정보화정책 (Informatization Policy)

한국지능정보사회진흥원 (National Information Society Agency)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

범죄 대응을 위한 경찰 영상장비의 활용과 법 동향

Application of Police Video Equipment for Fighting Crime and Legal Trends

  • 이훈 (조선대학교 경찰행정학과) ;
  • 이원상 (조선대학교 법학과)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.18
  • 심사 : 2018.05.28
  • 발행 : 2018.06.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

경찰이 범죄예방과 수사를 위해 영상장비를 활용하고 있는 것은 비단 최근의 일만은 아니다. 과거 캠코더나 열화상 카메라와 같은 새로운 영상장비들이 개발되어 사용되면서부터 꾸준히 범죄에 대응하기 위한 수단으로 사용되어 왔다. 하지만 최근 들어 지능형 CCTV나 드론의 영상장비, 개량된 열화상 카메라 등과 같이 관련 기술들이 더욱 진화하고, 해당 영상 장비들을 범죄대응 목적으로 사용할 수 있는 근거 법령들이 뒷받침 되면서 그 활용범위가 보다 넓어지고 있다. 그에 따라 범죄예방 목적 뿐 아니라 범죄수사, 형사소송절차에도 널리 사용되고 있다. 그러나 영상장비의 활용이 많아짐에 따라 다양한 문제점들도 제기되고 있다. 최근 범죄대응 영상장비의 활용과 관련된 문헌들을 살펴보면 근거규정 미비, 개인정보 침해 위험성, 사생활 자유침해, 그리고 영상장비의 보안침해에 대해 꾸준히 문제점들을 제시하고 있다. 앞으로 영상장비는 보다 다양한 모습으로 범죄대응을 위해서 사용될 것이고, 그 기술 또한 더욱 발전할 것이다. 하지만 지금 시점에서 제기되고 있는 문제점을 해결하지 않는다면 앞으로 더욱 큰 문제들이 발생할 수 있다. 따라서 입법자들과 정부는 제기되는 문제점들을 면밀히 검토하여 영상장비들이 시민의 인권을 침해하지 않으면서 시민의 안전을 위해 활용될 수 있도록 노력해야 할 것이다.

With the introduction of video cameras into law enforcement, a great deal of police organizations have adopted the technology in their routine crime prevention activities. The up-to-date systems of ambient surveillance energized by CCTV, police wearable cameras, drones, and thermal imaging devices enable the police to thoroughly monitor public spaces as well as to rigorously arrest on-scene criminals. These efforts to improve the level of surveillance are often met with public resistance raising concerns over citizens' rights to privacy. Recent studies on the use of police video equipment have constantly raised the issues related to the lack of applicable legal provisions, risk of personal information and privacy infringement as well as security vulnerabilities. In this regard, the present study attempted to review the public surveillance methods currently used by law enforcement agencies worldwide within the context of public safety and individual rights to privacy. Furthermore, the present study also discussed the legal boundaries of police use of video equipment to address public concerns over privacy issues.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강욱.이병석 (2016). "경찰활동에서 드론의 이용방안에 관한 연구: 대리인 이론을 중심으로." 한국경찰학회보, 15(5): 3-30.
  2. 구태언 (2012). "개인정보 보호법의 제문제" 법학평론, 3: 66-97.
  3. 김민천 (2016). "우리나라의 개인정보 보호제도 분석 - 인증 및 평가제도와 개인식별번호를 중심으로" 정보화정책, 23(4): 38-58. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2016.23.4.038
  4. 김보현 (2014). "영상녹화물에 대한 판례의 입장과 비판적 고찰" 성균관법학, 26(4): 23-37.
  5. 김용호.이경현 (2017). "드론에 의한 프라이버시 침해 방지 및 운용 상 문제 해결을 위한 입법 제안." 정보보호학회논문지, 27(5): 1141-1147. https://doi.org/10.13089/JKIISC.2017.27.5.1141
  6. 김운석 (2011). "개인정보보호 2.0시대의 개인정보보호법개관." 법학연구, 22(2): 9-42.
  7. 김원주.김홍희 (2014). "자동차용 블랙박스(사고영상기록장치) 데이터에 대한 보안기술 적용방안 연구." 정보보호학회지, 24(2): 35-41.
  8. 김재광 (2012). "개인정보보호법에 관한 새로운 법적 문제." 강원법학, 36: 95-120.
