디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권5호
  • /
  • Pages.477-485
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지적장애인 지원욕구 측정을 위한 구성 요인 연구

A Study on the Construct Measurement of Support Needs for People with Intellectual Disabilities

  • 윤재영 (삼육대학교 사회복지학과) ;
  • 박찬오 (삼육대학교 대학원 사회복지학과) ;
  • 박상원 (중앙대학교 대학원 사회복지학과)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.31
  • 심사 : 2018.05.20
  • 발행 : 2018.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 지적장애인의 지원욕구 측정에 필요한 구성 요인을 확인하는 것이다. 이를 위해 개별지원서비스의 경험을 가진 19명의 장애인복지현장 실천가들이 196명의 지적장애인을 인터뷰하여 수집한 지원욕구 조사 결과에 대해 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 이를 통해 6개 영역 20개 문항으로 구성된 지원욕구 측정에 필요한 구성체를 확인하였다. 이들 구성 요인(자기관리, 건강관리, 의사소통, 대인관계, 주간활동, 가정 지역사회 활동)은 ICF 및 SIS-A와 비교할 때, 건강관리영역이 강조된 반면 공동체 생활, 사회생활 그리고 시민생활의 영역은 축소된 특성을 보여주었다. 국내에 지적장애인을 위한 개별지원서비스가 도입되는 초기 단계에서 단순하게 구성된 척도의 활용 가능성을 논의하였으며, 향후 더욱 규모 있는 조사연구를 통해 표준 점수가 산출될 필요성에 대해 언급하였다.

This study is to find construction factors of assessing the support needs of people with intellectual disabilities. For this purpose, 19 social welfare activists of the disabled having experiences in individual support services interviewed 196 persons with intellectual disabilities and based on the interview results, confirmatory factor analysis has been conducted. The study has found a construct of 6 areas and 20 items to assess the support needs. Compared to ICF and SIS-A, it shows the health care area has been emphasized while community life, social life and civic life have decreased. The study discusses the possibility of using the simple scale in the early stage of introduction of individual support services for people with intellectual disabilities in South Korea and the normative scores are needed to be produced by additional larger scale survey studies in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. D. W. Han & M. C. Kang. (2013). Study on smart contents development directions for children with autistic disorder to enhance adaptive behavior. The journal of Digital Policy & Management, 11(10), 123-131
  2. Drew, C. J. & Hardman, M. L. (2007). Intellectual disabilities across the lifespan. Recording for the Blind & Dyslexic.
  3. Kettner, P. M., Moroney, R. M. & Martin, L. L. (2012). Designing and managing programs: An effectiveness-based approach. Sage Publications.
  4. O'Brien, J., Pearpoint J. & Kahn L. (2010). The PATH & MAPS Handbook: Person-centered Ways to Build Community. Inclusion Press. Toronto: Canada.
  5. Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M. & Shogren, K. A. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 444 North Capitol Street NW Suite 846, Washington, DC 20001.
  6. Rimmerman, A. (2017). Disability and Community Living Policies. Cambridge University Press.
  7. H. M. Han, J. S. Sin, G. B. Yoon. (2011). Supports Intensity Scale-User's Manual. Seoul: Sigmapress Publishing Co. ISBN: 9788958329749(8958329742)
  8. Richies, V. C., Parmenter, T. R., Llewellyn, G., Hindmarsh, G. & Chan, J. (2009). I-CAN: A new instrument to Classify Support Needs for People with Disability: Part I. Journal of Applied Research in intellectual disability, 22, 326-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00466.x
  9. Wile, D. E. (2014). Why doers do-part 1: Internal elements of human performance. Performance Improvement, 53(2), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21394
  10. Wile, D. E. (2014b). Why doers do-Part 2: External-tangible elements of human performance. Performance Improvement, 53(3), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21398
  11. Wile, D. E. (2014c). Why Doers Do-Part 3: External‐ Intangible Elements of Human Performance. Performance Improvement, 53(4), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21404
  12. support. (n.d). Dictionalry.com: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/support
  13. M. Lombardi & L. Croce. (2016). Aligning supports planning within a Quality-of-Life Outcomes Framework. in Cross-cultural quality of life: Enhancing the lives of people with intellectual disability. edited by R. L. Schalock and K. D. Keith, 81-92.
  14. Thompson, J. R., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H., Schalock, R. L., Shogren, K. A., Snell, M. E. & Gomez, S. C. (2009). Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 47(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-47.2.135
  15. Power, A., Lord, J. E., & DeFranco, A. S. (2013). Active citizenship and disability: Implementing the personalisation of support. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Arnold, S. R., Riches, V. C. & Stancliffe, R. J. (2011). Intelligence is as intelligence does: Can additional support needs replace disability?. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 36(4), 258-262. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2011.617732
  17. Thompson, J. R. Wehmeyer M. L., Hughes C., Shogren K. A., Seo H., Little T. D., Schalock R. L., et al. (2016). Support Intensity Scale-Children's Version User's Manual. Washington, DC: AAIDD.
  18. World Health Organization(WHO). (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health(ICF). Geneva, Switzerland.
  19. Seoul Independent Living Center. (2017). Objective conditions for successful human-centered support: Key success indicators that capture quality of service. Seoul, Korea.
  20. Smull M. W., and SandersonH. 2005. Essential Lifestyle Planning for Everyone. The Learning Community. Annapolis: MD.
  21. https://www.i-can.org.au/
  22. J. Y. Yoon & G. C. Jeon. (2016). Conceptualizing the Support Needs of People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Disability and Welfare, 16(33), 123-148.
  23. H. S. Lee. (2007). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS 6.0. Seoul : BOBMUNSA.
  24. W. P. Kim. (2008). Structural equation model analysis using Amos. Seoul: Society and Statistics.
  25. Arnold, S. R., Riches, V. C. & Stancliffe, R. J. (2014). I‐CAN: The Classification and Prediction of Support Needs. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12055
  26. Arnold, S. R., Riches, V. C., & Stancliffe, R. J. (2015). Does a Measure of Support Needs Predict Funding Need Better Than a Measure of Adaptive and Maladaptive Behavior?. American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 120(5), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-120.5.375