Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제43권4호
  • /
  • Pages.41.1-41.7
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the ability of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue instruments to reach the full working length with or without glide path preparation

  • Adiguzel, Mehmet (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University) ;
  • Tufenkci, Pelin (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University)
  • 투고 : 2018.06.19
  • 심사 : 2018.09.05
  • 발행 : 2018.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to compare the mean preparation times and frequency with which Reciproc and Reciproc Blue instruments reached the full working length in mandibular molars, with or without glide path preparation. Materials and Methods: Previously untreated mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals with completely formed apices were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 50) depending on the usage of Reciproc (RC; VDW), Reciproc Blue (RC Blue; VDW), C-Pilot (CP; VDW), and R-Pilot (RP; VDW) files: RC, RC Blue, RC + C-Pilot (RC-CP), RC-Blue + C-Pilot (RC Blue-CP), RC+R-Pilot (RC-RP), and RC Blue + R-Pilot (RC Blue-RP). A glide path was prepared using the hand-operated C-Pilot or the machine-operated R-Pilot instruments, respectively. The ${\chi}^2$ test, analysis of variance, and the Tukey post hoc test were used for statistical comparisons. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the distribution of the frequency of reaching the full working length in the RC (94%), RC Blue (88%), RC-CP (94%), RC Blue-CP (90%), RC-RP (96%), and RC Blue-RP (92%) groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Preparation of a glide path did not have a significant effect on reaching the full working length using these systems.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adiguzel M, Capar ID. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne and WaveOne Gold small, primary, and large instruments. J Endod 2017;43:623-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.021
  2. Topcuoglu HS, Topcuoglu G. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue and Reciproc files in an s-shaped canal. J Endod 2017;43:1679-1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.009
  3. Keskin C, Inan U, Demiral M, Keles A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue, Reciproc, and WaveOne Gold reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2017;43:1360-1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.036
  4. Adiguzel M, Turgay B. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue nickeltitanium instruments in artificial canals with single and double (S-shaped) curvatures. Eur Endod J 2017;2:32. https://doi.org/10.5152/eej.2017.17038
  5. Yilmaz A, Kucukay ES, Istektepe M, Sisli SN, Ersev H, Karagoz-Kucukay I. Comparison of the shaping ability of WaveOne Reciprocating files with or without glide path in simulated curved S-shaped root canals. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2017;7:S13-S17. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_32_17
  6. Patino PV, Biedma BM, Liebana CR, Cantatore G, Bahillo JG. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod 2005;31:114-116.
  7. Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, Pasqualini D. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments. J Endod 2004;30:228-230. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200404000-00011
  8. Paleker F, van der Vyver PJ. Glide path enlargement of mandibular molar canals by using K-Files, the ProGlider File, and G-Files: a comparative study of the preparation times. J Endod 2017;43:609-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.025
  9. Coelho MS, Fontana CE, Kato AS, de Martin AS, da Silveira Bueno CE. Effects of glide path on the centering ability and preparation time of two reciprocating instruments. Iran Endod J 2016;11:33-37.
  10. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira JF Jr, Soares RG, Souza LC, Oliveira JC, Lopes WS, Mangelli M. Mechanical behavior of pathfinding endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012;38:1417-1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.005
  11. Keskin C, Inan U, Demiral M, Keles A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider, and ProGlider glide path instruments. Clin Oral Investig 2018 Feb 17. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2391-4. [Epub ahead of print].
  12. De-Deus G, Arruda TE, Souza EM, Neves A, Magalhaes K, Thuanne E, Fidel RA. The ability of the Reciproc R25 instrument to reach the full root canal working length without a glide path. Int Endod J 2013;46:993-998. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12091
  13. Bartols A, Robra BP, Walther W. The ability of Reciproc instruments to reach full working length without glide path preparation: a clinical retrospective study. PeerJ 2017;5:e3583. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3583
  14. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
  15. Aydin U, Karataslioglu E. Evaluation of canal transportation after preparation with Reciproc single-file systems with or without glide path files. J Conserv Dent 2017;20:230-233. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.219191
  16. Rodrigues E, De-Deus G, Souza E, Silva EJ. Safe mechanical preparation with reciprocation movement without glide path creation: result from a pool of 673 root canals. Braz Dent J 2016;27:22-27. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600334
  17. De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Vieira VT, Belladonna FG, Elias CN, Plotino G, Grande NM. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files. J Endod 2017;43:462-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.039
  18. Ozyurek T, Gundogar M, Uslu G, Yilmaz K, Staffoli S, Nm G, Plotino G, Polimeni A. Cyclic fatigue resistances of Hyflex EDM, WaveOne Gold, Reciproc Blue and 2shape NiTi rotary files in different artificial canals. Odontology 2018;106:408-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0340-y
  19. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 2003;36:93-99. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00628.x
  20. Berutti E, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Chiandussi G, Pera F, Migliaretti G, Pasqualini D. Use of nickeltitanium rotary PathFile to create the glide path: comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals. J Endod 2009;35:408-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.021

피인용 문헌

  1. Comparison of postoperative pain intensity following the use of three different instrumentation techniques: A randomized clinical trial vol.13, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.021
  2. Evaluation of type of kinematics on glide path procedures and torsional fatigue resistance after preparation of moderately curved canals vol.35, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0064