DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Food consumption behaviors of women by marital status: focus on the 2015 consumers survey data on food consumption behaviors

여성의 결혼여부에 따른 식품소비양상 연구 : 2015년 식품소비행태조사의 식품주 구입자 자료를 이용하여

  • Kim, Eun-kyung (Research Institute of Natural Science, Sangmyung University) ;
  • Ju, Se-Young (Major in Food Science, College of Biomedical and Health Science, Konkuk University)
  • 김은경 (상명대학교 자연과학연구소) ;
  • 주세영 (건국대학교 의료생명대학 식품학전공)
  • Received : 2018.01.19
  • Accepted : 2018.02.07
  • Published : 2018.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to analyze food consumption behavior of women by marital status based on the 2015 consumer survey data on Food Consumption Behaviors of the Korea Rural Economic Institute. Methods: We analyzed data describing 3,312 women aged 19 ~ 75 who were the main buyers of foods in their household. The food purchase patterns, dining-out behavior, and use of food-delivery and take-out were investigated. Results: Overall, 40.5% of unmarried women shopped for food once per week and 37.4% spent 200,000 ~ 400,000 won per month. Additionally, 43.1% of married women shopped 2 ~ 3 times per week and 26.6% spent 400,000 ~ 600,000 won (p < 0.0001). Dining-out frequency and one-time cost per person of dining-out for unmarried women were higher than those for married women. With delivery/take-out food frequency, 2 time per week was the highest rate among married women (34.6%) and once per week was the highest among unmarried women (31.2%) respectively. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate food consumption behaviors and trends of Korean women by marital status. This study provides basic data that will be useful for food industries establishing marketing strategies to better meet consumer demands.

