Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology (한국해양공학회지)

Korean Society of Ocean Engineers (한국해양공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Potential Explosion Risk Comparison between SMR and DMR Liquefaction Processes at Conceptual Design Stage of FLNG

FLNG개념설계 단계에서 SMR 및 DMR 액화공정의 잠재적 폭발위험도 비교

  • You, Wonwo (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chae, Minho (Hyundai Motor Company Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Park, Jaeuk (Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Lim, Youngsub (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2017.11.03
  • Accepted : 2018.04.12
  • Published : 2018.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

An FLNG (floating liquefied natural gas) or LNG FPSO (floating production, storage and offloading) unit is a notable offshore unit with the increasing demand for LNG. The liquefaction process on an FLNG unit is the most important process because it determines the economic feasibility, but would be a hazard source because of the large quantity of hydrocarbons. While a high efficiency process such as C3MR has been preferred for onshore liquefaction processes, a relatively simple process such as the SMR (single mixed refrigerant) or DMR (dual mixed refrigerant) liquefaction process has been selected for offshore units because they require a more compact size, lighter weight, and higher safety due to their space limitation for facilities and long distance from shore. It is known that an SMR has the advantages of a simple configuration, small footprint, and lower risk. However, with an increased production rate, the inherent safety of SMR needs to be evaluated because of its small train capacity. In this study, the potential explosion risks of the SMR and DMR liquefaction processes were evaluated at the conceptual design stage. The results showed that an SMR has a lower overpressure than a DMR at the same frequency, only with a small production capacity of 0.9 MTPA. With increased capacity, the overpressure of the SMR was higher than that of the DMR. The increased number of trains increased the frequency in spite of the small amount of equipment per train. This showed that the inherent risk of an SMR is not always lower than that of a DMR, and an additional risk management strategy is recommended when an SMR is selected as the concept for an FLNG liquefaction process compared to the DMR liquefaction process.

