DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

세계유산 황산의 보호관리 특성 및 보전방안

A Protection Management Characteristic and Preservation Plan of World Heritage Mt. Huangshan

  • 신현실 (북경대학세계유산연구중심)
  • 투고 : 2018.02.07
  • 심사 : 2018.03.16
  • 발행 : 2018.03.31

초록

본 연구는 국내 자연 및 복합유산의 지속적인 보호관리 정책 마련을 위한 기초자료 구축에 목적이 있으며, 세계복합유산으로 등재된 황산을 대상으로 세계유산협약에 따른 보호관리 현황 및 그 특성을 살펴보고 지속적 보전 가운데 활용 방안을 모색해 보고자 하였다. 이에 황산 관련 보호관리 법령 및 제도, 경계 설정, 정책의 변화와 특성을 살펴본 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 황산은 1933년 황산 건설 위원회 성립을 시작으로 보호관리가 시작되었으며, 1982년 국가급 풍경명승구 지정 이후 중앙부처에서의 법률 제정, 지방정부의 조례를 통해 보호관리의 근거가 마련되면서 보호관리 및 활용과 관련한 다양한 사업들이 시행되었다. 둘째, 보호를 위한 경계의 설정은 행정구역 계획을 통해 황산의 경계를 재정비 하는 등 중앙정부의 적극적 개입이 이루어졌으며, 황산 일대 생태적, 경관적 가치뿐만 아니라 문화적 요소의 보호를 위해 풍경명승구 및 세계유산 지정구역 선정 등 보호구역을 설정하였다. 셋째, 황산의 보호관리 양상은 크게 네 가지 시기로 구분되었다. 제1기는 황산의 보호관리를 위한 행정조치가 시작된 시기로 구분하였으며, 제2기는 황산이 국가급 풍경명승구로 지정되면서 법령 및 관리계획이 시행되었다. 3기는 세계유산 등재 이후 국제기구의 권고사항에 따른 보호 중심의 사업이 이루어진 시기였으며, 제4기는 황산시의 지속적 보호 가운데 활용을 위한 관광산업 확대 이후 오늘날까지 유산을 중심으로 한 지역 활성화 정책과 지정구역 내 보전사업이 시행되고 있었다. 넷째, 황산의 보호관리 주체는 중앙정부와 성시정부로 이원화되어 있으며, 복합유산인 황산은 문화유산 관리부처와 자연유산 관리부처가 공동으로 관리하고 있다. 황산의 보호관리는 행정단위별 관리체계 구축을 통해 유산 관련 업무의 효율성과 전문성을 도모하였으며, 현단위 이상 지방정부가 지역 특성에 맞는 보호관리 정책을 시행하도록 권한을 위임받았다. 다섯째, 오늘날 황산은 산정을 중심으로 하는 개발정책으로 보호구역이 파괴되었다. 또한 난립하는 숙박시설 운영에 따라 오수와 쓰레기 방류, 관광객에 의한 환경오염이 문제점으로 제기되고 있으며, 주변지역에 식재된 인공림에서 발생하는 병충해 피해와 케이블카 조성에 따른 생태계의 변화가 나타났다. 여섯째, 황산의 지속적 보호를 위해서는 숙박시설에 대한 신축 증축, 관리에 대한 엄격한 규제가 요구되며, 관람객 수용인원 제한 및 통제를 위한 시설물의 설치가 필요하다.

