DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

배우자의 가족분만 참여범위에 따른 부부의 가족분만에 대한 태도에 관한 융합연구

A Convergence Study about Married Couples' Attitude toward Family-Birth according to the Spouse's Participation Range of Family-Birth

  • Lee, Sun-Young (Department of Nursing, Songwon University) ;
  • Oh, Sangeun (College of Nursing CRINS, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.30
  • 심사 : 2018.06.20
  • 발행 : 2018.06.28

초록

본 연구는 가족분만에 배우자의 참여정도에 따른 부부의 분만에 대한 태도를 파악하기 위하여 시도하였다. 연구대상은 가족분만전체과정에 참여한 27쌍, 가족분만부분과정에 참여한 27쌍 총 108명이었으며 1차 자료는 가족분만 전에 직접수집하였고, 2차 자료는 가족분만 후에 이메일을 통해 수집하였다. 연구의 결과는 임산부의 직업(Z=-2.012, p=.044), 가족형태(Z=-2.177, p=.029)에 따라 분만태도에 유의한 차이가 있었고 계획된 임신에 따른 임산부의 가족분만 전 가족분만에 대한 태도에 유의한 차이가 있었다(Z=-2.543, p=.011). 배우자의 가족분만 참여범위에 따른 가족분만 전과 후의 가족분만에 대한 태도는 배우자가 가족분만 부분 과정에 참여한 경우 유의한 차이를 나타냈다(Z=2.302, p=.024). 본 연구 결과를 토대로 배우자에게 일방적으로 가족분만에 전 과정에 참여할 것을 제안하기보다 가족분만에 대한 배우자의 의견을 존중하여 참여의 범위를 정하도록 하는 것이 바람직하고, 가족분만 관련 산전교육의 기초자료를 개발하여 가족분만 전에 임산부와 배우자에게 가족분만에 대한 교육을 충분히 제공할 것을 제언한다.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess married couples' attitude toward family-birth according to the range of spouse's participation in family-birth. Method: Data were obtained by the 54 couples who used to visited in order to participate on family-birth at two teritary women's hospital in G-city. Result: There was a significant difference in pregnant woman's attitude : the status of having a job(Z=-2.01, p=.044) & type of nuclear family(Z=-2.17, p=.029), planned pregnance(Z=-2.54, p=.011). The spouse who partly participated in the process of family-birth showed higher(t=2.30, p=.030) compared to the spouse who participated in the whole process of family-birth. Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that hospitals and women's hospitals should support pregnant woman's social work and encourage spouse who partly participation and develop education programs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. H. Kim. (2007). The culture of childbirth among young urban korean women: The perspective of culture change. Korean Society for Cultural Anthropology, 40(2) 253-286.
  2. L. Abushaikha & R. Massah. (2013). Perception of barriers to paternal presence and contribution during childbirth: An exploratory study from Syria. Birth, 40(1), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12030
  3. J. H. Yeo. (2001). Attitudinal type on delivery for college women. Korean Nursing Association. 31(6), 1088-1097.
  4. N. Goutaudier, C. Sejourne, C. Rousset, L. Lami & H. Chabrol. (2012). Neagtive emotions, childbirth perinatal dissociation and self-efficacy as predictors of postpartum posttraumatic stress symptoms, Journal of Reproudective and Infant. Psychology, 30(4), 352-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2012.738415
  5. I. S. Jung. (2017). Effects of husband's help on the mother's postpartum depression and self-efficacy: A pilot study. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 7(6), 45-52.
  6. Eggermont et al. (2017). Needs of fathers during labour and childbirth: A cross-sectional study. Women and Birth, 30(4), 188 - 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.12.001
  7. Karlstrom, A., Nystedt, A & Hildingsson, I. (2015). The meaning of a very positive birth experience: focus groups discussions with women. Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15, 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0683-0
  8. M. R. Park & Y. H. Shin. (2013). Comparison of the leboyer childbirth method with normal vaginal delivery: mothers' perception of childbirth experience, labor pain, newborn's pain response and maternal attachment behaviors. Journal of Korean Society Maternal Child Health, 17(2), 282-291.
  9. M. K. Lee & M. H. Hur. (2011). Effects of the spouse's aromatheray massage on labor pain, anxiety and childbirth satisfaction for laboring women. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 17(3), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2011.17.3.195
  10. M. J. Jang & K. S. Park. (2002). Effect of family participated delivery in a labor delivery room on the childbirth of primiparas. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 8(3), 371-379.
  11. M. J. Jang, Y. Y. Hwang, S. G. Yeoum & K. S. Park. (2003). The effect of family-participated delivery in a labor delivery room on the anxiety of primiparas. Nursing Science Research Institute, Chung-Ang University. 6(2), 67-74.
