Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science

  • 제20권2호
  • /
  • Pages.92-102
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2383-6415(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-6423(eISSN)
한국기초간호학회 (Korean society of Biological Nursing Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 기초간호학 교육에 대한 학습법 관련 연구 분석

The Analysis of Studies Related to the Learning Methods of Biological Nursing Subjects in Korea

  • 박종민 (경북보건대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 백경화 (경북보건대학교 간호학과)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.15
  • 심사 : 2018.05.14
  • 발행 : 2018.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the current status of studies related to the learning methods of biological nursing subjects in Korea. Methods: Five databases (KoreaMed, KMbase, NDSL, KISS, KiSTi) and grey literature were searched prior to February 2018. A total 12 studies met the inclusion criteria including 11 articles and 1 proceeding. Results: We included five experimental studies, five non-experimental studies, and two mixed method studies. First, most of the studies that applied a learning method focused on the subject of human anatomy and physiology; team-based learning was the method that was utilized the most. Second, the necessity of well-designed research was confirmed because the quality of included studies was low. Third, the research variables identified were mainly concentrated on the affective domain, and included satisfaction, motivation, self-efficacy, self-directed learning, confidence, attitude. We confirmed the need to develop a learning program that can also improve the cognitive and psychomotor domain variables in future research. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that further research should be conducted with consideration the domain of research variables evenly. In addition, future studies should apply various learning methods and included randomized controlled trials.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choe MA. Perspectives on bionursing science. Perspectives in Nursing Science. 2012;9(2):61-70
  2. Seo WS. An analysis of requisite knowledge body of physiology for nursing education. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 1995;2(2):229-237.
  3. Choi MA, Shin GS. A study on the current status of the curriculum operation of the basic medical sciences in nursing education. The Journal of Nurses Academic Society. 1997;27(4):975-987. http://doi.org/10.4040/jnas.1997.27.4.975
  4. Choe MA, Byun YS, Seo YS, Hwang AR, Kim HS, Hong HS, et al. A study on the degree of need of human structure and function knowledge in clinical nurses. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science. 1999;1(1):1-24.
  5. Choe MA, Byun YS, Seo YS, Hwang AR, Kim HS, Hong HS, et al. A study on the degree of need of the knowledge of pathophysiology, clinical microbiology and mechanisms and effects of drugs in clinical nurses. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science. 2000;2(1):1-19.
  6. Lee KS, Jeong JS, Choe MA, Kim JH, An GJ, Kim JH, et al. Development of standard syllabuses for 4 subjects (structure and function of human body, pathogenic microbiology, pathophysiology, mechanisms and effects of drug) of bionursing. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science. 2013;15(1):33-42. http://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2013.15.1.33
  7. Park H, Kim YK, Kim JH, Jeong JS, Choi-Kwon S, Hong HS. Development of syllabuses for biological nursing science subjects based on learning outcomes:Structure and function of human body, pathogenic microbiology, pathophysiology, and mechanisms and effects of drugs. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science. 2015;17(2):188-210. http://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2015.17.2.188
  8. Oermann MH, Gaberson KB. Evaluation and testing in nursing education. 5th ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2016. p. 3-22.
  9. Yoo JS, Ahn JA, Yeo KS, Chu SH. The study to reorganize the course of basic nursing science in a college of nursing. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science. 2008;10(2):162-169.
  10. Clarke M. Nursing and the biological sciences. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1995;22(3):405-406. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22030405.x
  11. Chapple M, Allcock N, Wharrad HJ. Bachelor of nursing students' experiences of learning biological sciences alongside medical students. Nurse Education Today. 1993;13(6):426-434. http://doi.org/10.1016/0260-6917(93)90118-l
  12. Clancy J, McVicar A, Bird D. Getting it right? An exploration of issues relating to the biological sciences in nurse education and nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2000;32(6):1522-1532. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01608.x
  13. McVicar A, Andrew S, Kemble R. Biosciences within the pre-registration (prerequisite) curriculum: An integrative literature review of curriculum interventions 1990-2012. Nurse Education Today. 2014;34(4):560-568. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.08.012
  14. Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, Macaulay AC, Salsberg J, Jagosh J, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2012;49(1):47-53. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002
  15. Massey D, Chaboyer W, Anderson V. What factors influence ward nurses' recognition of and response to patient deterioration? An integrative review of the literature. Nursing open. 2017;4(1):6-23. http://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.53
  16. Delgado C, Upton D, Ranse K, Furness T, Foster K. Nurses' resilience and the emotional labour of nursing work: An integrative review of empirical literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2017;70:71-88. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.008
  17. Pluye P, Robert E, Cargo M, Bartlett G, O'cathain A, Griffiths F, et al. Proposal:A mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews [Internet]. Montreal: McGill University; 2011 [cited 2018 Apr 15]. Available from: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com./w/file/fetch/84371689/MMAT%202011%20criteria%20and%20tutorial%202011-06-29updated2014.08.21.pdf.
  18. Bloom BS, Committee of College and University Examiners.Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longmans, Green; 1956.
  19. Chung SE, Lee SH. Nursing student’s experience of education using simulation. Journal of Qualitative Research. 2010;11(1):50-59.
  20. Kim MJ, Park SY, Park SJ, Park JY, Lee YH, Choi EA. Comparative study of nursing students consciousness of biomedical ethics and attitudes toward human tissue donation and transplantation according to participation in anatomy camp program. Korean Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2017;30(3):99-107. http://doi.org/10.11637/kjpa.2017.30.3.99
  21. Oh JH, Chung SW. Multivariate analysis for clinicians. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2013;16(1):63-72. http://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2013.16.1.63
  22. Lee KS, Choi EO, Jeong JS. Survey of curriculum for 4 subjects (structure and function of human body, clinical microbiology, pathophysiology, & mechanism and effect of drugs) of biological nursing in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Korean biological nursing science. 2014;16(1):17-25. http://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2014.16.1.17
  23. Wharrad HJ, Allcock N, Chapple M. A survey of the teaching and learning of biological sciences on undergraduate nursing courses. Nurse Education Today. 1994;14(6):436-442. http://doi.org/10.1016/0260-6917(94)90004-3
  24. Jordan S, Davies S, Green B. The biosciences in the pre-registration nursing curriculum:Staff and students' perceptions of difficulties and relevance. Nurse Education Today. 1999;19(3):215-226. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0260-6917(99)80007-0
  25. Han SJ. The impact of TBL (team-based learning) on nursing students. Journal of Digital Convergence. 2013;11(11):595-602. http://doi.org/10.14400/jdpm.2013.11.11.595
  26. Kim Y, Kim NR. Design and implementation of team-based learning of ‘pharmacology’. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2015;15(4):309-334.
  27. Doubleday EG, O'Loughlin VD, Doubleday AF. The virtual anatomy laboratory:Usability testing to improve an online learning resource for anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2011;4(6):318-326. http://doi.org/10.1002/ase.252
  28. Kim JH, Park IH, Shin S. Systematic review of Korean studies on simulation within nursing education. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2013;19(3):307-319. http://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.3.307
  29. Richards DA, Hamers JP. RCTs in complex nursing interventions and laboratory experimental studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2009;46(4):588-592. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.12.002
  30. Antepohl W, Herzig S. Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in a course of basic pharmacology: A controlled, randomized study. Medical Education. 1999;33(2):106-113. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00289.x