한국콘텐츠학회논문지 (The Journal of the Korea Contents Association)

  • 제18권8호
  • /
  • Pages.415-433
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1598-4877(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-6723(eISSN)
한국콘텐츠학회 (The Korea Contents Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

집합적 리더십이 구성원의 직무열의에 미치는 영향 : 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개효과와 자기효능감의 조절효과를 중심으로

Effects of Collective Leadership on Follower's Work Engagement: Examining the role of Psychological Empowerment and Self-efficacy

  • 투고 : 2018.06.15
  • 심사 : 2018.07.20
  • 발행 : 2018.08.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국내 기업의 근무자를 대상으로 집합적 리더십의 효과성을 연구하는데 있어 심리적 임파워먼트와 직무열의의 관계를 규명하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 집합적 리더십이 직무열의에 미치는 영향, 집합적 리더십과 직무열의간의 관계에서 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개효과 그리고 심리적 임파워먼트와 직무열의간의 관계에서 자기효능감의 조절효과를 검증하였다. 국내 7개 기업 237명을 대상으로 연구를 실시하였고, 수집된 자료의 분석과 통계처리를 위하여 SPSS21.0과 M-Plus6을 사용하였다. 연구 결과, 집합적 리더십은 종업원의 직무열의에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 밝혀졌고 이 과정에서 종업원의 심리적 임파워먼트는 매개 역할을 하는 것으로 검증되었다. 이러한 결과는 집합적 리더십이 종업원의 심리적 임파워먼트를 촉진하고 직무열의에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 주요 변인임을 입증하는 것이다. 종업원의 심리적 임파워먼트와 직무열의의 관계에서 종업원의 자기효능감은 조절효과를 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로, 본 연구 결과가 주는 이론적 및 실무적 함의를 논하였으며, 마지막으로 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구방향을 제시하였다.

