DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relationship of the Subjective Happiness, Ego-resilience and Academic Achievement of Nursing Students : Focusing on the Giver, Taker, Matcher

간호대학생의 주관적 행복감, 자아탄력성, 학업성취도와의 관계: Giver, Taker, Matcher를 중심으로

  • Received : 2017.02.28
  • Accepted : 2018.04.20
  • Published : 2018.04.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship of the subjective happiness, ego-resilience and academic achievement by type of giver, taker, matcher of nursing students. First, in the result of the type of nursing students, the Taker(43.0%) was the largest, the Matcher (40.1%) was next, the Giver (16.9%) was the least. The mean score of subjective happiness, ego-resilience and academic achievement were 16.9, 94.1, 3.3, respectively. According to the personality type, the Giver reported the highest academic achievement. But the Taker reported the lowest subjective happiness, ego-resilience and academic achievement. There were significantly positive correlations between subjective happiness and ego-resilience(r=.511, p<.001), and ego-resilience and academic achievement (r=.215, p<.05).

본 연구는 간호대학생의 Giver, Taker, Matcher 유형을 확인하고 주관적 행복감, 자아탄력성, 학업성취도와의 관계를 파악하기 위하여 시도되었다. 전체 대상자를 Giver, Taker, Matcher 유형으로 구분한 결과, Giver는 16.9%, Taker는 43.0%, Matcher는 40.1%로 Taker 유형이 가장 많았다. 대상자의 주관적 행복감은 평균 16.9점이었고, 자아탄력성은 평균 94.1점, 학업성취도는 평균 3.3점으로 나타났다. 대상자 중 Giver 유형은 학업성취도가 가장 높았고, Matcher 유형은 주관적 행복감과 자아탄력성이 가장 높았다. Taker 유형은 주관적 행복감, 자아탄력성, 학업성취도 모두 세 유형 중 가장 낮게 나타났다. 대상자의 주관적 행복감이 높을수록 자아탄력성이 높았고(r=.511, p<.001), 자아탄력성이 높을수록 학업성취도가 높게 나타났다(r=.215, p<.05). 따라서 간호대학생의 학업성취와 삶의 질 향상을 위해 주관적 행복감과 자아탄력성을 향상시킬 수 있는 방안을 마련해야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. H. Jung & M. A. Sin. (2006). The Relationship between Self - esteem and Satisfaction in Major of Nursing Students. The Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 12(2), 170-177.
  2. R. M. Steers & J. S. Black. (1994). Organizational behavior, 5th ed., New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
  3. J. Watson. (1985). Nursing: human science and human care. A theory of nursing. Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  4. G. H. Jo. (2011). Perception of Undergraduate Nursing Students toward Happiness: A Q-Methodological Approach. The Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 17(2), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2011.17.2.178
  5. G. Jo. (2011). The Effects of 'Becoming Happy I' Program on Gratitude Disposition, Self-Esteem, Flow, and Subjective Happiness for Nursing Students. .Doctoral dissertation. Catholic university of Daegu, Daegu.
  6. D. Danner, D. Snowdon & W. Friesen. (2001). Positive emotionsin early life and longevity: Findings from the nun study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 804-813. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.804
  7. W. C. Compton. (2005). An introduction to positive psychology. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wads worth.
  8. J. Block & J. H. Block. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In W. A. Collins, Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology. 13, 39-101.
  9. Y. H. Kim. (2010). The Relation of Daily Stress and Ego-resilience to the Happiness of Children and Adolescents. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 17(12), 287-307.
  10. H. I. Jo & N. Y. Lee. (2010). A study on the relationship between academic achievement and ego-resiliency: Focusing on mediating effects of self-determination motivation. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 17(6), 1-20.
  11. A. S. Masten. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
  12. S. S. Luthar & D. Cicchetti. (2000). The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Development and Psychopathology, 12(4), 857-885. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400004156
  13. A. M. Grant. (2014). Give and Take: Why Helping Others Drives Our Success. New York: Penguin books.
  14. Sonja Utz, Nicole Muscanell & Anja S. Göritz. (2014). Give, match, or take: A new personality construct predicts resource and information sharing. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.011
  15. L. Filip. O. Deniz & D. Stephan. (2009). Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school. Journal of Applied Psychology. 94(6), 1514-1535. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016137
  16. S. Lyubomirsky & H. S. Lepper. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041
  17. I. J. Kim. (2006). Positive Psychology. Seoul: Moolpure.
  18. E. C. Klohnen. (1996). Conceptual analysis and measurement of the construct of ego-resiliency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1067-1079. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1067
  19. H. J. Park. (1996). Stress, coping and depression according to Ego-resilience. Master Thesis. Korea University, Seoul.
  20. J. H. Park & G. Jo. (2016). Predictors of subjectives happiness for male nursing students. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 27(2), 511-522. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2016.27.2.511
  21. J. W. Hwang. & G. H. Kim. (2009). The Relationship between Orientations to Happiness and Subjective Well-being among University Students. Korea Journal of Counseling, 10(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.10.1.200903.57
  22. S. H. Lee, B. R. Jung, & S. H. Kim. (2015). Influence on Subjective Happiness of University Students. Korean Society of Public Health Nursing, 29(1). 115-126. https://doi.org/10.5932/JKPHN.2015.29.1.115
  23. D. J. Kim. (2013). Influence of Ego-Resilience and Self-efficacy on Department Satisfaction of Nursing Student. Master Thesis. Hanyang University, Seoul.
  24. M. M. Tugade & B. L. Fredrickson. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psyhology, 86, 320-333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320
  25. T. D. Letzring, J. Block & D. C. Funder (2004). Ego-control and ego-resiliency: generalization of self-report scales based on personality descriptions from acquaintances, clinicians, and the self. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 395-422.
  26. B. Sigal & G. Donald. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 36-59. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.24286163
  27. E. Carlos, I. Alice & Y. Mark. (1997). Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(1), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2734