DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of the amount of tooth surface preparation on the shear bond strength of zirconia cantilever single-retainer resin-bonded fixed partial denture

  • Sillam, Charles-Ellie (Department of Stomatology and Dentistry, Erasmus Hospital, Universite Libre de Bruxelles) ;
  • Cetik, Sibel (Department of Stomatology and Dentistry, Erasmus Hospital, Universite Libre de Bruxelles) ;
  • Ha, Thai Hoang (Department of Stomatology and Dentistry, Erasmus Hospital, Universite Libre de Bruxelles) ;
  • Atash, Ramin (Department of Stomatology and Dentistry, Erasmus Hospital, Universite Libre de Bruxelles)
  • 투고 : 2017.12.01
  • 심사 : 2018.05.31
  • 발행 : 2018.08.31

초록

PURPOSE. Conventional resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) are usually made with a two-retainer design. Unlike conventional RBFPDs, cantilever resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (Cantilever RBFPDs) are, for their part, made with a single-retainer design. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of tooth surface preparation on the bond strength of zirconia cantilever single-retainer RBFPDs. The objective is to evaluate the shear bond strength of these single-retainer RBFPDs bonded on 3 different amount of tooth surface preparation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty extracted bovine incisors were categorized to 3 groups (n=10), with different amounts of tooth surface preparations. Teeth were restored with single-retainer RBFPDs with different retainer surfaces: large retainer of $32mm^2$; medium retainer of $22mm^2$; no retainer and only a proximal connecting box of $12mm^2$. All RBFPDs were made of zirconia and were bonded using an adhesive system without adhesive capacity. Shear forces were applied to these restorations until debonding. RESULTS. Mean shear bond strength values for the groups I, II, and II were $2.39{\pm}0.53MPa$, $3.13{\pm}0.69MPa$, and $5.40{\pm}0.96MPa$, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni post-hoc test, at a significance level of 0.001. Failure modes were observed and showed a 100% adhesive fracture. CONCLUSION. It can be concluded that the preparation of large tooth surface preparation might be irrelevant. For zirconia single-retainer RBFPD, only the preparation of a proximal connecting box seems to be a reliable and minimally invasive approach. The differences are statistically significant.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kern M. Clinical long-term survival of two-retainer and single-retainer all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2005;36:141-7.
  2. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Tan K, Bragger U, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded bridges after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:131-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01527.x
  3. Hussey DL, Pagni C, Linden GJ. erformance of 400 adhesive bridges fitted in a restorative dentistry department. J Dent 1991;19:221-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(91)90122-F
  4. Durey KA, Nixon PJ, Robinson S, Chan MF. esin bonded bridges: techniques for success. Br Dent J 2011;211:113-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.619
  5. Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B. urface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 2009;88:817-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509340881
  6. Botelho M. esign principles for cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2000;31:613-9.
  7. Djemal S, Setchell D, King P, Wickens J. ong-term survival characteristics of 832 resin-retained bridges and splints provided in a post-graduate teaching hospital between 1978 and 1993. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:302-20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00374.x
  8. Chan AW, Barnes IE. A prospective study of cantilever resinbonded bridges: an initial report. Aust Dent J 2000;45:31-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00239.x
  9. Olin PS, Hill EM, Donahue JL. Clinical evaluation of resinbonded bridges: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int 1991;22:873-7.
  10. Bassi GS, Youngson CC. An in vitro study of dentin exposure during resin-bonded fixed partial denture preparation. Quintessence Int 2004;35:541-8.
  11. Kern M, Sasse M. Ten-year survival of anterior all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:407-10.
  12. van Dalen A, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. A literature review of two-unit cantilevered FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:281-4.
  13. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater 2011;27:71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.022

피인용 문헌

  1. Patient with Poor Esthetic Anterior Tooth Position Treated with Lithium Disilicate Mesial Cantilever Single-retainer Fixed Partial Denture: A Case Report vol.62, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2020-0038