한국대기환경학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment)

  • 제34권4호
  • /
  • Pages.588-609
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1598-7132(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-5346(eISSN)
한국대기환경학회 (Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

미국의 초미세먼지 관리 제도 검토

Review of Particulate Matter Management in United States

  • Kim, Byeong-Uk (Georgia Environmental Protection Division) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Cheol (Air Resources Laboratory, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration) ;
  • Kim, Soontae (Department of Environmental & Safety Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 투고 : 2018.06.21
  • 심사 : 2018.08.21
  • 발행 : 2018.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The objective of this study is to provide information for improving the domestic particulate matter (PM) management. To achieve the study goal, we reviewed the past and current practice of PM management in the United States (US). Our review includes the assessment about the philosophical foundation and effectiveness of PM management, systematic program implementation to reach desirable PM conditions, and steady development of analytical tools including photochemical air quality models. We noticed that the current US PM management approach has improved annual $PM_{2.5}$ concentrations 22-48% in various parts of the US in the last 16 years. In addition, we analyzed strengths and difficulties in the past US PM management implementation. Based on the results of our analyses, we propose key elements to establish more effective domestic PM management in the future than now: steady investment in technological innovations and close-communications between local governments and the central government at various stages of PM management.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Air Pollution Training Institute (APTI) (2004) Preparation of Fine Particulate Emission Inventories. Research Triangle Park, NC.
  2. Appel, K.W., Napelenok, S.L., Foley, K.M., Pye, H.O., Hogrefe, C., Luecken, D.J., Bash, J.O., Roselle, S.J., Pleim, J.E., Foroutan, H. (2017) Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1, Geoscientific Model Development, 10(4), 1703-1732. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1703-2017
  3. Appel, K.W., Pouliot, G.A., Simon, H., Sarwar, G., Pye, H.O.T., Napelenok, S.L., Akhtar, F., Roselle, S.J. (2013) Evaluation of dust and trace metal estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0, Geoscientific Model Development, 6(4), 883-899. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013
  4. Byun, D., Schere, K.L. (2006) Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 59(2), 51-77. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2128636
  5. Chatani, S., Yamaji, K., Sakurai, T., Itahashi, S., Shimadera, H., Kitayama, K., Hayami, H. (2018) Overview of Model Inter-Comparison in Japan's Study for Reference Air Quality Modeling (J-STREAM), Atmosphere, 9(1), 19. doi:10.3390/atmos9010019
  6. Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Chen, L.-W.A., Arnott, W.P., Moosmuller, H., Fung, K. (2004) Equivalence of elemental carbon by thermal/optical reflectance and transmittance with different temperature protocols. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(16), 4414-4422. https://doi.org/10.1021/es034936u
  7. Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Chen, L.-W.A., Rice, J., Frank, N.H. (2010) Quantification of $PM_{2.5}$ organic carbon sampling artifacts in US networks, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(12), 5223-5239. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5223-2010
  8. Clappier, A., Belis, C.A., Pernigotti, D., Thunis, P. (2017) Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis: two methodologies with two different purposes, Geoscientific Model Development, 10(11), 4245-4256. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4245-2017
  9. Cohan, D.S., Boylan, J.W., Marmur, A., Khan, M.N. (2007) An Integrated Framework for Multipollutant Air Quality Management and Its Application in Georgia, Environmental Management, 40(4), 545-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0228-4
  10. Dillner, A. (2016) Recent Changes to the IMPROVE and CSN Organic Carbon Artifact Adjustment Method. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-10/documents/recent_changes_to_the_improve.pdf (accessed 2018)
  11. Environmental Council of the States (ECOS) (2016) State Delegation of Environmental Acts. https://www.ecos.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/February-2016-Green-Report.doc (accessed 2018).