  9. 김화종 (2017). "딥러닝 시티: 스마트 시티의 빅데이터 분석 프레임워크 제안." 정보화정책, 24(4): 79-92. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2017.24.4.079
  10. 노명선.이완규 (2017). 형사소송법(제4판). 서울: SKKUP.
  11. 류성진 (2017). "드론의 프라이버시권 침해에 대한 헌법적 검토." 법학논집, 21(4): 119-146.
  12. 박수희 (2013), "영상녹화물의증거능력: 법무부 형사소송 법개정안을 중심으로." 한양법학, 24(1): 77-103.
  13. 박한호.김성환 (2017). "경찰활동상 드론규제와 활용을 위한 논의." 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(7): 408-415.
  14. 박훤일.이창규 (2016). 드론(무인비행장치) 카메라 관련 개인정보보호 가이드라인 연구, 경희대 산학협력단.
  15. 박훤일.이창규 (2016). "혁신적 신기술의 개인정보보호에 관한 국제 비교: 드론 카메라를 중심으로" 국제거래법연구, 25(2): 123-144.
  16. 방동희 (2013). "개인정보 보호법과 개인영상정보의 보호에 관한 소고 - 보호체계 현황, 문제점 및 개선방향 제시를 중심으로." 한양법학, 44: 53-79.
  17. 방승환.조현보 (2016). "CCTV 활용을 위한 실시간 범죄발생예측 모델 학습 방법." 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 21(5): 91-98.
  18. 배종대.홍영기 (2017). 형사소송법. 서울: 홍문사.
  19. 성욱준.황성수 (2017). "지능정보시대의 전망과 정책대응방향 모색." 정보화정책, 24(2): 3-19. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2017.24.2.003
  20. 손영화 (2014). "빅데이터 시대의 개인정보 보호방안." 기업법연구, 28(3): 355-393.
  21. 손동권.신이철 (2016). 형사소송법(제3판). 서울: 세창출판사.
  22. 신영진 (2008). "공공기관의 CCTV도입에 따른 개인정보보호에 관한 연구." 한국지역정보화학회지, 11(2): 1-21.
  23. 신용녀.전명근 (2014). "영상감시 시스템에서의 얼굴 영상정보보호를 위한 기술적.관리적 요구 사항." 정보보호학회논문지, 24(1): 97-106. https://doi.org/10.13089/JKIISC.2014.24.1.97
  24. 안성수 (2007). "영상녹화물의 녹화 및 증거사용방법." 법학연구, 10(1): 31-48.
  25. 양주아.양문승 (2017). "경찰의 과학치안 활동 현황 및 전망." 한국경찰연구, 16(4): 147-168.
  26. 오경석.김태용.박현호 (2013). "CCTV 관제시스템 통합이 경찰업무 효율성에 미치는 영향 연구." 한국과학예술포럼, 13: 219-232.
  27. 이보성.이중엽.박유진.김범수 (2016). "무인항공기 사생활보호 방안." 정보보호학회논문지, 26(4): 1057-1071. https://doi.org/10.13089/JKIISC.2016.26.4.1057
  28. 이석호 (2014). "CCTV 개인영상 정보보호를 위한 오프라인 객체추적." 한국정보통신학회논문지, 18(12): 2961-2967. https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2014.18.12.2961
  29. 이완규 (2010). "진술 영상녹화물의 활용방향." 홍익법학, 11(2): 69-95.
  30. 이원상 (2016). "범죄예방을 위한 첨단과학기술 활용에 따른 범제도적 쟁점 고찰." 형사정책연구, 27(2): 231-262.
  31. 이창범 (2012). 개인정보보호법(초판). 서울: 법문사.
  32. 장일식.박종철 (2018). "CCTV 통합관제센터의 운영성과 및 개선 방안: 구미시를 중심으로." 경찰학논총, 13(1): 209-246.
  33. 정영훈 (2017). "경찰드론 허용범위에 대한 입법방안." 충남대학교 법학연구, 28(3): 9-39.
  34. 정웅석 (2010). "영상녹화물의 증거능력 인정에 관한 연구: 법무부 개정안을 중심으로." 형사법의 신동향, 29: 114-237.
  35. 정웅석.최창호 (2017). 형사소송법(개정7판). 서울: 대명출판사.
  36. 정재준 (2018). "사물인터넷(IoT)의 치안대책 활용 방안." 경찰학연구, 18(1): 197-228.
