DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block under dexmedetomidine sedation versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective pilot study

  • Do, Wangseok (Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University, School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Ah-Reum (Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University, School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Jung (Department of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Hyae-Jin (Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University, School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Eunsoo (Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University, School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Heon-Jeong (Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University, School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.01.29
  • Accepted : 2018.04.09
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

Background: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been performed under regional and general anesthesia (GA). The general anesthesia versus local anesthesia for carotid surgery study compared the two techniques and concluded that there was no difference in perioperative outcomes. However, since this trial, new sedative agents have been introduced and devices that improve the delivery of regional anesthesia (RA) have been developed. The primary purpose of this pilot study was to compare intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative outcomes between GA and ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block (UGSCPB) under dexmedetomidine sedation for CEA. Methods: Medical records from 43 adult patients who underwent CEA were retrospectively reviewed, including 16 in the GA group and 27 in the RA group. GA was induced with propofol and maintained with sevoflurane. The UGSCPB was performed with ropivacaine under dexmedetomidine sedation. We compared the intraoperative requirement for vasoactive drugs, postoperative complications, pain scores using the numerical rating scale, and the duration of hospital stay. Results: There was no difference between groups in the use of intraoperative antihypertensive drugs. However, intraoperative inotropic and vasopressor agents were more frequently required in the GA group (p<0.0001). In the GA group, pain scores were significantly higher during the first 24 h after surgery (p<0.0001 between 0-6 h, p<0.004 between 6-12 h, and p<0.001 between 12-24 h). The duration of hospital stay was significantly more in the GA group ($13.3{\pm}4.6days$ in the GA group vs. $8.5{\pm}2.4days$ in the RA group, p<0.001). Conclusion: In this pilot study, intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative outcomes were better in the RA compared to the GA group.

