DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Analysis on Quality of Life for Coastal and Non-coastal Residents

연안지역과 비연안지역 주민 '삶의 질' 비교분석

  • Seong, Eun-hye (Department of Maritime Administration, National Korea Maritime & Ocean University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Goo (Department of Maritime Administration, National Korea Maritime & Ocean University)
  • 성은혜 (한국해양대학교 해양행정학과) ;
  • 김상구 (한국해양대학교 해양행정학과)
  • Received : 2018.01.09
  • Accepted : 2018.04.27
  • Published : 2018.04.30

Abstract

This study aims to compare and analyze the quality of life of residents between those living in coastal and non-coastal areas. The indicators for the quality of life were divided into three different sectors. First, the economic sector observed the rate of population growth, the number of businesses per 1000 people, the employment and unemployment rate. The second was the environmental sector, which included the number of car registrations per capita, water supply and sewer service ratio, the urban park composition area per 1000 people and the road pavement rate. Thirdly, the social sector comprising data about the number of students per teacher, the number of sickbeds in medical institutions per 1000 people, the rate of traffic accidents per 1000 cars and the portion of social welfare budget in general accounting. The analysis method of standardized indicators and T-Test were carried out in 24 coastal cities and 51 non-coastal cities across the country. Results of the indicator comparison suggested there were significant differences in the number of businesses per 1000 people, the road pavement rate and the rate of traffic accidents per 1000 cars. From the results of each sector comparison, the coastal cities showed a higher value than non-coastal cities only in the economic sector. The quality of life comparison showed that coastal cities were better than non-coastal cities but were not statistically significant.

본 연구의 목적은 연안지역과 비연안지역 주민의 삶의 질을 객관적 지표를 이용하여 비교분석하는 것이다. 삶의 질에 대한 측정지표는 세 부문으로 구분하여 선정했다. 첫째, 경제부문에는 인구증가율, 인구 1000명당 사업체 수, 고용률, 실업률을 선택했다. 둘째, 환경부문에는 일인당 자동차 등록대수, 상수도 및 하수도 보급률, 인구 1000명당 도시공원 조성 면적, 도로포장률을 포함했다. 셋째, 사회부문에는 교원 1인당 학생수, 인구 1000명당 의료기관 병상 수, 자동차 1000대당 교통사고 발생률, 일반회계 중 사회복지예산 비중을 선정했다. 전국 24개 연안도시와 51개 비연안도시를 대상으로 표준화지표분석기법 및 평균차이검증(t-test)을 실시하였다. 측정지표별 비교결과, 두 집단간 인구 1000명당 사업체 수, 도로포장률, 자동차 1000대당 사고발생률에서 유의미한 차이가 나타났다. 각 부문별 비교결과, 경제부문에서만 연안도시가 비연안도시에 비해 높은 것이 유의미하게 나타났다. 삶의 질 비교결과, 연안도시가 비연안도시에 비해 높게 나타났으나, 통계적으로 유의미하지는 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, D. O.(2001), A Study on Evaluation Factors of ICZM in Korea, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 67-87.
  2. Choi, J. Y., H. J. Choi, J. D. Kim, J. H. Jeong and C. O. Shin(2007), Development of Coastal Indicators and Survey Guideline, Korea Maritime Institute, pp. 1-384.
  3. Jeong, S. K.(2014), The Life Style and Quality of Life (QOL) of Urban Residents, Journal of Social Science, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 137-161.
  4. Kang, S. C. and S. G. Kim(1999), A Comparative Study on Objective Environmental Condition and Subjective Environmental Satisfaction, Korean Society and Public Administration, Vol. 15, No. 3, p. 231.
  5. Kim, S. G.(2010), A Comparative Analysis 'Quality of Life' in Sea Port Cities - Focused on the Influence of Port-, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 287-293.
  6. Kim, S. G(2012), A Study on Port's Influence over 'Quality of Life' in Sea Port Cities - Compare China Dalian Port with Busan Port -, Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 481-488. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2012.36.6.481
  7. Kim, H. J.(1993), Statistical Analysis of Social Science - 3rd Edition, Samyoungsa, pp. 100-102.
  8. Lee, T. J. and K. S. Song(2012), Factors Influencing on Environmentally Sound and Sustainable Development & Quality of Life in City, Korean Policy Sciences Review, Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 185-213.
  9. Lee, S. C.(2011a), Quality Level of and Influence Factor on Life Classified with Urban Community Types: Centering on Daegu, The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 97-119.
  10. Lee, S. U.(2011b), The Policy Directions and Tasks for Improving the Quality of Life of Islanders, Planning and Policy, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, pp. 14-22.
  11. Lee, W. I. and S. G. Kim(1999), A Study on Expenses Priority for Improving Environment of Local Government, Journal of Korean Association for Local Government Studies, Vol. 27, p. 11.
  12. Lee, W. I., S. G. Kim and D. Y. Kim(2000), An Analysis on 'Quality of Life' as Urban Growth Indicators, Journal of Korean Association for Local Government Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 199-219.
  13. Lee, Y. G. and D. K. Kim(2007), A Study on the Quality of Life for Urban Residents, Korean Policy Sciences Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 223-250.
  14. Park, J. S.(2011), Geography of Quality of Life: Deprivation of London for 1981-1991, Seoul Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 61-71.
  15. Song, K. S. and Y. H. Kwen(2008), A Study on Quality of Life's Determinants of Metropolitan Areas, Journal of Local Government Studies, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 87-107.
  16. Song, M. Y.(2013), The Condition of the Coastal environment management of Gyeongibay, Issue & Analysis, No. 96, Gyeongi Research Institute, pp. 1-24.
  17. Yun, E. G.(2012), An Analysis of the Relative Importance of Assessment Factors of Quality of Life using AHP Method, Korean Public Administration Review, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 395-419.