ship Drag Reduction SMOOTH-SHIPS.
  10. Kumagai, I., Murai, Y., Takahashi, Y., Sakamaki, H., Tsukahara, T., Ozaki, T., Tasaka, Y., Oishi, Y., April 2014. Experiments on bubble generation by a hydrofoil moving beneath the water surface for reducing ship drag. In: Li, Y., Zheng, Y. (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP, pp. 322-328. Vol. 1592, No. 1.
  11. Kumagai, I., Takahashi, Y., Murai, Y., 2015. Power-saving device for air bubble generation using a hydrofoil to reduce ship drag: theory, experiments, and application to ships. Ocean Eng. 95, 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.11.019
  12. Liu, J., Yap, Y.F., Nguyen, N.T., 2009. Behavior of microdroplets in diffuser/nozzle structures. Microfluid Nanofluidics 6(6), 835-846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-008-0358-5
  13. Liu, J., Yap, Y.F., Nguyen, N.T., 2011. Numerical study of the formation process of ferrofluid droplets. Phys. Fluids 23(7), 072008, 1994-present. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3614569
  14. Lyu X, Tang H, New T H, Hua H, Zhang J, Li H., 2015. Experimental Study on The Fluid Mechanics of Bubble Generation via A Hydrofoil. 2nd International Symposium on Frontiers in Applied Mechanics, Xi'an, China.
  15. Makiharju, S.A., Perlin, M., Ceccio, S.L., 2012. On the energy economics of air lubrication drag reduction. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 4(4), 412-422. https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0107
  16. McCORMICK, M.E., Bhattacharyya, R., 1973. Drag reduction of a submersible hull by electrolysis. Nav. Eng. J. 85(2), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1973.tb04788.x
  17. Menter, F.R., 1993. Zonal Two Equation K-turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows. AIAA paper, 2906.
  18. Menter, F.R., Kuntz, M., Langtry, R., 2003. Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. Turbul. Heat Mass Transf. 4(1).
  19. Molland, A.F., Turnock, S.R., Hudson, D.A., 2011. Components of Hull resistance. In: Ship Resistance and Propulsion: Practical Estimation of Propulsive Power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 12-68.
  20. Murai, Y., Fukuda, H., Oishi, Y., Kodama, Y., Yamamoto, F., 2007. Skin friction reduction by large air bubbles in a horizontal channel flow. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 33(2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.08.008
  21. Murai, Y., Kumagai, I., Tasaka, Y., Takeda, Y., Takahashi, Y., 2010. Hydrofoil type of bubble generator for marine drag redaction. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. Part B 76(no. 763), 483-485.
  22. Rusche, H., 2003. Computational Fluid Dynamics of Dispersed Two-phase Flows at High Phase Fractions (Doctoral Dissertation, Imperial College London. University of London.
  23. Scardovelli, R., Zaleski, S., 1999. Direct numerical simulation of free-surface and interfacial flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 567-603. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.31.1.567
  24. Sinha, T., Architechture, N., 2016. Various Methods Used to Minimise Resistance on Ship's Hull. Available from the Internet. www.marineinsight.com/navalarchitecture/vvarious-methods-used-to-minimise-resistance-on-ships-hull/.
  25. Takahashi, Y., 2012. WAIP: Winged Air Induction Pipe. http://www.randengineering.co.jp/e/report/WAIP%20120312%20Rev.4.pdf.
  26. Versteeg, H.K., Malalasekera, W., 2007. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method. Pearson Education, pp. P24-P25.

피인용 문헌

  1. Air retaining grids-a novel technology to maintain stable air layers under water for drag reduction vol.377, pp.2150, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0126
  2. Numerical investigation of frictional drag reduction with an air layer concept on the hull of a ship vol.32, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-019-0063-8
  3. Fluctuation in operational energy efficiency of ships and its implications for performance appraisal vol.13, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2021.04.004
  4. Quantifying the Durability of a Friction-Reducing Surface with Recoverable Superhydrophobicity vol.147, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001857
  5. Numerical investigations of micro bubble drag reduction effect for container ships vol.16, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40868-021-00104-9