본 연구는 농촌경제연구원에서 실시한 2015년 식품소비행태조사 자료를 이용하여 여성의 결혼여부에 따른 조사대상자의 일반적 사항, 식료품 구입행태, 외식행태, 배달 및 테이크아웃 이용 행태, 그리고 가공식품 및 조리식품 구입행태를 조사하였다. 식료품 구입 빈도에서는 미혼인 경우는 주 1회 (40.5%), 기혼인 경우는 주 2~3회 (43.1%)로 가장 높게 나타났다. 친환경 식품의 구매여부는 결혼여부와 관계없이 구매하지 않는 비율이 60%이상 (미혼 68.2%, 기혼 61.6%)으로 높게 나타났고, 기능성 식품의 복용률은 기혼여성 (54.2%)이 미혼여성 (44.9%)보다 높은 것으로 조사되었다. 결혼여부에 따른 외식행태는 미혼인 경우가 기혼인 여성보다는 외식을 더 많이 하는 것으로 조사되었고, 미혼인 경우는 한식당, 기혼은 고깃집을 외식장소로 주로 이용하는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 배달 및 테이크아웃의 소비행태에서는 기혼인 경우가 월 2회 (34.6%), 미혼은 월 1회 (31.2%)가 각각 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 배달 및 테이크아웃의 빈도는 외식횟수와는 달리 기혼인 경우가 더 높은 것으로 조사 되었다. 또한, 결혼여부에 따른 가공식품의 구입행태에서도 미혼여성이 기혼여성에 비교하여 대표적인 가공식품인 빵류, 과자류, 떡류 및 라면, 국수류의 구매 빈도가 더 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 여성의 결혼 여부에 따른 식품소비 행태인 식품 구매, 외식, 배달/테이크아웃 패턴을 비교 분석하였으며, 이러한 결과는 관련 연구와 산업에 기초자료로 활용되길 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Park M, Go DY, Koo JK, Lee KH. Analysis of the effects of structural demographic changes on the demand for services. Seoul: Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade; 2013.
  2. Bennett J, Dixon M. Single person households and social policy: looking forwards. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2006.
  3. Yeung WJ, Cheung AK. Living alone: one-person households in Asia. Demogr Res 2015; 32: 1099-1112. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.40
  4. Statistics Korea. Population and housing census 2015 [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2016 [cited 2018 Feb 6]. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr.
  5. Kim S, Hwang DS. Influence of life style on economic, health, and social preparations for old age: a comparison between single-person and multiple-person households. Consumption Cult Study 2017; 20(3): 227-254. https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2017.20.3.011
  6. Statistics Korea. Population and housing census 2016 [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2017 [cited 2018 Feb 6]. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr.
  7. Park JH, Lee SH, Han SH. An analysis on expenditure pattern on cultural consumption of single households. Sejong: Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade; 2015.
  8. Park MS, Koh DY, Goo JK. An analysis on consumption expenditure pattern by household characteristics. Seoul: Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade; 2014.
  9. Ban JH. Social and economic characteristics and change of single-person households. Mon Labor Rev 2012; (85): 55-67.
  10. Kim YA. A study on single people's satisfaction of convenience foods and repurchase intention according to food-related lifestyle [dessertation]. Seoul: Sookmyung Women's University; 2015.
  11. Jung J, Kim TH, Bae HJ. A study of perception and consumption behavior of consumers with regards to local food and eco-friendly food. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2017; 23(2): 104-116. https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2017.23.2.011
  12. Jung JH, Hwang JH, Lee SB. A study on the relationship between lifestyle and the dining-out purchase behavior: focused on women in twenties and thirties. Korea J Tourism Hosp Res 2012; 26(3): 97-114.
  13. Han SH. Married woman's family life management behavior: consumer's purchase behavior, dietary life behavior, and satisfaction of well-being oriented food. J Korean Fam Resour Manage Assoc 2010; 14(2): 127-152.
  14. Mun SR, Cho YB. The effects of dining out choice attributes on behavioral intention according to foodservice consumption. J Foodserv Manage 2017; 20(5): 51-72.
  15. Lee SL. The effect of household demographic trend on food expenditure pattern. Consumption Cult Study 2014; 17(3): 85-104.
  16. Jo PK. The effects of the economic characteristics of singleperson households on the food service industry. Korean J Community Nutr 2016; 21(4): 321-331. https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2016.21.4.321
  17. Yoon DH, Chae SA, Song ET. A survey on single households: 2014 vs. 2015 tracking survey. Seoul: Embrain; 2015.
  18. Jae MK, Jeon HR, Lee Y. Difference analysis of consumers for dietary life consumption behavior based on eating out and delivering or taking out food service. Consumption Cult Study 2017; 20(3): 27-50. https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2017.20.3.003
  19. Kim S, Lee K, Lee Y. Selection attributes of home meal replacement by food-related lifestyles of single-person households in South Korea. Food Qual Prefer. Forthcoming 2018.
  20. Ju SY. Study on importance-performance analysis regarding selective attributes of Home Meal Replacement (HMR). J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2012; 41(11): 1639-1644. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2012.41.11.1639
  21. Lee BS, Park KH, Cho JH. A study on the effect of selection attributes on consumer satisfaction and repurchase intention about HMR: in case of ready-to-endcook. Korean J Culinary Res 2011; 17(2): 85-97.
  22. Jang YJ, Kim WG, Yang IS. Mature consumers' patronage motives and the importance of attributes regarding HMR based on the food-related life styles of the upper middle class. Int J Hospit Manag 2011; 30(1): 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.06.001
  23. Yoo HJ. The effects of concerns on food safety and trust in label information on label use and willingness to pay among Korean consumers. Korean Rev Crisis Emerg Manage 2016; 12(2): 168-178.
  24. Kim MJ, Chong YK. Consumers' delivery and take-out behaviors and dietary-life satisfaction. J Foodserv Manage 2015; 18(6): 421-443.
  25. Choi KW, Bang DH. The segmentation of customers dining out: an application of Latent Class Analysis (LCA). J Tourism Sci 2017; 41(4): 131-149.
  26. Chung CE. Complex sample design effects and inference for Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Korean J Nutr 2012; 45(6): 600-612. https://doi.org/10.4163/kjn.2012.45.6.600
  27. Sung NK. Software packages for survey data analysis. Surv Res 2000; 1(1): 109-123.
  28. Korea Rural Economic Institute. An instruction for the consumers behavior survey for Food 2016 [Internet]. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute; 2016 [cited 2018 Jan 15]. Available from: http://foodsurvey.krei.re.kr/board/guide.
  29. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. An instruction for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018 [cited 2018 Jan 15]. Available from: https://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes/sub03/sub03_06_02.do.

Cited by

  1. One-Person Households in Terms of Household Development Theory vol.18, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.87.5
  2. 전북지역 어머니의 지속가능 식생활유형에 따른 영유아 자녀의 간식관리 및 간식제품에 대한 요구도 조사 vol.53, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.1.39