Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study of Major Constructivist Teaching & Learning Strategies for Developing Learners' Expertise in Architectural Design - With a Focus on Problem-based Learning(PbBL), Case-based Learning(CBL), Project-based Learning(PjBL) -

건축설계 전문성 개발을 위한 구성주의 수업전략 탐색 연구 - 문제중심학습, 사례기반학습, 프로젝트중심학습을 중심으로 -

  • Lee, Do-Young (Department of Architectural Engineering, Andong National University)
  • Received : 2017.11.10
  • Accepted : 2018.02.07
  • Published : 2018.03.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study pursued to obtain 3 consecutive purposes. First, a conceptual model for comparing 3 constructivist teaching and learning strategies( problem-based learning[$P_bBL$], case-based learning[CBL] and project-based learning[$P_jBL$]) was developed. Relationships of these constructivist strategies with the development of expertise for learners were discussed. Second, specific differences between $P_bBL$, CBL and $P_jBL$ as applied in architectural design courses were analyzed under each of the teaching and learning category. Some analytical indexes were developed by content analysis, which are applicable effectively to reveal the differences. Based on the previous findings, third, a set of strategic guidelines for use in class were made and suggested in order to develop and improve expertise in architectural design. These guidelines were largely targeted for university design courses as well as education or reeducation of practicing architects. Expecially, combined application of $P_bBL$, CBL and $P_jBL$ was hypothesized and suggested as class management guidelines. In sum, a variety of $P_bBL$ problems, CBL cases and $P_jBL$ projects should be developed for expecting audience based on design subjects and tasks. As working domains of practicing architects, exploring/analyzing, understanding/making applications, and criticizing/self-reflecting should be considered in the development process.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 안동대학교

References

  1. Alexander, C. & Poyer, B. (1984). The Atoms of environmental structure. In N. Cross(Eds.), Development in Design Methodology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 123-133.
  2. Bailey, K. (1994). Methods of Social Research(4th edition), New York, The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan, Inc.
  3. Barrows, H. (1986). A Taxonomy of problem-based learning methods, Journal of Medical Education, 68, 481-486.
  4. Barrows, H. (1988). The Tutorial Process(3rd edition), Illinois, Southern Illinois University Press.
  5. Buck Institute for Education. (2016). What is project-based learning(PBL)?, http://www.bie.org/about/what_is_pbl/.
  6. Cho, Y. (2006). Theory and practice of problem-based learning; Class started with problems, Seoul, Hakjisa.
  7. Choi, I. & Lee, K. (2009). Designing and implementing a case-based learning environment for enhancing ill-structured problem solving, Education Tech Research Dev., 57(1), 99-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9089-2
  8. Choi, I. (2016). Three pedagogical principles to enhance students' clinical decision making, Health professions faculty development series, pedagogy & practice workshops(28 Jan.), Center for teaching and learning @UGA.
  9. Collins, A. & Stevens, A. (1983). A cognitive theory of inquiry teaching. In C. Reigeluth(Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status, Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  10. Drake, S. (1998). Creating integrated curriculum, California, Crown Press, Inc.
  11. Duffy, T. & Jonasseen, D. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instruction, Educational Technology, 31(5), 7-12.
  12. Edutopia. (2017). Project-based Learning, http://www.edutopia.org/project-based-learning-intorduction-video.
  13. Jonassen, D. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A Handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments, New York, Routledge.
  14. Katherine, K. (1996). Cases and case methods in teacher education. In J. Sikula(edited), The Handbook of Research on Teacher Education(2nd edition), New York, Teachers College Press, 722-744.
  15. Kilpatrick, W. (1918). The project method: The use of purposeful act in the educative process, New York City, Teachers College, Columbia University.
  16. Korea Architectural Accrediting Board. (2005). An introduction to KAAB, http://www.kaab.or.kr/html/sub01_2.asp.
  17. Korean Society of Educational Psychology. (2000). Dictionary of technical terms for educational psychology, http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1943842&cid=41989&categoryId=41989.
  18. Korean Institute of Registered Architects Education Board. (2012). Goal of KIRA EB Activities, http://www.kiraeb.or.kr/intro/gole.
  19. Lee, D. (2005). Research Methodology for Beginning Scholars in Architecture and Design, Seoul, Space-time.
  20. Lee, D. (2016). Research Methodology Listening by Story: A Case of Content Analysis Research for Preparing a Thesis in the Architecture and Design Field, Seoul, Space-time.
  21. Lee, D. & Chung, H. (2008). Investigating Constructivist Approach to Design Studio Courses in Universities of U.S.A. and U.K., Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 24(6), 149-160.
  22. Levin, P. (1984). Decision-making in urban design. In N. Cross(Eds.), Development in Design Methodology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 107-121.
  23. Lorch, R., Lorch, E., Calderhead, W., Dunlap, E., Hodell, E. & Freer, B. (2010). Learning the control of variables strategy in higher and lower achieving classrooms; Contributions of explicit instruction and experimentation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017972
  24. Perry, W. (1999). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  25. Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: equilibration of cognitive structures, Oxford, Viking.
  26. Rittel, H. & Webber, M. (1984). Planning Problems are Wicked Problems. In N. Cross(Eds.), Development in Design Methodology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 135-166.
  27. Simon, H. (1984). The Structure of Ill-structured Problems. In N. Cross(Eds.), Development in Design Methodology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 145-166.
  28. Tawfik, A., Rong, H. & Choi, I. (2015). Failure to learn: towards a unified design approach for failure-based learning, Education Tech Research Dev., 63(6), 975-994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9399-0
  29. Torp, L. & Sage, S. (1998). Problems as Possibilities: Problem-Based Learning for k-12 Education(1st Edition), Alexandria, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  30. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. (2002) Cultivating communities of practices, Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
  31. Wikipedia(a). (2016). Problem-based learning, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem-based_learning.
  32. Wikipedia(b). (2016). Project-based learning, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project-based_learning.
  33. William, S. (1992). Putting Case-Based Instruction into Context: Examples from Legal and Medical Education, The Journal of the Sciences, 2(4), 367-427.