Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Key Factors in the Implementation of Research Data Management Services

연구데이터 관리서비스의 구현 시 고려사항에 관한 연구

  • 김성훈 (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 오삼균 (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2018.05.23
  • Accepted : 2018.06.11
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine crucial factors of consideration in ensuring the successful implementation of research data management services. The study begins by extracting a range of service areas from their equivalent in existing research on data management services. It then collects relevant information via e-mail survey from eight individuals respectively overseeing research data management services at six university libraries and one institution located throughout the United States, Germany, and Australia. Having originated in overseas cases, the resulting factors of consideration were reviewed by domestic experts in research data management services. The finalized areas of research data management services consist of nine categories. The crucial factors of consideration in RDM services are connection between research services and research data management services; national/university-level/institutional agreements; metadata entry personnel and required elements; strategies for the provision of specialized staff; major service area selection through user demand analysis; effective linkage between research data and research results; and close cooperation with users and related organizations.

본 연구의 목적은 연구데이터 관리서비스 구현 시 성공적인 서비스를 위한 고려사항을 도출하는 것이다. 이를 위해 선행연구를 활용하여 연구데이터 관리서비스의 영역을 파악하였고, 미국, 독일, 호주에서 연구데이터 관리서비스를 시행중인 대학도서관 6곳과 1개의 기관에서 담당자 8명을 대상으로 연구데이터 서비스에 관한 질문의 답변을 이메일을 통해 수집하였다. 또 해외서비스를 대상으로 수집한 고려사항이 국내에 적용가능한지 국내 연구데이터 관리서비스 전문가와 검토하였다. 연구데이터 서비스 영역은 총 9개의 카테고리로 구분하여 분석하였는데, 연구서비스와 연구데이터 관리서비스 연계, 국가/대학/기관 차원의 협약, 메타데이터 입력주체 및 필수 요소, 직원의 전문화 방안, 이용자 요구분석을 통한 주요서비스 영역 선정, 연구데이터와 연구결과물의 효과적인 연결방안, 이용자와 유관기관과 긴밀한 공조 등의 연구데이터 관리서비스 구축 시 고려사항을 도출할 수 있었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Kang, HeeJong (2012). Key resources in 21st century, policy tasks on use of national scientific data. STEPI Insight, (91), 1-26.
  2. Kim, SunTae, Hahn, SunHwa, Lee, Taeyoung, & Kim, Yong (2010). A study on a model for using and preserving scientific data. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 21(4), 81-93.
  3. Kim, EunJeong, & Nam, TaeWoo (2012). Factor analysis of effects on research data collection. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(2), 27-44. http://dx.doi.Org/10.3743/K08IM.2012.29.2.027
  4. Kim, JiHyun (2014). A study on research data management services of research university libraries in the U.S. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 25(3), 165-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.165
  5. Seoul National University (2010). Seoul National University Research Ethics Guidelines
  6. Shim, WonSik (2015). Developing a roadmap for national research data management governance: based on the analysis of united kingdom's case. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(4), 355-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.355
  7. Shim, WonSik (2016). A case study of u.s. academic libraries' research data support services. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 311-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.31
  8. Lee, SangHwan, & Shim, WonSik (2009). Sharing and Utilizing for Scientific Data. KISTI Knowlege Report, 5.
  9. Bouma, G. D., & Ling, R. (2004). The Research Process. South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
  10. Carlson, J. (2018, January 28). email interview with the author.
  11. Cox, A. M., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(4), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000613492542
  12. Hedstrom, M., & Jinfang, N. (2008). Incentives for data producers to create "archive/ready" data: Implications for archives and records management. In Proceedings from the Society of American Archivists Research Forum.
  13. Helbig, K. (2018, February 12). email interview with the author.
  14. Jones, S., Pryor, G., & Whyte, A. (2013). 'How to Develop Research Data Management Services-a guide for HEIs'. DCC How-to Guides. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Available online: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides
  15. Kozlowski, W. A. (2018, January 30). email interview with the author.
  16. Muilenburg, J. S. (2018, February 2). email interview with the author.
  17. Perry, C. M. (2008). Archiving of publicly funded research data: A survey of Canadian researchers. Government Information Quarterly, 25(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.008
  18. Simons, N., & Yu, F. (2018, February 3). email interview with the author.
  19. Wolf, N., & Steeves, V. (2018, February 17). email interview with the author.