  12. Galvis, B., Bergin, Michael, Boylan, J., Huang, Y., Bergin, Michelle, Russell, A.G. (2015) Air quality impacts and health-benefit valuation of a low-emission technology for rail yard locomotives in Atlanta Georgia, Science of The Total Environment, 533(15), 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.064
  13. Gao, M., Han, Z., Liu, Z., Li, M., Xin, J., Tao, Z., Li, J., Kang, J.-E., Huang, K., Dong, X., Zhuang, B., Li, S., Ge, B., Wu, Q., Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., Lee, H.-J., Kim, C.-H., Fu, J.S., Wang, T., Chin, M., Woo, J.-H., Zhang, Q., Wang, Z., Carmichael, G.R. (2018) Air quality and climate change, Topic 3 of the Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia Phase III (MICS-Asia III) - Part 1: Overview and model evaluation, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(7), 4859-4884. doi:10.5194/acp-18-4859-2018
  14. Gong, B., Kim, J., Kim, H., Lee, S., Kim, H., Jo, J., Kim, J., Gang, D., Park, J.M., Hong, J. (2016) A Study on the Characteristics of Condensable Fine Particles in Flue Gas. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 32(5), 501-512. doi:10.5572/kosae.2016.32.5.501. (in Korean with English abstract)
  15. Hall, E.S., Kaushik, S.M., Vanderpool, R.W., Duvall, R.M., Beaver, M.R., Long, R.W., Solomon, P.A. (2014) Integrating sensor monitoring technology into the current air pollution regulatory support paradigm: Practical considerations, American Journal of Environmental Engineering, 4(6), 147-154.
  16. Itahashi, S., Yamaji, K., Chatani, S., Hayami, H. (2018) Refinement of Modeled Aqueous-Phase Sulfate Production via the Fe- and Mn-Catalyzed Oxidation Pathway, Atmosphere, 9(4), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9040132
  17. Jeffries, H. (2003) How Well Do Quality Models Simulate Air Pollution Emissions & Corresponding Reductions Needed to Protect Health and the Environment?, Air Quality in Houston, Fall 2003 Seminar Series, Shell Center for Sustainability, Rice University, November 4, 2003
  18. Jiang, B., Xia, D. (2017) Role identification of $NH_3$ in atmospheric secondary new particle formation in haze occurrence of China. Atmospheric Environment, 163, 107-117. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.035
  19. Karmel, P.E., FitzGibbon, T.N. (2002) $PM_{2.5}$: Federal and California Regulation of Fine Particulate Air Pollution, California Environmental Law Reporter 18.
  20. Khan, B., Hays, M.D., Geron, C., Jetter, J. (2012) Differences in the OC/EC Ratios that Characterize Ambient and Source Aerosols due to Thermal-Optical Analysis, Aerosol Science and Technology, 46(2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.609194
  21. Kim, S., Bae, C., Kim, B.U., Kim, H.C. (2017a) $PM_{2.5}$ Simulations for the Seoul Metropolitan Area: ( I ) Contributions of Precursor Emissions in the 2013 CAPSS Emissions Inventory, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 33(2), 139-158. doi:10.5572/kosae.2017.33.2.139. (in Korean with English abstract)
  22. Kim, S., Bae, C., Yoo, C., Kim, B.U., Kim, H.C., Moon, N. (2017b) $PM_{2.5}$ Simulations for the Seoul Metropolitan Area: (II) Estimation of Self-Contributions and Emissionto-$PM_{2.5}$ Conversion Rates for Each Source Category, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 33(4), 377-392. doi:10.5572/kosae.2017.33.4.377. (in Korean with English abstract)
  23. Koo, B., Knipping, E., Yarwood, G. (2014) 1.5-Dimensional volatility basis set approach for modeling organic aerosol in CAMx and CMAQ. Atmospheric Environment 95, 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.031
  24. Lee, I.H., Choi, D.S., Ko, M.J., Park, Y.-K. (2017) PM Management Methods Considering Condensable PM Emissions from Stationary Sources in Seoul and Incheon. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 33(4), 319-325. doi:10.5572/kosae.2017.33.4.319. (in Korean with English abstract)
  25. Lilley, K.A., Day, A. (2007) New Source Review Rulemakings & Court Decisions. http://www.lawseminars.com/materials/07AIRWA/Lilley%2009-26-07.pdf (accessed 2018).
  26. Link, M.F., Kim, J., Park, G., Lee, T., Park, T., Babar, Z.B., Sung, K., Kim, P., Kang, S., Kim, J.S., Choi, Y., Son, J., Lim, H.-J., Farmer, D.K. (2017) Elevated production of $NH_4$ $NO_3$ from the photochemical processing of vehicle exhaust: Implications for air quality in the Seoul Metropolitan Region. Atmospheric Environment, 156, 95-101. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.031
  27. Long, C.M., Nascarella, M.A., Valberg, P.A. (2013) Carbon black vs. black carbon and other airborne materials containing elemental carbon: Physical and chemical distinctions, Environmental Pollution, 181, 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.009
  28. Meng, Z., Lin, W., Zhang, R., Han, Z., Jia, X. (2017) Summertime ambient ammonia and its effects on ammonium aerosol in urban Beijing, China. Science of The Total Environment, 579, 1521-1530. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.159
  29. Mills, A.D., Wiser, R.H., Seel, J. (2017) Power Plant Retirements: Trends and Possible Drivers. https://doi.org/10.2172/1411667 (accessed 2018).
