References
- Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. Elsevier Health Sciences; MO, USA, 2014.
- Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35:207-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.02.004
- Ganz SD. Three-dimensional imaging and guided surgery for dental implants. Dent Clin North Am 2015;59:265-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2014.11.001
- Shim JS, Kim NH, Kim JE. A procedure for the computerguided implant planning: A narrative review. J Korean Dent Assoc 2016;54:108-22.
- Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:112-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x
- Sicilia A, Botticelli D; Working Group 3. Computer-guided implant therapy and soft- and hard-tissue aspects. The third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:157-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02553.x
- Martorelli M. A new approach in CT artifact removal: three cases study in maxillofacial surgery. Int J Interact Des Manuf 2013;7:115-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-012-0171-y
- Komiyama A, Pettersson A, Hultin M, Nasstrom K, Klinge B. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:308-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02001.x
- Yoon JH. The accuracy estimate of surgical stents fabricated by digital methods in installing implants on dental models. Chonnam National University. Master Degree Thesis. 2017.
- Choi B, Jeong S. Digital flapless implantology. Seoul; Ji-Sung Publishing Co.; 2015. p. 32-51.
- Al Quran FA, Rashdan BA, Zomar AA, Weiner S. Passive fit and accuracy of three dental implant impression techniques. Quintessence Int 2012;43:119-25.
- Binon PP. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:149-60.
- Pozzi A, Polizzi G, Moy PK. Guided surgery with tooth-supported templates for single missing teeth: A critical review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2016;9:S135-53.
- Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Berge SJ, Maal TJ. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computerplanned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:343-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12112
- Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol 2008;79:1339-45. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080059
- Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:416-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02337.x
- Kang BG, Kim HJ, Chung CH. Accuracy of the CT guided implant template by using an intraoral scanner according to the edentulous distance. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2017;55:1-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2017.55.1.1
- Pettersson A, Kero T, Gillot L, Cannas B, Faldt J, Soderberg R, Nasstrom K. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:334-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60072-8
- Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Stefanelli LV, Cavallini C. The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:264-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.010
- Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:394-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.09.033
- Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:234-42.
- Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Strbac G, Schemper M, Zechner W. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1157-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02070.x
- Park C, Raigrodski AJ, Rosen J, Spiekerman C, London RM. Accuracy of implant placement using precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:372-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60080-9
Cited by
- Patient Eligibility for Standardized Treatment of the Edentulous Mandible: A Retrospective CBCT-Based Assessment of Mandibular Morphology vol.8, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050616
- Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review vol.7, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7020052
- Digital Evaluation of the Accuracy of Computer-Guided Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study vol.9, pp.16, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163373
- Clinical and tomographic comparison of dental implants placed by guided virtual surgery versus conventional technique: A split‐mouth randomized clinical trial vol.47, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13211
- Validation of the Accuracy of Postoperative Analysis Methods for Locating the Actual Position of Implants: An In Vitro Study vol.10, pp.20, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207266
- The Modern and Digital Transformation of Oral Health Care: A Mini Review vol.9, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020118
- Effects of Groove Sealing of the Posterior Occlusal Surface and Offset of the Internal Surface on the Internal Fit and Accuracy of Implant Placements Using 3D-Printed Surgical Guides: An In Vitro Stud vol.13, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081236
- Correlation of Panoramic Radiography, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, and Three-Dimensional Printing in the Assessment of the Spatial Location of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars vol.10, pp.18, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184189