Keywords

References

  1. GALA Trial Collaborative Group; Lewis SC, Warlow CP, Bodenham AR, Colam B, Rothwell PM, et al. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008;372:2132-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61699-2
  2. Guay J. Regional anesthesia for carotid surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008;21:638-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e328308bb70
  3. Martusevicius R, Swiatek F, Joergensen LG, Nielsen HB. Ultrasound-guided locoregional anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a prospective observational study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012;44:27-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.008
  4. Sidorowicz M, Owczuk R, Kwiecińska B, Wujtewicz MA, Wojciechowski J, Wujtewicz M. Dexmedetomidine sedation for carotid endarterectomy. Anestezjol Intens Ter 2009;41:78-83.
  5. Bekker AY, Basile J, Gold M, Riles T, Adelman M, Cuff G, et al. Dexmedetomidine for awake carotid endarterectomy: efficacy, hemodynamic profile, and side effects. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2004;16:126-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008506-200404000-00004
  6. McCutcheon CA, Orme RM, Scott DA, Davies MJ, McGlade DP. A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus conventional therapy for sedation and hemodynamic control during carotid endarterectomy performed under regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2006;102:668-75. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000197777.62397.d5
  7. Tangkanakul C, Counsell CE, Warlow CP. Local versus general anaesthesia in carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review of the evidence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;13:491-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(97)80178-5
  8. Vaniyapong T, Chongruksut W, Rerkasem K. Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(12):CD000126.
  9. Lirk P, Picardi S, Hollmann MW. Local anaesthetics: 10 essentials. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014;31:575-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000137
  10. Pandit JJ, Satya-Krishna R, Gration P. Superficial or deep cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review of complications. Br J Anaesth 2007;99:159-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem160
  11. Hadzic A. Hadzic's peripheral nerve blocks and anatomy for ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2012. p. 346-51.
  12. Marhofer P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Kettner SC, Kirchmair L. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: part 1. Br J Anaesth 2010;104:538-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq069
  13. Demirel S, Celi de la Torre JA, Bruijnen H, Martin E, Popp E, Bockler D, et al. Effect of Superficial Cervical Plexus Block on Baroreceptor Sensitivity in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2016;30:309-16. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2015.08.026
  14. Merle JC, Mazoit JX, Desgranges P, Abhay K, Rezaiguia S, Dhonneur G, et al. A comparison of two techniques for cervical plexus blockade: evaluation of efficacy and systemic toxicity. Anesth Analg 1999;89:1366-70.
  15. de Sousa AA, Filho MA, Faglione W Jr, Carvalho GT. Superficial vs combined cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy: a prospective, randomized study. Surg Neurol 2005;63(Suppl 1):S22-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2004.09.011
  16. Michenfelder JD, Sundt TM, Fode N, Sharbrough FW. Isoflurane when compared to enflurane and halothane decreases the frequency of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Anesthesiology 1987;67:336-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198709000-00010
  17. Umbrain V, Keeris J, D'Haese J, Verborgh C, Debing E, Van den Brande P, et al. Isoflurane, desflurane and sevoflurane for carotid endarterectomy. Anaesthesia 2000;55:1052-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01617.x
  18. Hartsell PA, Calligaro KD, Syrek JR, Dougherty MJ, Raviola CA. Postoperative blood pressure changes associated with cervical block versus general anesthesia following carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 1999;13:104-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100169900227
  19. Gassner M, Bauman Z, Parish S, Koenig C, Martin J, Hans S. Hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under cervical block and general anesthesia. Ann Vasc Surg 2014;28:1680-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2014.03.029
  20. McKevitt FM, Sivaguru A, Venables GS, Cleveland TJ, Gaines PA, Beard JD, et al. Effect of treatment of carotid artery stenosis on blood pressure: a comparison of hemodynamic disturbances after carotid endarterectomy and endovascular treatment. Stroke 2003;34:2576-81. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000097490.88015.3A
  21. McCleary AJ, Dearden NM, Dickson DH, Watson A, Gough MJ. The differing effects of regional and general anaesthesia on cerebral metabolism during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;12:173-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(96)80103-1
  22. Gottlieb A, Satariano-Hayden P, Schoenwald P, Ryckman J, Piedmonte M. The effects of carotid sinus nerve blockade on hemodynamic stability after carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997;11:67-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-0770(97)90256-1
  23. Hoefer J, Pierer E, Rantner B, Stadlbauer KH, Fraedrich G, Fritz J, et al. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy induces early hemodynamic and stress hormone changes. J Vasc Surg 2015;62:57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.02.036
  24. Piascik MT, Soltis EE, Piascik MM, Macmillan LB. Alphaadrenoceptors and vascular regulation: molecular, pharmacologic and clinical correlates. Pharmacol Ther 1996;72:215-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7258(96)00117-9
  25. Ebert TJ, Hall JE, Barney JA, Uhrich TD, Colinco MD. The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Anesthesiology 2000;93:382-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200008000-00016
  26. Jamil M, Usman R, Ghaffar S. Advantages of selective use of intraluminal shunt in carotid endarterectomy: a study of 122 cases. Ann Vasc Dis 2016;9:285-8. https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.16-00036
  27. Kong J, Li J, Ye Z, Fan X, Wen J, Zhang J, et al. Carotid endarterectomy with routine shunt for patients with contralateral carotid occlusion. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;23:227-32. https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00017
  28. Khattar NK, Friedlander RM, Chaer RA, Avgerinos ED, Kretz ES, Balzer JR, et al. Perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy: etiology and implications. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016;158:2377-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2966-2
  29. Shin SW, Cho AR, Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Byeon GJ, Yoon JW, et al. Maintenance anaesthetics during remifentanil-based anaesthesia might affect postoperative pain control after breast cancer surgery. Br J Anaesth 2010;105:661-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq257
  30. Dakour Aridi H, Paracha N, Nejim B, Locham S, Malas MB. Anesthetic type and hospital outcomes after carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative database. J Vasc Surg 2018;67:1419-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.028
  31. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175-91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Cited by

  1. Cardiac output and cerebral blood flow during carotid surgery in regional versus general anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study vol.74, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.042