벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제13권2호
  • /
  • Pages.15-26
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

신용문제에 따른 재창업기업 성과 결정 요인에 대한 실증연구

An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Re-startup Firm's Performance by the Condition of Credit Problems

  • Kim, In Sue (KAIST Center for Science-based Entrepreneurship) ;
  • Lee, Taek Ku (Planning & Coordination Office, Daejeon Metropolitan City)
  • 투고 : 2018.02.23
  • 심사 : 2018.04.30
  • 발행 : 2018.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 실패 이후, 재창업을 하는 기업인들을 대상으로 실패 경험, 재창업 동기, 정부지원사업경험과 재창업교육 등이 재창업기업성과에 미치는 영향과 함께, 상기 4가지 요인들이 채무/신용문제에 따라 재창업기업성과에 미치는 영향이 어떻게 변하는지 분석하였다. 분석결과 실패경험은 재창업기업성과에 유의미한 영향이 없게 나타난 반면, 재창업동기와 정부지원사업경험 그리고 재창업교육은 재창업기업성과에 유의미한 영향을 미치고 있었다. 한편, 신용문제를 고려한 분석에서는 상기 4가지 요인들 모두 신용문제의 유무에 따라 재창업기업 성과에 서로 다른 영향을 보이고 있다. 신용문제가 없는 재창업 그룹에서 재창업동기와 실패경험이 재창업기업성과에 유의미한 영향을 미치고 있는 반면, 신용문제가 있는 재창업 그룹에서는 정부지원사업경험과 재창업교육 참여가 재창업기업성과에 유의미한 영향을 미치고 있었다. 본 연구결과 첫째, 신용문제 유무에 따라 재창업기업성과에 영향을 미치는 요인들이 다르다는 것을 보여주고 있다. 이는 실패 및 재창업 관한 연구 뿐 아니라, 재창업 정책 개발을 함에 있어 신용문제에 따른 차별적 접근이 필요하다는 점을 말하고 있으며, 둘째, 실패경험이 재창업기업성과에 영향이 없게 나온 것은 폐업 후 재창업까지 소요되는 기간 (평균 56개월, 단, 경우에 따라 2년~ 7년 이상이 소요)이 실패경험이 자산화되는데 영향이 미칠 수 있기 때문이라는 것을 추정 할 수 있었다. 이는 기존 연구에서 다루지 않았던 부분으로 향후, 실패경험과 재창업에 대한 직/간접 영향을 연구하고, 정책을 수립할 때, 진부화라는 개념에서 실패 이후 재창업까지 소요되는 기간을 고려해야 할 필요성을 제시하고 있다.

