Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning (농촌계획)

Korean Society of Rural Planning (한국농촌계획학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Recognition and Preference for Developing the Small Greenhouse of Urban agriculture in Korea

우리나라 도시농업환경에 적합한 소형온실 모델 개발을 위한 인식 및 선호도 분석

  • Kim, Hyung-Kweon (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Ryou, Young-Sun (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Young-Hwa (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Tae-Seok (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Oh, Sung-Sik (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Kang, Geum-Choon (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Moon, Jong-Pil (Protected Horticulture Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Won-Suk (Horticultural Research Div., Gyeonggi-Do Agricultural Research & Extension Services)
  • 김형권 (국립농업과학원 농업공학부) ;
  • 유영선 (국립농업과학원 농업공학부) ;
  • 김영화 (국립농업과학원 농업공학부) ;
  • 이태석 (국립농업과학원 농업공학부) ;
  • 오성식 (국립농업과학원 농업공학부) ;
  • 강금춘 (국립농업과학원 농업공학부) ;
  • 문종필 (국립원예특작과학원 시설원예연구소) ;
  • 이원석 (경기도농업기술원 원예연구과)
  • Received : 2018.06.11
  • Accepted : 2018.07.31
  • Published : 2018.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of our study was to provide a basic data for the development of a small greenhouse model suitable for urban farmers. The study analyzed installation inclination, positive and negative reasons for installation, location of installation, preferred crops in small greenhouses, plans for use of products, and expected effects by using small greenhouse. Positive opinion on small greenhouse installation was 80.4% of the survey respondents. The most positive reason for the installation of small greenhouses was fresh and safe food supply, and the negative reason was maintenance difficulties. The results obtained in our survey indicated that small greenhouses were more likely to be installed near the house, and urban farmers tended to grow organic leafy vegetables in soil. The expected benefits of small greenhouse operation were largely divided into 'benefit for the improvement of the quality of life' and 'benefit for economic profits', and expectation for the improvement of the quality of life was higher than economic benefit. As a result of the Likert 5-point scale analysis, 'benefit for the improvement of the quality of life' by using a small greenhouse was graded as high as 4.17~4.60. On the other hand, the 'benefit to economic profits' was rated as low as 3.51~4.14.

Keywords

References

  1. ACD, 2016, Catalogue, Available online:: http://www.acd-serres.fr/ (accessed on 18 July 2017).
  2. Chang, D.M., 2017, A Study on the Space Forming through Urban Agricultural Theory, Paradigm and Typology, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 18(2):501-513 (in Korean).
  3. Erik Bos, 2017, Urban greenhouses in The Netherlands to 'feed' the city and its citizens : Food growing in urban greenhouses researched from a social practice perspective, Wageningen University & Research.
  4. Garden&Greenhouse, 2015, How To Use a Small Greenhouse. Available online: http://www.gardenandgreenhouse.net/articles/may-2016/how-to-use-a-small-greenhouse/ (accessed on 13 July 2018).
  5. Gardenista, 2013, Urban Gardener: A Sliver of a Greenhouse for a Small Space. Available online: https://www.gardenista.com/posts/urban-gardener-a-sliver-of-a-greenhouse-for-a-small-space/ (accessed on 13 July 2018).
  6. Greenhouse emporium, 2018, Small Greenhouse Kits. Available online: https://www.greenhouseemporium.com/collections/smallgreenhouse-kits (accessed on 13 July 2018).
  7. Han, J.H., and D.M. Chang, 2014, A Study on the Sustainable Development Direction through Theory, Paradigm and Typology of Urban Agriculture, Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design, 15(6):33-46 (in Korean).
  8. Hwang, J.I., Y.J. Choi, B.G. Jang, and S.Y. Rhee, 2010, Segmentation and Characteristic Analysis of Urban Farmers Behavior, The Korean Journal of Community Living Science, 21(4):619-631 (in Korean).
  9. Kim, H.K., G.C. Kang, J.P. Moon, T.S. Lee, S.S. Oh, and W.S. Lee, 2017, A Basic Study for Development of small greenhouse, Proceedings of the Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control, 26(Supplement II):65 (in Korean).
  10. Kim, J.D, 2002, Globalization of Agriculture and the Movement of Alternative Agriculture, The Journal of Rural Society, 12(1):133-159 (in Korean).
  11. Kong, M.J., K.L. Park, J.K. Son, and J.H. Shin, 2012, Evaluation on Actual Condition and Image Analysis of Roof Garden in Seoul, Korea. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 15(5):69-83 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2012.15.5.069
  12. Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS), 2016, Urbanization rate, KOSIS, Daejeon, Korea (in Korean). Available online: http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_2KAA204&vw_cd=MT_RTITLE&list_id=ZTIT_B&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=A4 (accessed on 17 October 2017).
  13. Lee, D.G. and S.H. Cho, 2016, The Analysis on the Preference of Urban Agriculture Types in Accordance with Lifestyle, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 44(6):40-50 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.6.040
  14. Lee, W.S., S.Y. Lee, M.H. Seo, S.K. Kim and C.H. Jeon, 2012, Estimation of willingness to pay for horticultural facilities in urban underground and subway space: Focusing on the case of metro-farm facilities, Journal of Rural Development, 35(4):135-154 (in Korean).
  15. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), 2017, Act on development and support of urban agriculture, MAFRA, Sejong, Korea (in Korean).
  16. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), 2015, A Study on the Medium and Long-term Development of Urban Agriculture, MAFRA, Sejong, Korea (in Korean).
  17. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MIFAFF), 2012, A Study on Urban Agriculture Promotion and Multi-functionality, MIFAFF, Gwacheon, Korea (in Korean).
  18. Park, W.Z., B.H. Koo, M.O. Park, and H.J. Kwon, 2012, A Comparative Study on the Recognition of Urban Agriculture between Urban Farmers and Public Officials, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 40(4):90-103 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.4.090
  19. Rural Development Administration (RDA), 2014a, Energy saving technology for protected horticulture (Guide for agricultural techniques), RDA, Jeonju, Korea (in Korean).
  20. Rural Development Administration (RDA), 2014b, Protected horticulture (Guide for agricultural techniques), RDA, Jeonju, Korea (in Korean).
  21. Yu, B.G., 2000, A Study on the Development of Suburban Agriculture, The Journal of Rural Society, 10:37-70 (in Korean).