Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Challenges of Public Policy Management for the 4th Industrial Revolution

제4차산업혁명에 대응하는 공공관리의 변화와 향후 과제: 사회-기술시스템론적 접근을 중심으로

  • Jin, Sang-Ki (National Assembly) ;
  • Bang, Min-Seok (Graduate School of Public Administration and Legal Studies, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2018.03.07
  • Accepted : 2018.04.20
  • Published : 2018.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper aim to propose and suggest for government to reinvent and re-steering the policy on the 4th industrial revolution in Korea. To do it, this paper annalize the advanced country's policies and hard-data sets from many international research institutes. So this paper emphasized the concept and frame of socio-technical system approach by Geels. According to this approach, this paper can get a conclusion that Korea government has to focus on the roles to solve the big social dilemma with high-tech tools from the 4th industrial revolution. And this paper point out the necessary of increasing the diversity and multidisciplinary in 4th industrial revolution policy of Korean government. These findings of this paper recommend for Korea to redesigns the governance mechanism and legislation platform and to design the future readiness.

본 연구는 우리나라 제4차 산업혁명 대응에 있어 사회-기술시스템론적 공공관리의 적용 가능성을 살펴보는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 제4차 산업혁명의 주요 개념과 논의점 검토와 함께 해외 선도국가들의 대응 전략을 국내외 문헌 연구를 통해 분석하였다. 이를 통해 본 연구는 기술 중심에서 벗어나 사회적 난제 해결과 인간중심의 사회 혁신을 위해 제4차 산업혁명을 이끄는 정부 정책기조의 변화 필요성을 강조하였다. 즉 제4차 산업혁명의 변화에 대응하여 사회적 난제를 해결하기 위해서는 기존의 수직적, 계층적, 분화적, 기계적 정부시스템을 과감히 탈피하고, 사회-기술시스템론적 공공관리 방식을 강조해야 한다고 보았다. 향후 정부의 정책 방향은 혁신을 확산할 수 있는 창발적이며 내재적인 모습을 보여야 하며, 정부조직과 정부운영방식의 재설계, 정부 정책영역의 재설정과 이를 입법적으로 뒷받침하는 입법행정의 공조 전략이 필요하다. 본 연구는 공공부문의 제4차 산업혁명 대응성 강화를 위한 정책연구의 첫 논의라는 점에 의미가 있으며 후속연구가 이러지기를 바란다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. K. Jin & Y. W. Park. (2017). The Study on the Institutionalism in The 4th Industrial Revolution Readiness of Korean Government, GRI REVIEW. 19(3), 467-496.
  2. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2016: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/
  3. S. H. Han. (2017). A Study on the Creative Institutionalization of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society. 20(3), 111-133.
  4. Schwab, klaus. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution, World Economic Forum.
  5. Plattform Industrie 4.0 (2013): Umsetzungsempfehlungen fur das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0, http://www.bmbf.de/pubrd/Umsetzungsempfehlungen_Industrie4_0.pdf
  6. Siemens. (2013): Industrie 4.0-The Fourth Industrial Revolution, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hprurtornis
  7. Bloem, J., Van Doorn, M., Duivestein, S., Excoffier, D., Maas, R., & Van Ommeren, E. (2014). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Things to Tighten the Link Between IT and OT. SOGETI.
  8. B. S. Hwang. (2016). Study on the Korean Convergency Policy. Seoul: Wongbo publish.
  9. B. S. Choi, H. T. Yang & J.Y. Lee. (2017). Advanced Countries's Policy and Insight of the 4th Industrial Revolution. STEPI Insight. 215. 1-25.
  10. D. E. Lee. (2017). The 4th Industrial Revolution and Innovation Policy. Science and Technology Policy, 27(5), 46-51.
  11. S. H. Kim & M. J. Kim. (2016). Industrial Innovation and Challenges for the Next Industrial Revolutions. Seoul. Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  12. W. K. Ha. (2015). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and New Approaches of Major Countries. Weekly Technology Trends(Aug. 26, 2015). Institute for Information & Communications Technology Promotion.
  13. H. Choi, B. S. Choi, S. G. Kim. (2017). Japan's 4th Industrial Revolution Policy and Implications. Trends & Issues, 30, 1-25. Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  14. W. C. Song. (2012). Socio-technical system theory and policy implications. Issues & Policy, 60, 1-13.
  15. Geels, F. W. (2004). "From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory". Research policy, 33(6-7), 897-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
  16. J. E. Seong, W. C. Song, Y. B. Chang, B. K. Jung, J. K. Han. (2009). Policy Coordination and Integration for Holistic Innovation Policy. Seoul. Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  17. M. S. Bang. (2017). A Study on the Change and Management of the Presidential Agenda in the Regime Change Period: Focused on the Setting of the Fourth Industrial Revolution Tasks, Korean Policy Sciences Review, 21(4), 43-70.
  18. J. H. Ku. (2017). A Study on the Platform for Big Data Analysis of Manufacturing Process, Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 7(5), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2017.7.5.177
  19. H. S. Byeon. (2017). The Status and Suggestions for Big Data Adaptation in the Government and the Public Agency, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(4), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.4.13
  20. S. K, Park. (2018). A Study of the Autonomous Vehicle Technology and its Future Trend: Focusing on Current Industry and Technology Convergence of Trend, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(1), 253-259, https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.1.253
  21. H. H. Lee & C. S. Leem. (2018). SWOT Analysis for Small and Medium Enterprise in Smart Factory introduction. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(3), 1-14, https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.3.001