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between collective leadership and employee's work engagement and psychological empowerment. This study tested the impact of collective leadership on employee's work engagement and the mediating role of psychological empowerment between the two variables. And also, this study tested moderating role of self-efficacy between psychological empowerment and work engagement. A total of 237 employees in 7 companies in South Korea participated in this study. The SPSS 21.0 and M-Plus6 statistical programs were used in this study to analyze and statistically process the collected survey data. The result showed that collective leadership positively influence employee's work engagement and psychological empowerment works as mediator in the relationship between collective leadership and employee's work engagement. This results means that collective leadership is a crucial factor to facilitate employee's psychological empowerment toward employee's work engagement. Self-efficacy had moderating effect between psychological empowerment and work engagement. Finally, theoretical and practical implications of the study results have been discussed along with limitations and future direction of the study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. N. S. Contractor, L. A. DeChurch, J. Carson, D. R. Carter, and B Keegan, "The topology of collective leadership," The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.23, pp.994-1011, 2002.
  2. S. J. Zaccaro, A. L. Rittman, and M. A. Marks, "Team leadership," The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.12, pp.451-483, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00093-5
  3. T. L. Friedrich, M. D. Mumford, B. Vessey, C. Beeler, and D. Eubank, "Leading for innovation: Re-evaluating leader influences with regard to innovation type and complexity," International Studies of Organization and Management, Vol.40, pp.6-29, 2010.
  4. K. Cullen and F. J. Yammarino, "Special issue on collective and network approaches to leadership," The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.25, pp.180-181, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.12.005
  5. J. K. Harter, F. L. Schmidt, and T. L. Hayes, "Business unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement and business outcomes: A meta-analysis," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.87, pp.268-279, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
  6. M. S. Kim, Antecedents and consequences of job engagement, Doctoral Dissertation, Soongsil Universit, 2014.
  7. Burns, Bernard, "Complexity theories and organizational change," International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol.7, No.2, pp.73-90, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x
  8. C. L. Pearce, "The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work," Academy of Management Executive, Vol.18, pp.47-55, 2004.
  9. C. L. Pearce and J. A. Conger, Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2003.
  10. T. L. Friedrich, W. B. Vessy, M. J. Schuelke, G. A. Ruark, and M. D. Mumford, "A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks," The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.20, pp.933-958, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.008
  11. P. Gronn, "Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis," The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.13, pp.423-451, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
  12. C. L. Pearce and J. A. Conger, Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2003.
  13. N. J. Hiller, D. V. Day, and R. J. Vance, "Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: A field study," The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.17, pp.387-397, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.004
  14. M. C. Mayo, J. R. Meindl, and J. C. Pastor, "Shared leadership in work team: A social network approach," In C. Perce, & J. Conger(Eds.). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.193-214, 2003.
  15. E. P. Hollander, Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp.485-538), (3rd ed.), New York: Random House, 1985.
  16. K. L. Cullen-Lester and F. J. Yammarino, "Collective and network approaches to leadership: Special issue introduction," The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.27, pp.173-180, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.001
  17. T. L. Friedirch, W. B. Vessey, M. J. Schuelke, M. D. Mumford, F. J. Yammarino, and G. A. Ruark, "Collectivistic leadership and George C. Marshall: A historiometric analysis of career events," The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.25, pp.449-467, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.012
  18. W. B. Schaufeli, M. Salanova, U. Gonzalez-Roma, and A. B. Bakker, "The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol.3, pp.71-92, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  19. W. A. Kahn, "Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.33, pp.692-724, 1990.
  20. W. B. Schaufeli and A. B. Bakker, "Job demand, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study," Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.25, pp.293-315, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
  21. A. B. Bakker and E. Demerouti, "The job demands-resources model: State of art," Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.22, pp.309-328, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
  22. B. L. Rich, J. A. LePine, and E. R. Crawford, "Job engagement: Antecedents and effect on job performance," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.53, pp.617-635, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
  23. M. S. Christian, A. S. Garza, and J. E. Slaughter, "Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance," Personnel Psychology, Vol.64, pp.89-136, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
  24. W. H Macey and B. Schneider, "The meaning of employee engagement," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol.1, pp.3-30, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
  25. J. A. Conger and R. N. Kanungo, "The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice," Academy of Management Review, Vol.13, pp.471-482, 1988. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306983
  26. K. Thomas and B. Velthouse, "Cognitive elements of empowerment: An integrative model of intrinsic task motivation," Academy of Management Review, Vol.15, pp.666-681, 1990.
  27. G. M. Spreitzer, "Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.38, pp.1442-1465, 1995.
  28. S. E. Seibert, G. Wang, and S. H. Courtright, "Antecedents and consequences psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analysis review," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.96, pp.981-1003, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022676
  29. S. E. Humphrey, J. D. Nahrgang, and F. P. Morgeson, "Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.92, pp.1332-1356, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332
  30. G. M. Spreitzer, "Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper(Eds.)," Handbook of organizational behavior, Thousnad Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.
  31. R. Kark, B. Shamir, and G. Chen, "The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.88, pp.246-255, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.246
  32. C. S. Koberg, R. W. Boss, J. C. Senjem, and E. A. Goodman, "Antecedents and outcomes of empowerment: Empirical evidence from the health care industry," Group and Organization Management, Vol.24, pp.71-91, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601199241005
  33. R. C. Liden, R. T. Sparrowe, and S. J. Wayne, "Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future," Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol.15, pp.47-119, 1997.
  34. R. C. Liden, S. J. Wayne, and R. T. Sparrowe, "An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relationship between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.85, pp.407-416, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.407
  35. S. L. Meyerson and T. J. Kline, "Psychological and environmental empowerment: Antecedents and consequences," Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol.29, pp.444-460, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810887049
  36. J. Bhatnagar, "Management of innovation: role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context," The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.23, pp.928-951, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.651313
  37. T. M. Sun, Structural relationship between mid-level administrators' authentic leadership, level of learning organization, self-efficacy of staff, and organizational effectiveness in Korean national universities, Doctorial Dissertation, Soongsil University, 2015.
  38. A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change," Psychological Review, Vol.84, pp.191-215, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  39. A. R. Elangovan and J. L. Xie, "Effects of perceived power of supervisor on subordinate stress and motivation: The moderating role of subordinate characteristics," Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.20, pp.359-373, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199905)20:3<359::AID-JOB902>3.0.CO;2-Z
  40. T. A. Judge, C. L. Jackson, J. C. Shaw, B. A. Scott, and B. L. Rich, "Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual difference," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.92, pp.107-127, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107
  41. S. M. Elias, C. E. Barney, and J. W. Bishop, "The treatment of self-efficacy among psychology and management scholars," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.43, pp.811-822, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12007
  42. T. Chen, F. Li, and K. Leung, "When does supervisor support encourage innovative behavior? Opposite moderating effects of general self-efficacy and internal locus of control," Personnel Psychology, Vol.69, pp.123-158, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12104
  43. T. L. Friedrich, J. A. Griffith, and M. D. Mumford, "Collective leadership behaviors: Evaluating the leader, team network, and problem situation characteristics that influence their use," The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.27, pp.312-333, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.004
  44. G. R. Vogelgesang, H. Leroy, and B. J. Avolio, "The mediating effects of leader integrity with transparency in communication and work engagement/performance," The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.24, pp.405-413, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.01.004
  45. F. J. Yammarino, M. D. Mumford, W. B. Vessey, T. L. Friedrich, G. A. Ruark, and J. M. Brunner, "Collective leadership measurement for the U.S. Army," Study report 2014-01, contract No.91WAW-09-C-0090. Fort Belvoir, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2014.
  46. G. Graen and T. Scandura, "Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In Staw B, Cummings LL(Eds.)," Research in organizational behavior, Vol.9, pp.175-208, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987.
  47. T. S. Yoo and S. J. Oh, "Impact of Shared Leadership on Team Work Engagement-Focusing on the Mediating Role of Team Positive Psychological Capital and the Moderating Role of Task Characteristics," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, Vol.16, No.9, pp.308-328, 2016 https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.09.308
  48. M. T. Maynard, L. L. Gilson, and J. E. Mathieu, "Empowerment_Fad or Fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research," Journal of Management, Vol.38, pp.1231-1281, 2012.
  49. 황종문, 김성종, "상사신뢰가 조직효과성에 미치는 영향 연구-심리적 임파워먼트의 매개효과를 중심으로," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, Vol.16, No.3, pp.617-629, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.03.617
  50. J. W. Kim, "The Impact of shared leadership on employees' job attitude," Doctoral Dissertation, Kyung Hee University, 2013.
  51. J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
  52. J. C Anderson and D. W. Gerbing, "Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach," Psychological Bulletin, Vol.103, pp.411-423, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  53. D. A. Kenny, D. Kashy, and N. Bolger, "Data analysis in social psychology" In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G Lindzey(Eds.), Handbook of socila psychology(4th ed. pp.233-265), New York: McGraw-Hill.