참고문헌
- Sontakke SD, Umapathy G, Sivaram V, Kholkute SD, Shivaji S. Semen characteristics, cryopreservation, and successful artificial insemination in the Blue rock pigeon (Columba livia). Theriogenology 2004;62:139-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.08.018
- Alkan S, Baran A, Ozadas OB, Evecev M. Morphological defects in turkey semen. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2002;26:1087-92.
- Sexton T. Breeding by artificial insemination. Br Poult Sci Ltd 1984:175-81.
- Cheng FP, Guo TJ, Wu JT, et al. Annual variation in semen characteristics of pigeons (Columba livia). Poult Sci 2002;81:1050-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.7.1050
- Suh S, Sharma A, Lee S, et al. Genetic diversity and relationships of Korean chicken breeds based on 30 microsatellite markers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:1399-405. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14016
- Malik A, Haron AW, Yusoff R, Nesa M, Bukar M, Kasim A. Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken, and bantam chicken in Malaysia. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2013;37:564-8. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1107-26
- Saacke R. Semen quality in relation to semen preservation. J Dairy Sci 1983;66:2635-44. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)82137-7
- Stromberg J, Stromberg L. Guide to better hatching. Fort Dodge, IA, USA: Stromberg Pub. Co.; 1975.
- Sexton T. Effect of semen treatments and age of tom on fertility of unstored semen and semen held 18 hours. Poult Sci 1987;66:1721-6. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0661721
- Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Shanmugam M, et al. Characterization of two Indian native chicken breeds for production, egg and semen quality, and welfare traits. Poult Sci 2011;90:314-20. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01013
- Shanmugam M, Rajkumar U, Reddy M, Rao SR. Effect of age on semen quality in naked neck and dwarf chicken under tropical climatic conditions. Anim Prod Sci 2012;52:964-8. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12033
- Scherf BD. World watch list for domestic animal diversity. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO); 2000.
- Burrows W, Quinn J. The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poult Sci 1937;16:19-24. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0160019
- Khan M, Ijaz A. Effects of osmotic pressure on motility, plasma membrane integrity and viability in fresh and frozen-thawed buffalo spermatozoa. Animal 2008;2:548-53.
- Bjorndahl L, Soderlund I, Kvist U. Evaluation of the one-step eosin-nigrosin staining technique for human sperm vitality assessment. Hum Reprod 2003;18:813-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg199
- Love C. Relationship between sperm motility, morphology and the fertility of stallions. Theriogenology 2011;76:547-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.03.007
- Pereira RJ, Napolitano A, Garcia-Pereira FL, et al. Conservation of avian germplasm by xenogeneic transplantation of spermatogonia from sexually mature donors. Stem cells Dev 2012;22:735-49.
- Holt W. Basic aspects of frozen storage of semen. Anim Reprod SCci 2000;62:3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00152-4
- Wishart G. Quantitation of the fertilising ability of fresh compared with frozen and thawed fowl spermatozoa. Br Poult Sci 1985;26:375-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668508416825
- Holsberger DR, Donoghue A, Froman D, Ottinger M. Assessment of ejaculate quality and sperm characteristics in turkeys: sperm mobility phenotype is independent of time. Poult Sci 1998;77:1711-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.11.1711
- Nguyen TMD, Seigneurin F, Froment P, Combarnous Y, Blesbois E. The 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is involved in the augmentation of antioxidant defenses in cryopreserved chicken sperm. PloS one 2015;10:e0134420. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134420
- Omeje S, Marire B. Evaluation of the semen characteristics of adult cocks of different genetic backgrounds. Theriogenology 1990;34:1111-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(05)80010-X
- Lukaszewicz E, Jerysz A, Partyka A, Siudzinska A. Efficacy of evaluation of rooster sperm morphology using different staining methods. Res Vet Sci 2008;85;583-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2008.03.010
- Ntemka A, Tsousis G, Brozos C, et al. Breed differences of bull frozen-thawed semen. Reprod Domest Anim 2016;51:945-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12769
- Kuster C, Singer R, Althouse G. Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm. Theriogenology 2004;61:691-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00240-1
- Hu J, Chen J, Wen J, et al. Estimation of the genetic parameters of semen quality in Beijing-You chickens. Poult Sci 2013;92:2606-12. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03328
- Love CC, Varner DD, Thompson JA. Intra-and inter-stallion variation in sperm morphology and their relationship with fertility. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1999:93-100.
- Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, et al. Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril 2002;77:873-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03105-9
- Sapp R, Rekaya R, Misztal I, Wing T. Male and female fertility and hatchability in chickens: A longitudinal mixed model approach. Poult Sci 2004;83:1253-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.8.1253
- Brillard J-P. Factors affecting oviductal sperm storage in domestic fowl following artificial insemination. Anim Reprod Sci 1992;27:247-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(92)90062-I
피인용 문헌
- Oral administration of royal jelly may improve the preservation of rooster spermatozoa vol.104, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13415