  12. G. J. Kim. (2013). The effects of doula touch delivery education on self-confidence delivery, knowledge of childbirth, couple satisfaction. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 14(6), 2880-2886. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.6.2880
  13. H. S. Shim & G. H. Shin. (2018). The effects of father's family-of- origin experience on parenting attitude and parenting participation: focusing on meditating effects of value of children. Journal of Digital Convergence. 16(1). 399-408. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.1.399
  14. K. H. Park, S. H. Lee, B. K. Jin & J. S. Won, (2011). The effects of labor support behaviors (LSB) one-to-one application and partner's delivery participation on the delivery satisfaction and delivery results among mothers who delivered premature birth and low birth weight infant. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 17(2), 239-250.
  15. J. W. Yang & I. S. Jung. (2018). Convergence effect of spouse's support on postpartum depression and self-efficacy in primipara, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(1), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.1.171
  16. M. S, Choi & G. J. Kim. (2011). Effects of paters' duola touch during labor on the paternal attachment and role confidence to neonate and couple attachment, Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 17(4), 426-437. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2011.17.4.426
  17. M. K. Park, Y. S. Ko & E. S. Kim. (2017). Study on the Perceptions of Delivery Experience, Paternal Attachment and Role Confidence to Neonate of Spous. Asia-pacific Journal of Multinedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 7(10), 755-765.
  18. E. Ford & S. Ayers. (2011). Support during birth interacts with prior trauma and birth intervention to predict postnatal post-traumatic stress symptoms. Psychology and Health. 26(12) 1553-1570. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2010.533770
  19. H. Ley. (2011). Fear of childbirth: Understanding the causes, impact and treatment. British Journal of Midwifery, 19(4), 215-220. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2011.19.4.215
  20. M. H. Jeon & E. K. Oo, (2004). A study on primiparous husband's state anxiety, perceived support and the perception of childbirth experience. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 10(1), 51-58.
  21. Otley H. (2011). Fear of childbirth: Understanding the causes, impact and treatment. British Journal of Midwifery, 19(4), 215-220. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2011.19.4.215
  22. Y. Parfitt & S. Ayers. (2009). The effect of post-natal symptoms of post-traumatic stress and depression on the couple's relationship and parent-baby bond. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 27(2), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830802350831
  23. K. Nichollas & S. Ayers. (2007). Childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder in couples: A qualitative study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 12(4), 491-509. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910706X120627
  24. K. H. Park, J. S. Choi, J. H. Lee & B. K. Jin. (2008). Effects of doula support in LDR (Labor-Delivery-Recovery) on anxiety, labor pain, and perceived childbirth experience of primiparas. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research, 14, (3), 87-97.
  25. M. J. Park, H. J. Oh, J. H. Yun, E. S. Kim & Y. H. Yi. (2012). Attitudes of wives and husbands to the husband's presence during labor and delivery. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research, 18(1), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.22650/JKCNR.2012.18.1.74
  26. M. Nejad. (2005). Couples' attitudes to the husband's presence in the delivery room during childbirth. Estern Mediterranean Health Journal, 11( 4), 828-834.
  27. Y. Bakhta & R. Lee. (2010). A survey of Russian women regarding the presence of a companion during labor. International Journal of Gynecology and Obsterics, 10(9), 201-211.
  28. H. Longworth. (2006). Should fathers be in the labour room? Yes, for support not intervention. British Journal of Midwifery. 14(5), 288-234. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2006.14.5.21053