  30. Nolte, C.G., Appel, K.W., Kelly, J.T., Bhave, P.V., Fahey, K.M., Collett Jr, J.L., Zhang, L., Young, J.O. (2015) Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v5. 0 against size-resolved measurements of inorganic particle composition across sites in North America, Geoscientific Model Development, 8(9), 2877-2892. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2877-2015
  31. Nopmongcol, U., Koo, B., Tai, E., Jung, J., Piyachaturawat, P., Emery, C., Yarwood, G., Pirovano, G., Mitsakou, C., Kallos, G. (2012) Modeling Europe with CAMx for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII). Atmospheric Environment, 53, 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.023
  32. North American Research Strategy for Tropospheric Ozone (NARSTO) (2004) Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers: A NARSTO Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
  33. Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., Belitz, K. (1994) Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences, Science, 263(5147), 641-646. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5147.641
  34. Ramboll-Environ (2016) Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions. http://www.camx.com/ (accessed 2016).
  35. Rao, S.T., Galmarini, S., Puckett, K. (2011) Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII): Advancing the State of the Science in Regional Photochemical Modeling and Its Applications, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 92, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3069.1
  36. Russell, A., Dennis, R. (2000) NARSTO critical review of photochemical models and modeling. Atmospheric Environment, 34(12-14), 2283-2324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00468-9
  37. Stensvaag, J.M. (2006) Preventing Significant Deterioration Under the Clean Air Act: Baselines, Increments, and Ceilings-Part II, Environmental Law Reporter, 36, 10017-10046.
  38. U.S. Energy Information Administration (US EIA) (2014) Almost all power plants that retired in the past decade were powered by fossil fuels. Today in Energy. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=34452 (accessed 2018).
  39. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2004) Map of Nonattainment Areas Fine Particle ($PM_{2.5}$) Designations. https://www3.epa.gov/pmdesignations/1997standards/documents/final/nonattaingreen.htm (accessed 2017).
  40. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2007a) Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, $PM_{2.5}$, and Regional Haze (No. EPA-454/B-07-002). https://www3.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/guide/final-03-pm-rh-guidance.pdf (accessed 2018).
  41. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2007b) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Removal of Vacated Elements, 72 FR 32526. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2007/06/13/E7-11289/prevention-of-significant-deterioration-psd-andnonattainment-new-source-review-nsr-removal-of (accessed 2018).
  42. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2008a) Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy for State, Local, and Tribal Air Agencies. Research Triangle Park, NC. https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/monitorstrat/AAMS%20for%20SLTs%20%20-%20FINAL%20Dec%202008.pdf (accessed 2018).
  43. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2008b) Air Emissions Reporting Requirements, 80 FR 8787. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-02-19/pdf/2015-03470.pdf (accessed 2018).
  44. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2010) Field Evaluation of an Improved Method for Sampling and Analysis of Filterable and Condensable Particulate Matter, EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0348. https://www3.epa.gov/ttnemc01/methods/preamble201a202.pdf (accessed 2018).
  45. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2012) Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Proposed Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter (No. EPA-452/R-12-003). https://www3.epa.gov/ttnecas1/regdata/RIAs/finalria.pdf (accessed 2018).
  46. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2013) U.S.-Mexico Border 2020 Program. https://www.epa.gov/border2020 (accessed 2017).
  47. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2014a) Process of Reviewing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/process-reviewing-national-ambient-air-quality-standards (accessed 2017).
  48. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2014b) NAAQS Implementation Process. https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-implementationprocess (accessed 2017).
  49. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2014c) Collaboration with Mexico to Reduce Emissions from Ships. https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/collaboration-mexico-reduce-emissions-ships (accessed 2017).
  50. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2015a) Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act 1990-2020, the Second Prospective Study. https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/benefits-and-costs-cleanair-act-1990-2020-second-prospective-study (accessed 2018).
  51. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2015b) SPECIATE Version 4.5 through 4.0. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-modeling/speciate-version-45-through-40 (accessed 2017).
  52. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2015c) Prevention of Significant Deterioration Basic Information. https://www.epa.gov/nsr/prevention-significant-deterioration-basic-information (accessed 2018).