This study examines the effects of failure experience, re-startup's motivation, government support business and education for re-startup on the performance of re-startup firms after failure. In addition, we analyzed how the above factors affect the performance of re-startup firms by the condition of debt and credit problems. As a result of the analysis, the failure experience had no significant effect on the re-startup performance regardless of the credit problem, while re-startup's motivation, government support business and education for re-startup had a significant effect on re-startup firms' performance. In the re-startup group with the credit problem, the re-startup's motivation and the failure experience had a significant influence on the re-startup firms' performance. On the other hand, in the group that did not solve the credit problem, the re-startup's motivation and the failure experience had no significant effect on the re-startup performance, but the government support business and education for re-startup had a significant effect on re-startup performance. The results of this study are as follows: First, it shows that the characteristics of re-startups and the determinants of re-startups are different according to credit problems. Second, this study shows that it takes 56 months on average from the close of business to the re-start, and it may take more than 7 years due to the credit problems and bankruptcy. This suggests the necessity to consider re-startup in the concept of obsolete in consideration of time, when studying the direct/indirect influence of failure experience and re-startup, and establishing policy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Audretsch, D., & Mahmood, T.(1995). New Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 97-103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109995
  2. Bae, Y. I.(2014). Performance Drivers of Entrepreneurial Restarts, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, Vol.9 No.3 pp.13-22
  3. Barney, J.(2012). Purchasing, Supply Chain Management and Sustained Competitive Advantage: The Relevance of Resource-based Theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48, 3-6.
  4. Begley, T., & Body, D.(1987). Psychological Characteristics Associated with Performance in Entrepreneurial Firms and Smaller Businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90020-6
  5. Callejon, M., & Garcia-Quevedo, J.(2005). Public subsidies to business R&D: do they stimulate private expenditures? Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 23, 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0428
  6. Catozzella, A., & M. Vivarelli(2014.) The Catalysing Role of In-House R&D in Fostering Complementarity Among Innovative Inputs. Industry and Innovation, 21, 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2014.910890
  7. Choo, F., & Trotman, K.(1991). The Relationship Between Knowledge Structure and Judgments for Experienced and Inexperienced auditors. Accounting Review, 66, 464-485.
  8. Cope, J.(2005). Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 373-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00090.x
  9. Cope, J., Cave, F. & Eccles, S.(2008). The Impact and Outcomes of Venture Failure: An Entrepreneurial Learning Perspective (Summary), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 28(Iss. 4), Article 4.
  10. Delmar, F., & Shane, S.(2004). Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 385-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00037-5
  11. Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S., & Wiltbank, R.(2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 287-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002
  12. Dimov, D.(2010). Nascent Entrepreneurs and Venture Emergence: Opportunity Confidence, Human Capital, and Early Planning. 47, 1123-1153.
  13. Gabrielsson, J., & Politis, D.(2011). Career motives and entrepreneurial decision-making: examining preferences for causal and effectual logics in the early stage of new ventures. Small Business Economics, 36, 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9217-3
  14. Gino, F., & Pisano, G.(2011). Why Leaders Don't Learn From Success. Harvard Business Review, 89, 68-74.
  15. Gnyawali, D. R., & Fogel, D. S.(1994). Environments for entrepreneurship development: key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 18, 43-43.
  16. Gonzalez, X., Jaumandreu, J., & Pazo, C.(2005). Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness. Rand Journal of Economics, 36, 930-950.
  17. Greenberger, D. B. & Sexton, D. L.(1988). An interactive model of new venture initiation. Journal of Small Business Management, 26, 1-7.
  18. Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S.(2015). New technology-based firms in Europe: market penetration, public venture capital, and timing of investment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24, 1109-1148. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu025
  19. Ha, K. S.(2010), Factors Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention from Business Attitude and Fear on Business Failure, Korea Corporation Management Review, Vol.19 No.5 pp59-74
  20. Hmieleski, K., & Baron, R.(2009). Entrepreneurs' Optimism and new Venture Performance: A Social Cognitive Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 473-488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41330755
  21. Kim, C. B., & Lee, S. H.(2017). A Study on Influence of Entrepreneur Behavior Characteristics on Business Performance According to the Entrepreneurial Support System, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship Vol.12 No.2 pp.41-54
  22. Kim, I. S., Yang, T., & Chang, H. J.(2015). Determinant of external sourcing for Smes in Korea: analysing the effect of sub-constructs of entrepreneurial orientation on outside technological partnership from the multi-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 19, 234-255. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2015.069949
  23. King, A., & Tucci, C.(2002). Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Science, 48, 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.2.171.253
  24. Krueger, N. F., & Brazeal, D. V.(1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 18, 91-91.
  25. Lee, B. G., & Jeon, I.O.(2014), The effect of entrepreneurial motivation on the entrepreneurial performance focusing on potential entrepreneurs and entrepreneurs: Mediating role of entrepreneurship, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship Vol.9 No.6 pp.213-230 https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.9.6.201412.213
  26. Madsen, P., & Desai, V.(2010). Failing to Learn? The Effects of Failure and Success on Organizational Learning in The Global Orbital Launch Vehicle Industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 451-476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51467631
  27. McGrath, R.(1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24, 13-30. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580438
  28. Mcmullan, W., & Vesper, K.(1987). New Ventures and Small Business Innovaton for Economic-Growth. R&D Management, 17, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1987.tb00043.x
  29. Politis, D., & Gabrielsson, J.(2009). Entrepreneurs' attitudes towards failure: an experiential learning approach, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 15(4), 364-383. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550910967921
  30. Rojas, F. & Huergo, E.(2016). Characteristics of entrepreneurs and public support for NTBFs. Small Business Economics, 47, 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9718-9
  31. Ronstadt, R.(1988). The Corridor Principle. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(88)90028-6
  32. Sexton, D. L., & Bowman, N.(1985). The entrepreneur: A capable executive and more. Journal of business venturing, 1, 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(85)90012-6
  33. Shepherd, D.(2004). Educating Entrepreneurship Students About Emotion and Learning From Failure. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 274-287. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2004.14242217
  34. Shepherd, D., Covin, J., & Kuratko, D.(2009). Project failure from corporate entrepreneurship: Managing the grief process. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 588-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.009
  35. Shepherd, D. A.(2011). Multilevel entrepreneurship research: Opportunities for studying entrepreneurial decision making. Journal of Management, 37(2), 412-420 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310369940
  36. Starr, J., & Bygrave, W.(1991). The assets and liabilities of prior start-up experience: An exploratory study of multiple venture entrepreneurs. In: N. C. Churchill, W. D. Bygrave, J. G. Covin, D. L. Sexton, D. P. Slevin, K. H. Vesper, and W. E. Wetzel (eds.): Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1991. Wellesley, MA: Babson College, 213-227.
  37. Stokes, D, & Blackburn, R.(2002). Learning the hard way: the lessons of owner-managers who have closed their businesses, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development , 9(Issue: 1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000210419455
  38. Stuart, R., & Abetti, P(1990). Impact of Entrepreneurial and Management Experience on Early Performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90029-S
  39. Ucbasaran, D., Lockett, A. Wright, M., & Westhead, P.(2003). Entrepreneurial founder teams: Factors associated with member entry and exit. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 107-127. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6520.2003.00034.x
  40. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Flores, M.(2010). The nature of entrepreneurial experience, business failure and comparative optimism. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 541-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.04.001
  41. Wallsten, S.(2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. Rand Journal of Economics, 31, 82-100. https://doi.org/10.2307/2601030
  42. West, G., & Noel, T.(2009). The Impact of Knowledge Resources on New Venture Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 47, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00259.x
  43. Wood, R., Bandura, A., & Bailey, T.(1990). Mechanisms Governing Organizational Performance in Complex Decision-making Environments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90028-8
  44. Yu, J., & Chen, S.(2016). Gender moderates firms' innovation performance and entrepreneurs' self-efficacy and risk propensity. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 44, 679-691. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.4.679