한국농공학회논문집 (Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers)

  • 제60권3호
  • /
  • Pages.83-94
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1738-3692(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-7709(eISSN)
한국농공학회 (The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

농촌중심지활성화(선도지구) 사업에 대한 성과평가 방안으로서의 논리모델 적용 가능성 탐색: 영월군 지역역량강화 분야를 중심으로

A Study to Apply the Logic Model for Evaluating Outcomes of Revitalization Projects of Rural Centers: Focusing on Regional Capacity Strengthening in Yeongwol-gun

  • Kim, Kisung (Department of Regional Infrastructure Engineering, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Jeong, Meekyung (Department of Social Welfare, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Na, Kweonhee (Mplan corporation)
  • 투고 : 2017.12.15
  • 심사 : 2018.03.27
  • 발행 : 2018.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study aims to apply the logic model in order to evaluate outcomes of revitalization projects of rural centers as a part of the regional capacity strengthening in Yeongwol-gun. According to the study results, first of all, it was unclear to answer for questions what, how and why to lead the project, when examining logical associations among program inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes. As an alternative method, the logic model has been applied, and this in turn led to clarify the goals, inputs, contents, outputs, outcomes as well as overall outcome goals and purpose of the current projects. Second of all, the initial, intermediate and long term outcome goals of the current project were indistinctly specified, and moreover, their evaluation methods were also unclear. By applying the logic model to the current regional capacity strengthening project, it was able to figure the distinction between program outputs and outcomes, and specify initial, intermediate and long term target goals as well as their evaluation tools. It is therefore to conclude that the logic model has a possibility to apply to a project evaluation, especially in the sense that this method considers efficiency, effectiveness and accountability of each project.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chai, J. H., 2010. Analysis on the Economic Accomplishment and Spill-Over Effect of Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project. Ph.D thesis of Chonnam National University (in Korean).
  2. Her, J. Y., 2009. A Study on the Residents' Participation and Satisfaction Levels for the Integrated Rural Village Development Project - With Reference to the Gyeonbuk Rural Village Development Projects - M. A. Thesis of Yeongnam University (in Korean).
  3. Hong, S. G., J. H. Park, J. S. Han, and S. J. Lee, 2012. ODA Evaluation Based on the OECD DAC Performance Evaluation Principles: Case Study of Korean-Vietnamese Vacational Training Institute. Journal of The Korea Association for Comparative Economics 19(1): 101-149 (in Korean).
  4. Kim, B. K., and J. H. Yun, 2008. Designing and Evaluating the Program Logic Model: revitalizing business for rural development. Journal of Korean Society and Public Administration 19(2): 97-122 (in Korean).
  5. Kim, K. R., Y. S. Choi, and S. K. Hong, 2006. Development of An Interim Evaluation System for Integrated Rural Village Cluster Development Project. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 12(2): 75-86 (in Korean).
  6. Kim, Y. O., M. K. Jeong, and K. S. Kim, 2016. The Analysis on Development and Effect of Co-farming Program for the Rural Elderly Farmers. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 22(4): 115-129 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2016.22.4.115
  7. Lee, J. H., 2007. An Analysis of Comprehensive Rural Clustered Community Development Program about Types of Rural Community. Journal of Korea Planners Association 12(4): 45-56 (in Korean).
  8. Lim, J. H., 2013. A study on developing guideline of ODA result analysis on Education: Focus on PDA performance indicator, KOICA (in Korean).
  9. Martin, L. L., and P. M. Kettner, 2010. Measuring the Performance of Human Service Programs, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 147.
  10. McLaughin, J. A., and J. B. Gretchen, 2004. Using Logic Models. In Joseph, S., H. P. Wholey, and H. E. Kathryn, 2004. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (2nd.). Jossey-Bass. Newcomer (eds.).
  11. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, 2013. Reference to carry forward Revitalization of Rural Development Project (in Korean).
  12. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, and Korea Rural Community Cooperation. The white book of Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project (2004-2009) (in Korean).
  13. Moon, J. Y., 2007. Commonality Analysis between Program Logic Model and Performance Management System in Government Programs - A Case Study of Kaesong Industrial Complex -. Korean journal of policy analysis and evaluation 17(4): 87-116 (in Korean).
  14. Park, S. Y., 2010. Korean Educational Official Development Assistance: Currents and Challenges. Asian Journal of Education 11(1): 1-23 (in Korean).
  15. Poster, J. J., 2004. "Performance Monitoring". In Wholey, I. S., H. P. Hatry, and K. E. Newcomer (eds), Handbook of practical program evaluation, San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
  16. Reid, S. D., and L. Foetune, 2003. "Empirical foundations for practice guidelines in current social work knowledge". In A. Rosen, and E. Proctor (Eds). Developing practice guidelines for social work intervention (pp.59-82). NY: Columbia University Press.
  17. Rho, W. J., 2010. The Social Reconstruction of Policy Design and the Use of Developmental Evaluation: Focused on the Saemaul Movement Policy. Journal of The Korea Association for Policy Studies 19(4): 1-40 (in Korean).
  18. Rust, R. T., and R. L. Oliver, 1994. Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice. CA: Sage Publications.
  19. Song, M. R., 2004. Evaluation of rural village development programs and suggestions for participatory village development model. Korea Rural Economic Institute 10(2): 45-58 (in Korean).
  20. Suh, J. M., 2014. Policy to strengthening community competence. Way of agriculture and farming (in Korean).
  21. Wholey, J. S., 1983. Evaluation and effective public management. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, Co.