DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the actual state of learning competences in students at a college

J 대학교 재학생의 학습역량 실태조사

  • 송경희 (제주관광대학교 치위생과)
  • Received : 2018.10.24
  • Accepted : 2018.11.20
  • Published : 2018.12.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the learning competencies of students at a college from September 1 to November 30, 2017, in an effort to provide some information on how to foster learning competencies in college years, which lay the foundation for work and social lives. 1. The learning competencies of the subjects consisted of academic vision, student identity, cognitive regulation, emotional regulation, learning management and creating learning environments. Out of five points, they scored the highest in academic vision and student identity with 3.34, followed by learning management with 3.20, creating learning environments with 3.18, emotional regulation with 3.16 and cognitive regulation with 3.14. 2. There were statistically significant differences in academic vision according to age, the area of major, the academic credential of their fathers, commuting time, military service experience and career plans. 3. There were statistically significant differences in student identity and cognitive regulation according to gender, age, the area of major, the academic credential of their fathers, commuting time, military service experience and career plans. 4. There were statistically significant differences in emotional regulation according to age, the area of major, the academic credential of their fathers, commuting time, career plans and daily mean study hours. 5. There were statistically significant differences in learning management according to gender, age, the area of major, grade point average, the academic credential of their fathers, career plans and daily mean study hours. 6. There were statistically significant differences in creating learning environments according to gender, age, the area of major, the academic credential of fathers, commuting time, career plans and daily mean study hours. As they were poorest at the cognitive regulation area among the areas of learning competencies, self-directed learning programs that deal with how to study, learning process, how to take notes and arrange them, how to link different pieces of acquired knowledge and how to map out study plans should be developed to give support to students.

Keywords

References

  1. 윤정일, 김민성, 윤순경, 박민정. 인간으로서의 역랑에 대한 고찰: 역량의 특성과 차원. 교육학연구. 2007;45(3):233-260.
  2. 양홍권. 대학생용 학습역량 검사도구 개발 연구. 평생교육.HRD연구. 2016;12(1):31-66.
  3. 양흥권. 학업성취 우수 대학생의 학습역량 사례연구: 학습동기와 학습행동 영역을 중심으로. 교육문화연구. 2015;21(1):233-260.
  4. 이경화, 김은경, 고진영, 박춘성. 대학생용 학습역량 검사개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구. 2011;25(4):791-809.
  5. White, R.W. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competency. Psychological Review. 1959;66(5):297-333.
  6. McClelland, D.C. Testing for competency rather than for intelligence. American Psychological. 1993:28(1):126-161.
  7. 김혜연. 여자고등학교 학생의 내재적 동기와 부모의 관여가 학업성취에 미치는 영향: 자기조절학습능력의 매개효과를 중심으로. 서울대학교 석사학위논문. 2012.
  8. 이혜정, 성은모. 대학교육에서 대학생 중심의 교수설계를 위한 최우수 학습자의 학습특성과 학습전략 탐색. 교육공학연구. 2011;27(1):1-35.
  9. 박성희, 배상학. 학습포트폴리오를 적용한 대학생의 학습역량에 대한 사례연구. 학습자중심교과교육연구. 2008;8(2):159-179.
  10. 송상호, 신종호. 인터넷 환경에서의 사이버학습역량탐색. 교육정보방송연구. 2002:8(1):49-78.