Keywords

References

  1. API, 2009. Specification for Oil and Gas Separators. American Petroleum Institute, Washington D.C. USA.
  2. Aspelund, A., Gundersen, T., Myklebust, J., Nowak, M., Tomasgard, A., 2010. An Optimization-simulation Model for a Simple LNG Process. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 34(10), 1606-1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.10.018
  3. Barclay, M., Yang, C., 2006. Offshore LNG: The Perfect Starting Point for the 2-Phase Expander? Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference, Houston USA.
  4. Barron, R., 1985. Cryogenic Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  5. Buijs, K., Pek, B., Nagelvoort, R., 2005. Shell's LNG Technology for 7-10 Mtpa LNG Trains. Proceedings of International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha Qatar.
  6. Bukowski, J., Liu, Y.N., Boccella, S., Kowalski, L., 2011. Innovations in Natural Gas Liquefaction Technology for Future LNG Plants and Floating LNG Facilities. Proceedings of International Gas Union Research Conference, Seoul South Korea.
  7. Corneliussen, M., Samnoy, E., 2015. Near Shore FLNG Concept Evaluations (Master thesis, NTNU). Available at (Accessed Apr 06 2018).
  8. Crowl, D.A., 2003. Understanding Explosions. Wiley-AIChE.
  9. Dan, S., Lee, C.J., Park, J., Shin, D., Yoon, E.S., 2014. Quantitative Risk Analysis of Fire and Explosion on the Top-side LNG-liquefaction Process of LNG-FPSO. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92(5), 430-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.04.011
  10. Drysdale, D., Sylvester-Evans, R., 1998. The Explosion and Fire on the Piper Alpha Platform, 6 July 1988. A Case Study. Philosophical Transactions Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 356(1748), 2929-2951. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1998.0304
  11. Gaumer, L., Newton, C., 1973. Combined Cascade and Multicomponent Refrigeration System and Method. US 3763658 A, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  12. GPSA, 2012. Engineering Data Book. Gas Processors Suppliers Association.
  13. Hocquet, J., 2013. Explosion Risk Analysis for FLNG Facilities. the Main Challenges Chemical Engineering, Trans. 31, 595-600.
  14. Hwang, J.H., Roh, M.I., Lee, K.Y., 2013. Determination of the Optimal Operating Conditions of the Dual Mixed Refrigerant Cycle for the LNG FPSO Topside Liquefaction Process. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 49, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.09.008
  15. Jewitt, I., 2015. FLNG Safety. In Gastech 2015, Singapore.
  16. Kanoglu, M., 2002. Exergy Analysis of Multistage Cascade Refrigeration Cycle Used for Natural Gas Liquefaction. International Journal of Energy Research, 26(8), 763-774. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.814
  17. Khan, M.S., Lee, M., 2013. Design Optimization of Single Mixed Refrigerant Natural Gas Liquefaction Process using the Particle Swarm Paradigm with Nonlinear Constraints. Energy. 49, 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.11.028
  18. Khan, M. S., Lee, S., Lee, M., 2012. Optimization of Single Mixed Refrigerant Natural Gas Liquefaction Plant with Nonlinear Programming. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 7(S1), S62-S70.
  19. Khan, M. S., Lee, S., Rangaiah, G., Lee, M., 2013. Knowledge Based Decision Making Method for the Selection of Mixed Refrigerant Systems for Energy Efficient LNG Processes. Applied energy, 111, 1018-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.010
  20. Kim, I.H., Dan, S., Cho, S., Lee, G., Yoon, E.S., 2014. Optimization of Single-stage Mixed Refrigerant LNG Process Considering Inherent Explosion Risks. Korean Chemical Engineering, 52(4), 467-474. https://doi.org/10.9713/kcer.2014.52.4.467
  21. Kim, J.S., Nam, K., Park, J., Kim, T.J., Kim, Y.C., 2013. Introduction to FLNG FEED Study. Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference.
  22. Lee, J., Jo, A., Lee, H., Park, K., 2015. Design Considerations for the Condensate Stabilization and Liquefaction Units in LNG FPSO. Proceedings of The 25th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference.
  23. Lee, S., Long, N.V.D., Lee, M., 2012. Design and Optimization of Natural Gas Liquefaction and Recovery Processes for Offshore Floating Liquefied Natural Gas Plants. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(30), 10021-10030. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2029283
  24. Lim, W., Tak, K., Moon, I., Choi, K., 2010. Simulation and Comparison of Liquefaction Technologies for LNG Offshore Plant Design. Proceedings of the 9th ISOPE Pacific/Asia Offshore Mechanics Symposium.
  25. Moein, P., Sarmad, M., Ebrahimi, H., Zare, M., Pakseresht, S., Vakili, S. Z., 2015. APCI-LNG Single Mixed Refrigerant Process for Natural Gas Liquefaction Cycle: Analysis and Optimization Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 26, 470-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.06.040
  26. Mokhatab, S., Mak, J.Y., Valappil, J.V., Wood, D.A., 2013. Handbook of Liquefied Natural Gas. Gulf Professional Publishing.
  27. Mokhatab, S., Poe, W.A., 2012. Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing. Gulf Professional Publishing.
  28. OGP, 2010a. Risk Assessment Data Directory - Ignition Probabilities. IOGP Report 434-06, International Association of Oil and Gas Producers.
  29. OGP, 2010b. Risk Assessment Data Directory - Process Release Frequencies. IOGP Report 434-01, International Association of Oil and Gas Producers.
  30. Paik, J.K., Czujko, J., Kim, B.J., Seo, J.K., Ryu, H.S., Ha, Y.C., Janiszewski, P., Musial, B., 2011. Quantitative Assessment of Hydrocarbon Explosion and Fire Risks in Offshore Installations. Marine Structures, 24(2), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.02.002
  31. Pek, B., van der Velde, H., 2013. A High Capacity Floating LNG Design. Proceedings of 17th International Conference and Exhibition on Liquified Natural gas (LNG 17), Houston USA.
  32. Pwaga, S.S., 2011. Sensitivity Analysis of Proposed LNG liquefaction Processes for LNG FPSO. Master Thesis, NTNU. Available at (Accessed Apr 6, 2018).
  33. Shell Global, 2016. Prelude FLNG - Overview. Retrieved from http://www.shell.com/about-us/major-projects/prelude-flng/pre lude-flng-an-overview.html
  34. Swenson, L.K., 1977. Single Mixed Refrigerant, Closed Loop Process for Liquefying Natural Gas. US 4033735 A, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  35. Talib, J.H., Germinder, B., 2016. Game-Changing Floating LNG Solutions. Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference.
  36. Talib, J.H., Price, B., 2011. Development of Floating LNG Production Units with Modular/Scalable SMR Processes. Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference.
  37. Timmerhaus, K.D., Flynn, T.M., 2013. Cryogenic Process Engineering. Springer.
  38. Venkatarathnam, G., Timmerhaus, K.D., 2008. Cryogenic Mixed Refrigerant Processes. Springer.
  39. Vinnem, J.-E., 2014. Offshore Risk Assessment: Principles, Modelling and Applications of QRA Studies. Springer.
  40. Wang, M., Zhang, J., Xu, Q., 2012. Optimal Design and Operation of a C3MR Refrigeration System for Natural Gas Liquefaction. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 39, 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.12.003
  41. Xu, X., Liu, J., Cao, L., 2014a. Optimization and Analysis of Mixed Refrigerant Composition for the PRICO Natural Gas Liquefaction Process. Cryogenics, 59, 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2013.11.001
  42. Xu, X., Liu, J., Cao, L., Pang, W., 2014b. Automatically Varying the Composition of a Mixed Refrigerant Solution for Single Mixed Refrigerant LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) Process at Changing Working Conditions. Energy, 64, 931-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.040
  43. Xu, X., Liu, J., Jiang, C., Cao, L., 2013. The Correlation between Mixed Refrigerant Composition and Ambient Conditions in the PRICO LNG Process. Applied Energy, 102, 1127-1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.031
  44. Yu, X., Xie, B., Wu, Y., Wang, C., Wang, Q., Cheng, B., 2015. Floating Liquid Natural Gas (FLNG) Liquefaction Process Analysis for South China Sea Deep Water Gas Fiel. Proceedings of the 25th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference.
  45. Zhao, W., Yang, J., Hu, Z., Wei, Y., 2011. Recent Developments on the Hydrodynamics of Floating Liquid Natural Gas (FLNG). Ocean Engineering, 38(14), 1555-1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.07.018