DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

몸체 형상이 수중운동체의 공동 발달과 항력특성에 미치는 영향에 대한 수치적 연구

A Numerical Study of Effects of Body Shape on Cavity and Drag of Underwater Vehicle

  • Kim, Hyoung-Tae (Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kang, Kyung-Tae (Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Jung-Kyu (Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Jung, Young-Rae (Agency for Defense Development) ;
  • Kim, Min-Jae (Agency for Defense Development)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.23
  • 심사 : 2018.04.12
  • 발행 : 2018.06.20

초록

The calculation of steady-state cavitating flows around Supercavitating Underwater Bodies (SUB's), which consist of a circular disk head (cavitator), a conical fore-body, a cylindrical middle-body and either a boat-tail or a flare-tail, are carried out. To calculate the axisymmetric cavitating flow, used is a commercial computational fluid dynamics code based on the finite volume method, Fluent. From the analysis of numerical results, the cavity and drag, affected by the fore-body and tail of the SUB's, are investigated. Firstly, the effect of the fore-body shape is investigated with the same disk cavitator and a cylindrical rear-body of fixed diameter. Then with the same cavitator and a fixed fore-body, the effect of the rear-body shape is investigated. Before the cavity generated by the cavitator covers the slant of fore-bodies sufficiently, the larger the cone angle of the fore-body(i.e., the shorter the slant length), the larger the drag and the slower the development of cavity. After the cavity covers the fore-body completely so that the pressure drag component of the body is vanished, the characteristics of drag-velocity curves are identical. Also, as the tail angle is bigger, the cavity generated by the cavitator is suppressed further and the drag becomes larger. The peak of the drag appears for the flare-tail, i.e., when the tail angle is positive(+). On the contrary, the trough of the drag appears for the boat-tail, i.e., when the tail angle is negative(-). When the tail angle is 5 degrees, the peak of the drag appears at the body speed of 80m/s and the value of the drag is 43% larger than that at the design speed of 100m/s. When the tail angle is -5 degrees, the trough of the total drag appears at 75m/s and that drag is 30% smaller than that of the cavitator, which means the rest of the body has a negative drag.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, B.K., Lee, T.K., Kim, H.T. & Lee, C.S., 2012. Experimental investigation of supercavitating flows. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 4(2), pp.123-131. https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0083
  2. Ahn, S.S., 2007. An integrated aproach to the design of supercavitating underwater vehicles. Ph.D. Thesis. Atlanta, School of Aerospace, Georgia Institute of Technology.
  3. Alyanak, E., Venkayya, V., Grandhi, R. & Penmetsa, R., 2004. Variable shape cavitator design for a super-cavitating torpedo. Proceedings of 10th AIAA/ISSNMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, NY, USA, 30 August-1 September 2004.
  4. ANSYS 13.0, 2010. User's guide, 2010. SAS IP Inc: USA.
  5. Balas, G.J., Bokor J., Vanek, B. & Arndt, R.E.A., 2006. Control of high-speed underwater vehicles. Control of Uncertain Systems, LNCIS 329, pp. 25-44.
  6. Choi, J.K. & Kim, H.T., 2010. A study of using wall functon for numerical analysis of high reynolds number turbulence flow. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 47(5), pp. 647-655. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2010.47.5.647
  7. Foot, J.P., Lineberry, J.T., Thompson, B.R. & Winkelman, B.C., 1996. Investigation of aluminium particle combustion for underwater propulsion applications. AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 32nd, Lake Buena Vista, FL, 1-3 July 1996.
  8. Guzevsky L.G., 1983. Approximation dependencies for axisymmetric cavities past cones, Hydrodynamic flows and wave processes. [in Russian], Institute of Thermal Physics, Sib. Branch, Acad. of Sci. of the USSR, Novosibirsk, pp.82-91.
  9. Kim, H.T., Lee, H.B. & Choi, J.K., 2015. Numerical analysis of the drag of conical cavitators. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 52(4), pp. 305-314. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2015.52.4.305
  10. Kim, H.T., Kim, B.J., Choi, J.K. & Yoon, H.G., 2016. An estimation of the size of supercavities for conical cavitators. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 53(2), pp. 92-100. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2016.53.2.92
  11. Kim, Y.G. & Nah, Y.I., 2011. Propulsion technologies of supercavitating rocket torpedo. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers, Fall Conference, Busan, Republic of Korea, 24-25 November 2011, pp.383-387.
  12. Lee, H.B., Kim, H.T. & Choi, J.K., 2013. Numerical analysis of supercavitating flows of two-dimensional simple bodies. Journal of the Society of Naval Architecture of Korea, 50(6), pp. 436-449. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2013.50.6.436
  13. Miller, T.F. & Herr, J.D., 2004. Green rocket propulsion by reaction of Al and Mg powder and water. Proceedings of 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 11-14 July 2004.
  14. Park, J., Kim, S.H. & Kim, N., 2016. Studies on planing avoidance control for a ventilated supercavitating vehicle. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 53(3), pp. 201-209. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2016.53.3.201
  15. Ruggaber, W. & Hinding, W., 2006. Barracuda-Guidance & Control of a super cavitating high speed underwater missile. UDT Europe 2006.
  16. Semenenko, V.N., 2001. Artificial supercavitation, physics and calculation. Lecture Notes for RTO AVT/VKI Special Course on Supercavitating Flows. Belgium, Rhode Saint Genese: Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
  17. Self, M.W. & Ripken, H.F., 1955. Steady-State cavity studies in a free-jet water tunnel. Minnesota: St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Report No. 47.