The purpose of this study is to establish basic data for the continuous protection management policy of domestic natural world heritage and mixed world heritage, and to examine the present situation and characteristics of the protection management according to the World Heritage Convention on the World Heritage listed Huangshan. The results of this study are as follows. First, Huangshan began to be protected by the establishment of the Huangshan Construction Committee in 1933, and after the designation of national park in 1982, laws and regulations were established in the central ministries, And various projects related to utilization have been implemented. Secondly, the establishment of the boundary for protection was actively intervened by the central government, such as the reorganization of the boundary of Huangshan through the administrative district plan. In order to protect the ecological and landscape value as well as the cultural factor, And designated a heritage designated area. Third, the protection management of Huangshan was divided into four major stages. The first phase was divided into the period when administrative measures were taken to manage the protection of Huangshan. The second phase was designated as a national park in Huangshan. The third period was the time of the protection-oriented project according to the recommendation of the international organizations after the World Heritage listed. The fourth period was the expansion of the tourism industry for the continuous use of protection of Huangshan city, My preservation business was being implemented. Fourth, Huangshan is managed by the central government and the city government. Huangshan, which is a mixed heritage, is managed jointly by the Ministry of Cultural Heritage Administration and the Ministry of Natural Heritage Administration. The protection and management of Huangshan promoted the efficiency and expertise of the heritage-related work through the establishment of the administrative unit-specific management system, and the local governments were entrusted with the authority to implement the protection management policies that meet local characteristics. Fifth, the preservation area of Huangshan has been destroyed by the development policy centered on the mountain. In addition, according to the operation of accommodation facilities, there are problems such as sewage, garbage disposal, and environmental pollution caused by tourists, and the damage caused by pests and diseases in planted plantations around the area and changes in ecosystem due to the composition of cable cars. Sixth, for the continuous protection of Huangshan, strict regulations on new construction, extension and management of accommodation are required, and it is necessary to install facilities to limit and control the number of visitors.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. World Heritage Centre(1972). The World Heritage Convention. World Heritage Centre.
  2. Choi, W. S.(2012). Value and Composition of Mt. Jiri's Cultural Landscape as a World Heritage. Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers. 18(1): 42-54.
  3. Choi, J. H. and Rii, H. U.(2013). Analysis of Landscape Layers in the Namhansanseong form the Viewpoint of Outstanding Universal Value as a World Heritage. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society. 16(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2013.16.1.1
  4. Cheon, D. Y. and Kim, J. O.(2010). The worth of World Heritage Site"Mireuksa" from the architectural aspect. MAHAN BAEKJE MUNHWA. 19(-): 33-68.
  5. Lee, N. S.(2009). The Values of Baekje's Cultural Relics as Heritage in Gongju. Culture of Baekje. 40(-): 185-202.
  6. Sung, H. H., Kim, J. S. and Seo, J. W.(2016). A Study on the Application of Criterion(vii) of World Heritage and Identifying Values in Criterion(vii) for Mt. Seoraksan in the Tentative List. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society. 51(1): 1-21.
  7. Seo, J. H.(2013). A Study on the Strategies and Challenges Facing the Registration of Mt. Jiri on the World Heritage List. The Journal of Cultural Policy. 27(1): 147-163. https://doi.org/10.16937/jcp.27.1.201301.147
  8. Jeon, J. H.(2013). A Study on the Evaluation and Categorization of National Heritage 'Myeongseung' in Korea from the Viewpoint of World Heritage Concept and its Criteria. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society. 48(6): 929-943.
  9. Jung, J. Y. and Rii, H. U.(2016). Analysis of the General Indicator of Monitoring for Management of World Heritage Sites. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society. 19(2): 137-147. https://doi.org/10.21189/JKUGS.19.2.10
  10. Seo, H.(2013). A study on the establishment of evaluation system and improvement plan for effective management of world cultural heritage : focused on Gyeongju historic areas. Ph. D. Dissertation Dongguk University.
  11. Han, P. W.(2017). The Practices and Issues in the Protection and Management, and the Promotion and Use of World Heritages in Korea. MAHAN BAEKJE MUNHWA. 30(-): 65-78.
  12. Mun, E. H.(2017). Strategies for Local Revitalization of World Heritage Baekje Historic Areas. MAHAN BAEKJE MUNHWA. 30(-): 5-34.
  13. Choi, J. H. and Rii, H. U.(2012). Promotion Activities of Fortress Heritages Inscribed as World Heritage. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society. 15(3): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2012.15.1.1
  14. Kim, Y. S. and Song, I. H.(2012). Classification according to Characteristics and Tendency of OUV(Outstanding Universal Value) Evaluation Criteria of World Heritage of Walls in East Asia. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 30(4): 81-92.
  15. Jung, J. Y. and Rii, H. U.(2014). Townscape and World Heritage of Macao. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society. 17(2): 49-58.
  16. Lim, K. U.(2008). The Volcanic Landscape for the World Heritage as the Tourism Resource. Journal of the Association of Korean Photo-Geographers. 18(2): 75-94.
  17. Lim, K. U.(2009). The Characteristic of the Natural Tourism Landscapes for World Heritage in Karst. Journal of the Association of Korean Photo-Geographers. 19(1): 59-71.
  18. Lee, W. H.(2017). Influence of tourism utilization trend before and after world heritage list on heritage preservation and management. 2017 ICO-Form Workshop Journal. pp. 9-37.
  19. 黄山风景区管委会主办版权所有 http://www.chinahuangshan.gov.cn/
  20. Ministry of Cultural Travel Department in China http://www.cnta.gov.cn/xxfb/xxfb_dfxw/ah/201801/t20180111_ 853104.shtml
  21. 中国安徽在线网站(中安在线) 2013.8.20. Newspapers http://travel.anhuinews.com/system/2013/08/20/006005672.shtml