  37. 조기영 (2015). "증거재판주의와 새로운 증명 방법의 증거능력: 재판의 정당화 관점에서 본 영상녹화물과 조사자증언의 증거능력." 동아법학, 66: 417-448.
  38. 차건상.신용태 (2009). "CCTV설치 증가에 따른 개인영상정보보호 주요이슈." 정보과학회지, 27(12): 25-33.
  39. 차건상.신용태 (2011). "택시 영상기록장치의 프라이버시 보호 방안." 정보통신, 38(3): 223-231.
  40. 최민영 (2014). "CCTV를 통한 범죄예방의 법치국가적 한계." 고려법학, 73: 187-219.
  41. 한상암 (2006). "경찰의 범죄수사활동에 있어 디지털 영상매체의 활용에 관한 연구." 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 6(5): 153-160.
  42. 허선영.문태헌 (2015). "범죄예방을 위한 CCTV 위치 적절성 및 효과성 분석." 한국지역지리학회지, 21(4): 739-750.
  43. 허준.정연균 (2017). "드론을 이용한 범죄 및 드론을 활용한 범죄예방." 한국공안행정학회, 26(3): 357-382.
  44. 홍영기 (2009). "검사작성 피의자신문조서의 실질적 진정성립 인정방식." 형사법연구, 21(2): 227-246.
  45. 연합뉴스(2018. 5. 3.), 삼척 석회석광산에 드론이 뜬다...환경오염 단속, http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2018/05/03/0200000000AKR20180503081900062.HTML?input=1195m
  46. 연합뉴스(2015.5.25.), 몸에 다는 블랙박스 '바디캠'... 군산경찰 국내 첫 도입, http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2015/05/24/0200000000AKR20150524045200055.HTML
  47. Agustina, J. R. & Clavell, G. G. (2011). "The impact of CCTV on fundamental rights and crime prevention strategies: The case of the Catalan Control Commission of video surveillance devices." Computer Law & Security Review, 27: 168-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2011.01.006
  48. Alexandrie, G. (2017). "Surveillance cameras and crime: A review of randomized and natural experiments," Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 18(2): 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2017.1387410
  49. Ariel, B., Farrar, W. & Sutherland, A. (2015). "The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens' complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial." Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(3): 509-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3
  50. Ashby, M. (2017). "The value of CCTV surveillance cameras as an investigative tool: An empirical analysis." European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 23(3): 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-017-9341-6
  51. Balcerzak, A. & Hiegel, T. (2013). Police forces struggle to incorporate drones. Medill National Security Zone. Retrieved from http://droneproject.nationalsecurityzone.org/headline-policeforces-struggle-toincorporate-drones-ashleybalcerzak-and-taylor-hiegel/.
  52. Campisi, J. P. (2001). "The Fourth Amendment and new technologies: The constitutionality of thermal imaging." Villanova Law Review, 46(1): 241-275.
  53. Cho, J. T. & Park, J. (2017). "Exploring the effects of CCTV upon fear of crime: A multi-level approach in Seoul." International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 49(1): 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.01.005
  54. Clarke, R. V. (1997). Introduction. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed., pp. 1-43). Guilderland, NY: Harrow and Heston.
  55. Coudert, F., Butin, D, & Metayer, D. L. (2015). "Bodyworn cameras for police accountability: Opportunities and risks." Computer Law & Security Review, 31(6): 749-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.09.002
  56. Cubitt, T., Lesic, R., Myers, G. L. & Corry, R. (2017). "Body-worn video: A systematic review of literature." Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 50(3): 379-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865816638909
  57. Davis, J. P., Forrest, C., Treml, F. & Jansari, A. (2017). "Identification from CCTV: Assessing police super-recogniser ability to spot faces in a crowd and susceptibility to change blindness." Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 32(3): 337-353.
  58. Davis, J. P., Lander, K. & Jansari, A. (2013). "I never forget a face." The Psychologist, 26: 726-729.
  59. Durlauf, S. & Nagin, D. (2011). "Imprisonment and crime." Criminology & Public Policy, 10(1): 13-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00680.x
  60. Ditton, J. (2000). "Crime and the city: public attitudes towards open-street CCTV in Glasgow." British Journal of Criminology, 40(4): 692-709. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/40.4.692
  61. Ellis, T., Jenkins, C. & Smith, P. (2015). Evaluation of the introduction of personal issue body worn video cameras (Operation Hyperion) on the Isle of Wight: Final report to Hampshire Constabulary. Portsmouth, England: University of Portsmouth.
