대한지역사회작업치료학회지 (The Journal of Korean society of community based occupational therapy)

대한지역사회작업치료학회 (Korean Society of Community Based Occupational Therapy Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학생의 감각처리특성에 따른 여가활동과 자기효능감

Leisure Activities and Self-efficacy according to Sensory Processing Feature of University Students

  • 이춘엽 (가야대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 박영주 (세한대학교 작업치료학과)
  • 투고 : 2018.11.20
  • 심사 : 2018.12.24
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적 : 본 연구는 대학생의 감각처리특성에 따른 여가활동과 자기효능감을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 본 연구는 2018년 3월부터 동년 6월까지 설문조사방법을 실시하였다. 전라지역과 경상지역의 대학생 235명을 대상으로 감각처리특성을 알아보기 위해 청소년/성인 감각프로파일(Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile)을 사용하였고, 여가활동을 알아보기 위해 여가활동 설문지를 사용하였으며, 자기효능감을 알아보기 위해 자기효능감척도(Self-Efficacy Scale)를 사용하였다. 대학생의 여가활동 빈도를 파악하고, 감각처리특성에 따른 여가활동 빈도와 자기효능감, 감각찾기 유형의 특성에 따른 여가활동을 알아보았다. 결과 : 대학생의 감각처리특성에 따른 여가활동 빈도 및 자기효능감을 보면, 여가활동 빈도는 감각찾기 유형만 통계학적으로 유의한 차이가 있었고, 자기효능감은 모든 감각처리유형의 특성에 따라 유의한 차이가 나타났다(p<.05). 감각찾기 유형의 특성에 따른 여가활동은 헬스, TV시청, 쇼핑, 인터넷 검색과 웹서핑에서 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내었다(p<.05, p<.01). 결론 : 대학생의 감각찾기 유형에서 특성에 따라 여가활동과 자기효능감은 차이를 나타내었다. 대학생의 여가활동을 장려하고 그들의 자기효능감을 향상시키기 위해 감각처리특성에 대한 이해를 기반으로 한 중재적 접근이 필요할 것이다.

Objective : This study was conducted to investigate the leisure activities and self-efficacy according to sensory processing feature of university students. Methods : The survey was conducted from March to June, 2018. A total of 235 university students in Jeolla and Gyeongsang area participated. We used Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profiles to investigate sensory processing feature, Leisure Activity Questionnaires to examine leisure activities, and Self-Efficacy Scale for self-efficacy. This study identified the frequency of leisure activities of university students, the frequency of leisure activities and self-efficiency according to the sensory processing feature, and the leisure activities according to the feature of sensory seeking. Results : For the frequency of leisure activities and self-efficacy according to sensory processing feature of university students, only sensory seeking showed significantly difference in the leisure activity frequency, and the self-efficacy was significantly difference according to the feature of all types of sensory processing (p<.05). In addition, this study identified that leisure activities according to the feature of sensory seeking showed a significantly difference in gym, watching TV, shopping, internet search and web surfing (p<.05, p<.01). Conclusion : According to sensory seeking feature of university students, leisure activities and self-efficacy showed a significant difference. In order to encourage leisure activities of university students and to improve their self-efficacy, an interventional approach based on an understanding of sensory processing characteristics will be needed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 한국정보화진흥원. (2013). 2013 국가정보화 백서.
  2. Ahn, B. W., & Hwang, S. H. (2012). Relationship between leisure competence, flow, leisure satisfaction, and self-efficacy in leisure sports participants. Journal of Leisure Studies, 9(3), 1-19.
  3. American Occupational Therapy Association (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Suppl. 1), S1-S48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy; The exercise of control. New York; Freeman.
  5. Brown, C. E., & Dunn, W. (2002). Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile. San Antonio; A Harcourt Assessment Company.
  6. Cho, M. K. (2014). The relationship among smart phone use motivations, addiction, and self-control in nursing students. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(5), 311-323. doi:10.14400/JDC.2014.12.5.311
  7. Choi, J. D., Kim, J. K., & Lee, T. Y. (2010). Relationship between sensory processing styles and personality. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 18(1), 23-30.
  8. Choi, Y. H. (2017). The effects of club activity on career decision-making self efficacy and career maturity of fine arts college students. Unpublished master's thesis, Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  9. Chon, T. J. (2009). The influence of leisure motivation on leisure and life satisfaction of college students. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies, 36(2), 1087-1097.
  10. Dunn, W. (1997). The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives young children and their families: A conceptual model. Infants Young Child, 9(4), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-199704000-00005
  11. Han, H. J. (2002). The effects of self assertiveness training on the development of children's self-efficacy. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul.
  12. Hong, E. K., & Park, Y. J. (2016). Sensory processing pattern and its relation to depression and anxiety of university students. Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 14(2), 22-32.
  13. Ismael, N. T., Lawson, L. A., & Cox, J. A. (2015). The relationship between children's sensory processing patterns and their leisure preferences and participation patterns. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(5), 316-324. doi: 10.1177/0008417415577421.
  14. Jimenez, J. J. (2017). Leisure activities and hobbies preferred by third year college students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(2), 21-25.
  15. Kim, C. W. (2001). The effects of leisure attitude on physical education as a liberal arts and circle activity among university students. Journal of Korean Society for the Study of Physical Education, 5(2), 126-134.
  16. Kim, H. R., & Lee, K. W. (2009). The relationship between the participation of the university student in the leisure activity and wellness inventory. Journal of Leisure and Recreation Studies, 33(3), 85-94.
  17. Kim, J. H., & Kim, J. S. (2009). University student's preferable leisure activities and places in conjunction with time and distance. Journal of Aviation Management Society of Korea, 7(2), 33-47.
  18. Ko, Y. T. (2006). A study on the university students' leisure participation and life satisfaction by leisure types. Unpublished master's thesis, Soonchunhyang University, Asan.
  19. Lee, J. H., Lee, G. S., & Eum, J. J. (2005). The relationship between leisure activities and leisure satisfaction in university students. Journal of Korea Sport Research, 16(5), 401-411.
  20. Lee, J. K. (2005). The relationship among creativity, work preference, and academic self-efficacy for the students in the university. Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(2), 413-432.
  21. Lee, K. H., & Kim J. Y. (2014). A study on the relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning motivation, course satisfaction, and academic achievement of college students. International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 17(4), 33-57.
  22. Lee, S. W. (2004). A study on the real state of old people's leisure activity and direction of leisure policy. Unpublished master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul.
  23. Lee, T. Y. (2012). Correlations between quality of life and sensory processing abilities in older adults. Journal of Korea Contents Association, 12(5), 272-279. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.05.272
  24. Park, M. H., & Kim, K. M. (2006). The necessity for adult's sensory processing evaluating tool and the introduction of Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile. Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 4(1), 17-28.
  25. Raine, A., Reynolds, C., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. A. (2002). Stimulation seeking and intelligence; A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 663-674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.663
  26. Sim, J. M. (2003). Leisure boredom and leisure motivation experienced by college students in their daily leisure. Journal of Leisure Studies, 14(3), 85-111.
  27. Sim, J. M. (2016). University Students' Academic Performance and Physical Leisure. Tourism Research, 41(4), 127-148.