Radiation Oncology Journal

  • 제36권1호
  • /
  • Pages.11-16
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2234-1900(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-3156(eISSN)
대한방사선종양학회 (The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11)

  • Lee, Eonju (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Won (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Sung Hwan (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Jae Ho (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jin Hee (Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Kwan Ho (Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Choi, Young Min (Department of Radiation Oncology, Dong-A University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Sung (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jin Ho (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jang, Hong-Seok (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Young-Seok (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Nam, Taek-Keun (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School)
  • 투고 : 2017.02.13
  • 심사 : 2017.06.26
  • 발행 : 2018.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: To investigate interobserver variation in target volume delineations for prostate cancer salvage radiotherapy using planning computed tomography (CT) versus combined planning CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: Ten radiation oncologists independently delineated a target volume on the planning CT scans of five cases with different pathological status after radical prostatectomy. Two weeks later, this was repeated with the addition of planning MRI. The volumes obtained with CT only and combined CT and MRI were compared, and the effect of the addition of planning MRI on interobserver variability was assessed. Results: There were large differences in clinical target volume (CTV) delineated by each observer, regardless of the addition of planning MRI ($9.44-139.27cm^3$ in CT only and $7.77-122.83cm^3$ in CT plus MRI) and no significant differences in the mean and standard deviation of CTV. However, there were decreases in mean volume and standard deviation as a result of using the planning MRI. Conclusion: This study showed substantial interobserver variation in target volume delineation for salvage radiotherapy. The combination of planning MRI with CT tended to decrease the target volume and the variation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Valicenti RK, Thompson I Jr, Albertsen P, et al. Adjuvant and salvage radiation therapy after prostatectomy: American Society for Radiation Oncology/American Urological Association guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013;86:822-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.029
  2. Swanson GP, Hussey MA, Tangen CM, et al. Predominant treatment failure in postprostatectomy patients is local: analysis of patterns of treatment failure in SWOG 8794. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2225-9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6495
  3. Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 2009;181:956-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.032
  4. Bolla M, van Poppel H, Collette L, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet 2005;366:572-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67101-2
  5. Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Crispen PL, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML. Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: impact on metastasis and survival. J Urol 2009;182:2708-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.027
  6. Trock BJ, Han M, Freedland SJ, et al. Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2008;299:2760-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.23.2760
  7. Poortmans P, Bossi A, Vandeputte K, et al. Guidelines for target volume definition in post-operative radiotherapy for prostate cancer, on behalf of the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group. Radiother Oncol 2007;84:121-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.07.017
  8. Sidhom MA, Kneebone AB, Lehman M, et al. Post-prostatectomy radiation therapy: consensus guidelines of the Australian and New Zealand Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary Group. Radiother Oncol 2008;88:10-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.05.006
  9. Wiltshire KL, Brock KK, Haider MA, et al. Anatomic boundaries of the clinical target volume (prostate bed) after radical prostatectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:1090-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.068
  10. Michalski JM, Lawton C, El Naqa I, et al. Development of RTOG consensus guidelines for the definition of the clinical target volume for postoperative conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:361-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.006
  11. Roach M 3rd, Faillace-Akazawa P, Malfatti C, Holland J, Hricak H. Prostate volumes defined by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomographic scans for threedimensional conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996;35:1011-8.
  12. Villeirs GM, L Verstraete K, De Neve WJ, De Meerleer GO. Magnetic resonance imaging anatomy of the prostate and periprostatic area: a guide for radiotherapists. Radiother Oncol 2005;76:99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.015
  13. Villeirs GM, Van Vaerenbergh K, Vakaet L, et al. Interobserver delineation variation using CT versus combined CT + MRI in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2005;181:424-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-005-1383-x
  14. Hentschel B, Oehler W, Strauss D, Ulrich A, Malich A. Definition of the CTV prostate in CT and MRI by using CT-MRI image fusion in IMRT planning for prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2011;187:183-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-010-2179-1
  15. Malone S, Croke J, Roustan-Delatour N, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of four consensus guidelines and dosimetric evaluation of 3D-CRT versus tomotherapy IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;84:725-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.081
  16. Park JS, Park W, Pyo HR, et al. Suggestion for the prostatic fossa clinical target volume in adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after a radical prostatectomy. Radiother Oncol 2014;110:240-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.01.001