  53. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2015d) Nonattainment NSR Basic Information https://www.epa.gov/nsr/nonattainment-nsr-basic-information (accessed 2018).
  54. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2015e) Operating Permits Issued under Title V of the Clean Air Act https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits (accessed 2017).
  55. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2015f ) U.S.-Canada Air Quality Agreement https://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/us-canada-air-quality-agreement (accessed 2017).
  56. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2015g) NSR Regulatory Actions https://www.epa.gov/nsr/nsrregulatory-actions (accessed 2017).
  57. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016a) Particulate Matter ($PM_{2.5}$) Trends. https://www.epa.gov/air-trends/particulate-matter-pm25-trends (accessed 2017).
  58. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016b) Table of Historical Particulate Matter (PM) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/table-historical-particulatematter-pm-national-ambient-air-quality-standardsnaaqs (accessed 2017).
  59. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016c) Draft $PM_{2.5}$ Precursor Demonstration Guidance. https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/draft-pm25-precursordemonstration-guidance (accessed 2017).
  60. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016d) Particle Pollution Designations Guidance and Data. https://www.epa.gov/particle-pollution-designations/particle-pollution-designations-guidanceand-data (accessed 2017).
  61. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016e) $PM_{2.5}$ NAAQS Final SIP Requirements Rule. https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/pm25-naaqs-final-siprequirements-rule-july-2016 (accessed 2017).
  62. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016f) NCore Multipollutant Monitoring Network. https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/ncore.html (accessed 2017).
  63. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016g) Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI). https://www.epa.gov/electronic-reportingair-emissions/compliance-and-emissions-datareporting-interface-cedri (accessed 2017).
  64. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016h) E-Enterprise Combined Air Emissions Reporting (CAER). https://www.epa.gov/e-enterprise/e-enterprise-combined-air-emissions-reporting-caer (accessed 2017).
  65. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016i) Guidance on the Development of Modeled Emission Rates for Precursors (MERPs) as a Tier 1 Demonstration Tool for Ozone and $PM_{2.5}$ under the PSD Permitting Program. https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA454_R_16_006.pdf
  66. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016j) RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse (RBLC) Basic Information. https://www.epa.gov/catc/ractbactlaer-clearing house-rblc-basic-information (accessed 2017).
  67. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016k) Cost Reports and Guidance for Air Pollution Regulations. https://www.epa.gov/economic-and-cost-analysisair-pollution-regulations/cost-reports-and-guidance-air-pollution (accessed 2018).
  68. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016l) Clean Air Act Stationary Source Compliance Monitoring Strategy. https://www.epa.gov/compliance/cleanair-act-stationary-source-compliance-monitoringstrategy (accessed 2018).
  69. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2017a) Green Book, https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/mappm25_2012.html (accessed 2017).
  70. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2017b) Air Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implementation of Ozone and Particulate Matter NAAQS and Regional Haze Regulations. Research Triangle Park, NC.
  71. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2017c) Factors Information REtrieval System (FIRE). https://cfpub.epa.gov/webfire/ (accessed 2017).
  72. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2017d) Streamlining Permitting and Reducing Regulatory Burdens for Domestic Manufacturing, 82 FR 8667, https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-01-30/pdf/2017-02044.pdf (accessed 2018).
  73. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2017e) The Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII). https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?dirEntryId=335518 (accessed 2017).
  74. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2017f ) Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models: Enhancements to the AERMOD Dispersion Modeling System and Incorporation of Approaches To Address Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter, 82 FR 5182, https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-01-17/pdf/2016-31747.pdf (accessed 2018).
  75. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2017g) Use of Photochemical Grid Models for Single-Source Ozone and secondary $PM_{2.5}$ impacts for Permit Program Related Assessments and for NAAQS Attainment Demonstrations for Ozone, $PM_{2.5}$ and Regional Haze. Research Triangle Park, NC.
  76. Vautard, R., Moran, M.D., Solazzo, E., Gilliam, R.C., Matthias, V., Bianconi, R., Chemel, C., Ferreira, J., Geyer, B., Hansen, A.B., Jericevic, A., Prank, M., Segers, A., Silver, J.D., Werhahn, J., Wolke, R., Rao, S.T., Galmarini, S. (2012) Evaluation of the meteorological forcing used for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) air quality simulations. Atmospheric Environment, 53, 15-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.065
  77. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc. (2001) 531 U.S. 457,121 S. Ct. 903, 149 L. Ed. 2d 1