DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Emergency Arbitrator Provisions in Korea: A Focus on Urgency Inherent and Enforcement

한국 긴급중재인 제도의 긴급성과 집행력에 관하여

  • 도혜정 (대한상사중재원 중재사업본부 조정팀)
  • Received : 2018.05.10
  • Accepted : 2018.05.31
  • Published : 2018.06.01

Abstract

Two years ago, an emergency arbitrator procedure in accordance with the international arbitration rule has been finally adopted in Korea?a decade after its introduction. Arbitral institutions provide interim measures in the course of tribunal proceedings to avoid litigation in open court that is often expensive and time-consuming. An emergency arbitrator procedure offers an urgent relief prior to the constitution of an arbitral tribunal, thus enhancing the speed and effectiveness of the arbitration procedure even further. Although most of the arbitral institutions interpret that the emergency arbitration rulings are binding on the parties, enforcing the emergency arbitration provisions have some difficulties in practice, and it is not clear whether or not arbitral interim measures will be enforceable under the newly adopted provisions in Korea. In this study, experiences in other countries are explored in seeking for the possible problems and solutions of enforcing the emergency arbitration rulings. For example, Singapore and Hong Kong insert terms such as "finality," "enforceable in the same manner as an order or direction of the Court," "same effect as an arbitral tribunal or interim measures" in their emergency arbitrator legislation to enhance enforcement. Moreover, "urgency inherent" are considered.

Keywords

References

  1. 김광수, "우리나라 무역분쟁의 해결을 위한 UNCITRAL 중재규칙 활용방안에 관한 연구", 貿易學會誌, 제39권 제4호, 한국무역학회, 2014.
  2. 김도훈, "긴급중재인제도에 관한 소고 -국제중재기관들의 긴급중재인제도에 관한 비교검토를 중심으로-", 제62호, 선진상사법률연구, 법무부 상사법무과, 2013, 제62호
  3. 김상찬, 김유정, "싱가포르 국제중재제도에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 제24권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2014.
  4. 김태훈, "대한상사중재원 국제중재규칙 개정 시행을 맞이하여", 계간중재, 제345호, 대한상사중재원, 2016.
  5. 석광현, "2016년 중재법의 주요 개정내용과 문제점", 법학연구, 제53집, 전북대학교 법학연구소, 2017.
  6. 석광현, "중재법의 개정방향 -국제상사중재의 측면을 중심으로-", 서울대학교 법학, 제53권 제3호, 서울대학교 법학연구소, 2012.
  7. 안건형, 이동수, 오원석, "미국중재협회/국제분쟁해결센터(AAA/ICDR)의 긴급중재인 제도에 관한 연구", 국제상학, 제26권 제2호, 한국국제상학회, 2011.
  8. 안건형, 김성룡, "스톡홀름 상업회의소(SCC) 중재기관의 긴급중재인 제도와 임시적 처분의 인정요건에 관한 연구", 중재연구(한국중재학회, 2011), 제21권 제2호, 65-83면.
  9. 윤남근, "개정 국내중재규칙의 주요내용과 취지", 계간중재, 제346호, 대한상사중재원, 2016.
  10. 이기수, 신창섭, 국제거래법 제6판, 세창출판사, 2015.
  11. 신희택, "국제중재발전을 위한 제언", 계간중재, 제341호, 대한상사중재원, 2014.
  12. 정교화, "긴급중재인(Emergency Arbitrator) 제도에 대한 고찰", 법학평론, 제5권, 서울대학교 법학평론 편집위원회, 2015.
  13. 주이화, 배상필, 심상렬, "중재판정부의 임시적 처분과 국제중재기관들의 긴급중재인 제도 비교 연구", 중재연구, 제22권 제3호, 한국중재학회, 2012.
  14. Barrington, L., "Emergency arbitrators: can they be useful to the construction industry", CONSTRUCTION LAW INTERNATIONAL, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2012.
  15. Bose, R. and Meredith, I., "Emergency Arbitration Procedures: A Comparative Analysis", International Arbitration Law Review, 5, 2012.
  16. Born, G. B., "International Commercial Arbitration", (Wolters Kluwer 2014), Second Edition.
  17. Lemenez, G. and Quigley, P., "The ICDR's Emergency Arbitrator Procedure in Action", Dispute Resolution Journal, November 2008/January 2009, 2008.
  18. Lundstedt1 Johan, "SCC Practice: Emergency Arbitrator Decisions 1 January 2010 - 31 December 2013", Retrieved May, 29, 2018, from http://www.sccinstitute.com/media/29995/scc-practice-2010-2013-emergency-arbitrator_final.pdf
  19. Lye, K. C. and Leong, S., "Emergency Arbitrators in Singapore", Emergency Arbitrators in Singapore, 3, Norton Rose Fulbright, 2014.
  20. Savola, M., "Interim Measures and Emergency Arbitrator Proceedings", Presentation at the 23rd Croatian Arbitration Days: Access to Arbitral Justice Part IV: Time Aspects of Access to Arbitral Justice, Zagreb, Croatia, December 3-4, Permanent arbitration court, 2015.
  21. Vasani, S. Z., "The Emergency Arbitrator: Doubling as an Effective Option for Urgent Relief and an Early Settlement Tool", The King & Spalding Energy Newsletter, 8 May (2015). Retrieved Nov. 22, 2017, from https://s3.amazonaws.com/documents.lexology.com/9811ecfc-4e77-4e81-bc06-38ed08cb0e45.pdf
  22. Villani, A. and Caccialanza, M., "Interim Relief through Emergency Arbitration: An Upcoming Goal or Still an Illusion?" (2017) Retrieved Sep. 23, 2017, from http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2017/07/14/interim-relief-emergency-arbitration-upcoming-goal-still-illusion/