  62. Evison, M. P. (2014). "The third forensics: Images and allusions." Policing and Society, 25(1): 521-539.
  63. Farrington, D. P., Gill, M., Waples, S. J. & Argomaniz, J. (2007). "The effects of closed-circuit television on crime: Meta-analysis of an English national quasi-experimental multi-site evaluation." Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(1): 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-007-9024-2
  64. Fuqua, D. M. & Stevens, C. M. (2014). "Technology and the Fourth Amendment: History and Application of Principles of Decision in Light of New Means of Surveillance." FDCC Quarterly, 64(1): 1-25.
  65. Gettinger, D. (2017). Drones at home: Public safety drones (pp. 1-12, Rep.). Annandale-On-Hudson, NY: Center for the Study of Drone.
  66. Gill, M. & Spriggs, A. (2005). Assessing the impact of CCTV. London: Home Office (Research Study No. 292).
  67. Greenberg, M. L. (1999). "Warrantless thermal imaging may impermissibly invade home privacy: United States v. Kyllo, 140 F.3d. 1249 (9th Cir. 1998)." University of Cincinnati Law Review, 68, 151-183.
  68. Haddal, C. C. & Gertler, J. (2010). Homeland security:Unmanned aerial vehicles and border surveillance. Congressional Research Service.
  69. Heen, M. S. J., Lieberman, J. D. & Miethe, T. D. (2018). "The thin blue line meets the big blue sky: Perceptions of police legitimacy and public attitudes toward aerial drones." Criminal Justice Studies, 31(1): 18-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2017.1404463
  70. Hughes, T. W. (2001). "Thernal imaging and the Fourth Amendment: Kyllo v. U.S." American Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(1): 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886856
  71. International Association of Chiefs of Police (2003). Impact of video enhancement on modern policing. Alexandria, VA: IACP.
  72. International Association of Chiefs of Police (2004). Impact of video enhancement on modern policing: Research and best practices from the IACP study on in-car cameras. Alexandria, VA: International Association of Chiefs of Police.
  73. Jennings, W. G., Fridell, L. A. & Lynch, M. D. (2014). "Cops and cameras: Officer perceptions of the use of body-worn cameras in law enforcement." Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6): 549-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.09.008
  74. Karaca, Y., Cicek, M., Tatli, O., Sahin, A., Pasli, S., Beser, M. F. & Turedi, S. (2018). " The potential use of unmanned aircraft systems (drones) in mountain search and rescue operations." American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 36: 583-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.025
  75. Kim, S. (2014). "A study on infringement of privacy of unmanned aircraft: Focusing on the analysis of legislation and US policy." The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy, 29(2): 135-161.
  76. Kim, Y. & Park, R. (2014). "The problem of personal information infringement by the video event data recorder(automotive black-box): The necessity of legal regulation and a legislative alternative." The Journal of Police Science, 14(3): 67-88.
  77. King, J., Mulligan, D. & Raphael, S. (2008). CITRIS Report: The San Francisco community safety camera program. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of San Francisco's Community Safety Cameras. Berkeley, CA: Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society.
  78. Laur, D., LeBlanc, B., Stephen, T., Lane, P. & Taylor, D. (2010). Proof of concept study: Body worn video and in-vehicle video. Victoria, BC: Victoria Police Department.
  79. LaVigne, N., Lowry, S., Markman, J. & Dwyer, A. (2011). Evaluating the use of public surveillance cameras for crime control and prevention. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
  80. Lynch, M. (2016). Police technology. In W. Jennings (Ed.), The encyclopedia of crime and punishment (pp. 1-5). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  81. McLean, S. J., Worden, R. E. & Kim, M. (2013). "Here's looking at you: An evaluation of public CCTV cameras and their effects on crime and disorder." Criminal Justice Review, 38(3): 303-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016813492415
  82. Medwecki, M. (2009). "You can run but you can't hide...: Leveraging CCTV coverage." Business Information Review, 26(4): 244-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382109349638
  83. Miethe, T. D., Lieberman, J. D., Sakiyama, M. & Troshynski, E. I. (2014). Public attitudes about aerial drone activities: Results of a national survey (Research in Brief report). Las Vegas, NV: Center for Crime and Justice Policy.
