DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Examination and Suggestions on Introducing and Administering Confidential Information Review on Material Safety Data Sheets

국내 물질안전보건자료 영업비밀 심사제도의 도입·운영에 대한 검토 및 제안

  • Lee, Kwon Seob (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency) ;
  • Jo, Ji hoon (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency)
  • 이권섭 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 조지훈 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원)
  • Received : 2018.02.13
  • Accepted : 2018.03.15
  • Published : 2018.03.30

Abstract

Objectives: From a policy perspective, the introduction of confidential information reviews is a vital task for expanding workers' right to know and improving hazardous materials information communication. In this study, rational methods for introducing and administering confidential information reviews were examined as a part of advancing chemical information communication. Methods: The domestic status, social demands, and control cases from other countries about confidential information in material safety data sheets(MSDSs) were all examined. Additionally, principles for introducing MSDS confidential information review, what needs to be revised prior to its introduction, and procedures and manners of reviewing confidential information were suggested. Results and Conclusions: When composition information on MSDS needs to be protected in the EU and Canada, confidential information should be claimed and then approved by competent authorities with a principle of reviewing confidential information prior to rescinding information from MSDS. Applying the same principle, certain information on an MSDS that needs to be protected should be reviewed and approved in Korea. As a result, the MSDS is communicated with approval numbers replacing composition information. MSDS confidential information review has five steps, including deciding whether chemicals claimed to be confidential are excluded from applying for a confidentiality exemption, the names and concentration ranges of ingredients are adequate, and the claimed information is valid in terms of confidentiality.

Keywords

References

  1. ACS(American Chemical Society). CHEMLIST(Regulated chemicals). 2017.11. Avalilable from: URL:http://www.cas.org/index.html
  2. EU EC(European Union European Commission). Commission regulation(EC) No. 1272/2008 of the european parliament and of the council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures(CLP). 2009
  3. GoC(Government of Canada). Technical guidance on the requirements of the hazardous products Act(HPA) and the hazardous products regulation(HPR) - WHMIS 2015 supplier requirements. 2015
  4. Hong MK, Song SW, Lee KS, Choi SB, Lee JH. A Study of MSDS reliability evaluation in chemicals including formaldehyde. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2013: 23(3): 287-298
  5. Lee JH, Lee KS, Park JW, Han KN. A study on the actual conditions of trade secrets in the MSDS and the improvement. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2011: 21(3):128-138
  6. Lee KS, Choi JH, Jo JH, Choi SB, Lee JH et al. MSDSs reliability evaluation in workplaces manufacturing aromatic hydrocarbon. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2009;19(4):370-380
  7. Lee KS, Han IS, Han JH, Park DU, Lee DW et al. A study on the chemical composition and MSDS reliability of powder coatings. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2004;14(3):221-232
  8. Lee KS, Jo JH, Choi JH, Choi SB, Lee JH. A study on the ways of improving the reliability of MSDS written and controlled in workplaces. KOSHA. 2007. p. 53-59
  9. Lee KS, Jo JH, Park JW, Song SW. Analysis on the legal control levels and GHS classification information status for strongly acidic hazardous materials. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2013;23(4):384-392
  10. Lee KS, Lee HJ, Hong MK. A study on the application status to trade secret of GHS MSDSs distributed in the workplaces and its improvement measures. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2016;26(3):293-300 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2016.26.3.293
  11. Lee KS, Seung SW, Hwang SS, Yoon SJ, Yang HS et al. A study on the chemical substance information control and its improvement. KOSHA. 2005
  12. Kim SB, Lee YK, Choi YE. How to improve the reliability of MSDS and labels?: A critical review on the U.S. standard 29 CFR part 1910 Hazard Communication. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2015a;25(1):1-12 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2015.25.1.1
  13. Kim SB, Lee YK, Choi YE. How to improve the reliability of MSDS and labels?(2): A review on the EU CLP (REGULATION(EC) No 1272/2008). Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2015b;25(2):115-125 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2015.25.2.115
  14. Kim SB, Lee YK, Choi YE. Issue analysis on 'Trade secret claim' in Chemicals control act」 and 「amendment on occupational safety and health act(1917-227). Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2015c;25(4):433-445 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2015.25.4.433
  15. Kim YJ, Yoo IT, Jin SJ, Yoo EH, Kim HM et al.. Amendment for occupational safety and health act(No. 17227). 2016
  16. KIPO(Korean Intellectual Property Office). Unfair competition prevention and trade secret protection act. 2014
  17. Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Enforcement rule of the occupational safety and health act. 2017a
  18. Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Occupational safety and health act. 2017b
  19. Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Standard for classification, labeling of chemical substance and material safety data sheet(MoEL Public Notice No. 2016-19). 2017c
  20. Ministry Of Environment(MoE). Chemicals control act. 2017a
  21. Ministry Of Environment(MoE). Enforcement rule of the act on registration, evaluation, etc. of chemicals. 2017b
  22. NPAC(National Planning and Advisory Committee). Contents of the 100 major government projects of the five-year plan of state administration-Implementation of MSDS trade secret examination system. 2017
  23. Park JH, Ham SH, Kim SJ, Lee KS, Ha KC. Study on the chemical management - 1. chemical characteristics and occupational exposure limits under occupational safety and health act of Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2015;25(1):45-57 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2015.25.1.45
  24. UN(United National). Globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemical(GHS). St/Sg/Ac. 10/30/Rev.6, 2017.
  25. UNEP(United Nations Environmental Programme). Strategic approach to international chemicals management (SAICM) - Report of the international conference on chemical management on the work of its fist session. SAICM/ICCM.1/7. 2006
  26. US DoL(United States Department of Labor. 29 CFR Part 1910 Hazard communication: Final rule. Fed regist. 1983;48(208):53280
  27. US EPA(United States Environmental Protection Agency). Emergency planning and community right-to-know act(EPCRA). 1986