디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권5호
  • /
  • Pages.199-206
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공익광고캠페인의 호감도와 몰입의 관계에서 자기조절체계의 매개효과

Mediating Effects of Self-Regulatory System between Ad Liking and Emotional Engagement in Public Service Announcements

  • Yang, Byunghwa (Department of Psychology, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.06
  • 심사 : 2018.05.20
  • 발행 : 2018.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 공익광고캠페인에서 청중의 호감적 태도와 정서적 몰입 간의 관계를 매개하는 자기조절체계의 효과를 다루었다. 이를 위해 먼저 여러 유형의 정서적 유인가를 지닌 공익캠페인을 자극으로 선정하고 이들 공익캠페인에 대한 평가와 실천의도를 측정하였다. 연구 참여자는 70명의 대학생이었고 평균 연령은 22.49(SD=3.22)이었다. 연구결과, 공익캠페인에 대한 호감도는 정서적 몰입에 긍정적 영향을 주고, 정서적 몰입은 다시 캠페인 실천의도에 영향을 주었다. 특히 본 연구결과는 향상 초점 체계는 캠페인에 대한 호감도와 몰입의 관계를 유의미하게 매개하는 반면, 방어 초점 체계는 호감도와 몰입의 관계를 매개하는 효과가 상대적으로 미약한 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 사회적 이슈를 설득할 목적의 공익캠페인이 청중에게 성취감과 자기향상의 열망과 같은 긍정적 메시지를 전달할 때 효과적일 수 있음을 시사한다.

The current study investigated mediating effects of self-regulatory system in the context of public service announcements (PSAs). We conducted a survey to collect participants' orientation of self-regulatory systems, emotional response and evaluation of PSAs. A total of 70 undergraduate students with mean age of 22.49 (SD = 3.22). Results showed that emotional engagement to the PSAs is affected by ad liking and, in turn, directly influences intention to act as a campaign outcome. Furthermore, our findings suggested that promotion-oriented individuals are more likely to commit PSA messages than do the prevention-oriented individuals. Therefore, messages of the PSA campaign should include hope and aspiration, indicating the connection of accomplishment and advancement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. Paek, T. Hove, M. Kim & H. J. Jeong. (2011). Mechanisms of Child Abuse Public Service Announcement Effectiveness: Roles of Emotional Response and Perceived Effectiveness. Health Communication, 26(6), 534-545. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2011.558334
  2. E. T. Higgins. (2012). Beyond Pleasure and Pain: How Motivation Works. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. E. T. Higgins. (1997). Beyond Pleasure and Pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
  4. R. P. Bagozzi & D. J. Moore. (1994). Public Service Advertisement: Emotions and Empathy Guide Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 56-70. DOI: 10.2307/1252251
  5. H. Yu. (2012). Producing More Persuasive Antiviolence Messages for College Students: Testing the Effects of Framing, Information Sources, and Positive/Negative Fact Appeal. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(9), 1631-1654. DOI: 10.1177/0886260511423248
  6. J. Park. (2017). A Study on the Effective Ways of Charity Campaigns: Focused on a Classification of Charity Case Studies. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(12), 227-234. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.12.227
  7. M. Hota, R. C. Caceres, & A. Cousin. (2010). Can Public-Service Advertising Change Children's Nutrition Habits?: The Impact of Relevance and Familiarity. Journal of Advertising Research, 50(4), 460-477. DOI: 10.2501/S0021849910091610
  8. H. A. Taute, B. A. Huhmann, & R. Thakur. (2010). Emotional Information Management: Concept and Measure Development in Public Service Announcements. Psychology & Marketing, 27(5), 417-444. DOI: 10.1002/mar.20337
  9. B. Yang & A. Jo. (2017). The Effect of Affective Valence, Perceived Self-Relevance, and Visual Attention on Attitudes toward PSA's Issues: Moderated Mediation of Digital EEG Arousal. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(3), 107-117. DOI: 10.14400/JDC.2017.15.3.107
  10. A. Lang & N. S. Yegiyan. (2008). Understanding the Interactive Effects of Emotional Appeal and Claim Strength in Health Messages. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 52(3), 432-447. DOI: 10.1080/08838150802205629
  11. A. M. Isen, T. E. Nygren & F.G. Ashby. (1988). The Influence of Positive Affect on the Subjective Utility of Gains and Losses: It's Just Not Worth the Risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 710-717. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.710
  12. K. Naumann, J. Bowden & M. Gabbott. (2017). A Multi-Valenced Perspective on Consumer Engagement Within a Social Service. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 25(20), 171-188. DOI: 10.1080/10696679.2016.1270772
  13. R. Batra & M. L. Ray. (1986). Affective Responses Mediating Acceptance of Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 234-249. DOI: 10.1086/209063
  14. H. Chung, E. Ahn & S. Kang. (2016). Processing Anti-Smoking Ads among College Students: The Role of Emotional Response and Level of Smoking. Journal of Promotion Management, 22(3), 370-385. DOI: 10.1080/10496491.2016.1154918
  15. W. S. Jung & J. Villegas. (2011). The Effects of Message Framing, Involvement, and Nicotine Dependence on Anti-Smoking Public Service Announcements. Health Marketing Quarterly, 28(3), 219-231. DOI: 10.1080/07359683.2011.595641
  16. J. Kwon. (2017). A Study on Improvement Direction of Public Service Advertisement to Prevent Drowsiness Driving on Highway. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(11), 77-83. DOI: 10.14400/JDC.2017.15.11.77
  17. I. P. Levin, S. L. Schneider & G. J. Gaeth. (1998). All Framed Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149-188. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
  18. G. Zhao & C. Pechmann. (2007). The Impact of Regulatory Focus on Adolescents' Response to Antismoking Advertising Campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 671-687. DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.44.4.671
  19. Y. H. Cheng, H. R. Yen, S. C. Chuang & C. J. Chang. (2013). Product Option Framing Under the Influence of a Promotion versus Prevention Focus. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 402-413. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2013.06.003
  20. R. Roy & I. Phau. (2014). Examining Regulatory Focus in the Information Processing of Imagery and Analytical Advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 371-381. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2014.888323
  21. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
  22. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI: 10.2307/3151312