  84. Monmouth University. (2013). National: U.S. supports unmanned domestic drones. Monmouth University Poll, August 15.
  85. Musheno, M. C., Levine, J. P. & Palumbo, D. J. (1978). "Television surveillance and crime prevention: Evaluating an attempt to create defensible space in public housing." Social Science Quarterly, 58(4): 647-656.
  86. Phoenix Strategic Perspectives Inc. (2013). Survey of Canadians on privacy related issues: Final report. Phoenix Strategic Perspectives Inc., Ottawa: Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.
  87. Piza, E. L. (2018). "The history, policy, implications, and knowledge gaps of the CCTV literature: Insights for the development of body-worn camera research." International Criminal Justice Review, 1-21.
  88. Piza, E. L., Caplan, J. M. & Kennedy, L. W. (2014). "Is the punishment more certain? An analysis of CCTV detections and enforcement." Justice Quarterly, 31(6): 1015-1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.723034
  89. Piza, E. L., Caplan, J. M., Kennedy, L. W. & Gilchrist, A. M. (2015). "The effects of merging proactive CCTV monitoring with directed police patrol: A randomized controlled trial." Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(1): 43-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9211-x
  90. Piza, E. L., Gilchrist, A. M., Caplan, J. M., Kennedy, L. W. & O'Hara, B. A. (2016). "The financial implications of merging proactive CCTV monitoring and directed patrol: A cost-benefit analysis." Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(3): 403-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9267-x
  91. Priks, M. (2014). "Do surveillance cameras affect unruly behavior? A closer look at grandstands." The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116: 1160-1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12075
  92. Reaves, B. (2015). Local police departments, 2013: Equipment and technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  93. Reid, A. A. & Andresen, M. A. (2012). "The impact of closed-circuit television in a car park on the fear of crime: Evidence from a victimization survey." Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 14(4): 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2012.7
  94. Sakiyama, M., Miethe, T. D., Lieberman, J. D., Heen, M. S. J. & Tuttle, O. (2016). "Big hover or big brother? Public attitudes about drone usage in domestic policing activities." Security Journal, 30(4): 1027-1044.
  95. Salter, M. (2014). "Toys for the boys? Drones, pleasure and popular culture in the militarisation of policing." Critical Criminology, 22(2): 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-013-9213-4
  96. Sarno, C., Hough, M., Bulos, M. (1999). Developing a picture of CCTV in Southwark Town Centres: Final report. Criminal Policy Research Unit. South Bank University, London.
  97. Scott, A. (2015). Americans ok with police drones: Private ownership, not so much. Reuters/Ipsos Online Poll. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/05/ususa-drones-pollidUSKBN0L91EE20150205
  98. Scott, N., Higgs, P., Caulkins, J. P., Aitken, C., Cogger, S. & Dietze, P. (2016). "The introduction of CCTV and associated changes in heroin purchase and injection settings in Footscray, Victoria, Australia." Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12: 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9259-x
  99. Sivarajasingam, V., Shepherd, J. & Matthews, K. (2003). "Effect of urban closed circuit television on assault injury and violence detection." Injury Prevention, 9: 312-316. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.9.4.312
  100. Sousa, W. H., Miethe, T. D. & Sakiyama, M. (2015). Body worn cameras on police: Results from a national survey of public attitudes. Las Vegas, NV: University of Nevada Las Vegas, Center for Crime and Justice Policy.
  101. Tilley, N. J. (1997). "Whys and wherefores in evaluating the effectiveness of CCTV." International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention, 2(3): 175-186.
  102. Welsh, B. & Farrington, D. (2002). Crime prevention effects of closed circuit television: A systematic review (Research Study No. 25). London, England: Home Office.
  103. Welsh, B. & Farrington, D. (2009). "Public area CCTV and crime prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis," Justice Quarterly, 26(4): 716-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820802506206
  104. Yavuz, N. & Welch, E. W. (2010). "Addressing fear of crime in public space: Gender differences in reaction to safety measures in train transit." Urban Studies, 47(12): 2491-2515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009359033
  105. Yeom, S. & Woo, Y-H. (2013). "Person-specific face detection in a scene with optimum composite filtering and colour-shape information." International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 10(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5772/52938
  106. Young, J. & Ready, J. (2015). "Diffusion of ideas and technology: The role of networks in influencing the endorsement and use of on-officer video cameras." Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(3): 243-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986214553380