SUVANNABHUMI (수완나부미)

Korea Institute for ASEAN Studies (부산외대 아세안연구원)
권호 표지

Southeast Asia as Theoretical Laboratory for the World

  • Received : 2018.05.04
  • Accepted : 2018.11.25
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Area studies are sometimes framed as focused on specific localities, rooted in deep linguistic, cultural and historical knowledge, and hence empirically rich but, as a result, as yielding non-transferable/non-translatable findings and hence as theoretically poor. In Europe and North America some social science disciplines like sociology, economics and political science routinely dismiss any reference to local specifics as parochial "noise" interfering with their universalizing pretensions which in reality obscure their own Euro-American parochialism. For more qualitatively oriented disciplines like history, anthropology and cultural studies the inherent non-universality of (geographically constricted) area studies presents a predicament which is increasingly fought out by resorting to philosophical concepts which usually have a Eurocentric pedigree. In this paper, however, I argue that concepts with arguably European pedigree - like religion, culture, identity, heritage and art - travel around the world and are adopted through vernacular discourses that are specific to locally inflected histories and cultural contexts by annexing existing vocabularies as linguistic vehicles. In the process, these vernacularized "universal" concepts acquire different meanings or connotations, and can be used as powerful devices in local discursive fields. The study of these processes offer at once a powerful antidote against simplistic notions of "global"/"universal" and "local," and a potential corrective to localizing parochialism and blindly Eurocentric universalism. I develop this substantive argument with reference to my own professional, disciplinary and theoretical trajectory as an anthropologist and historian focusing on Vietnam, who used that experience - and the empirical puzzles and wonder encountered - in order to develop theoretical interests and questions that became the basis for larger-scale, comparative research projects in Japan, China, India, South Africa, Brazil and Europe. The subsequent challenge is to bring the results of such larger, comparative research "home" to Vietnam in a meaningful way, and thus overcome the limitations of both area studies and Eurocentric disciplines.

Keywords

References

  1. Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  2. Asad, Talad. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  3. Asad, Talad. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005. The Political Field, the Social Science Field, and the Journalistic Field. Rodney Benson and Erik Neveu, eds. 29-47. Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  6. Casanova, Jose. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  8. Fardon, Richard, ed. 1990. Localizing Strategies. Regional Traditions of Ethnographic Writing. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
  9. Fillitz, Thomas and A. Jamie Saris, eds. 2013. Debating Authenticity: Concepts of modernity in anthropological perspective. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.
  10. Gupta, Akhil and James Ferguson, eds. 1997. Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Groundsof a Field Science. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
  11. Hefner, Robert. 1998. Multiple Modernities: Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism in a Globalizing Age. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27: 83-104.
  12. Herzfeld, Michael. (2004). The Body Impolitic: Artisans and Artifice in the Global Hierarchy of Value. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  13. Katzenstein, Peter J. and Timothy A. Byrnes. 2006, Transnational Religion in an Expanding Europe, Perspectives on Politics, 4(4): 679-694.
  14. Kipnis, Andrew. 2001. The Flourishing of Religion in Post-Mao China and the Anthropological Category of Religion. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 12(1): 32-46.
  15. Lee, Raymond. 1993. The Globalization of Religious Markets: International Innovations, Malaysian Consumption. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia. 8(1), 1993: 35-61.
  16. Lowenthal, David. 1998, or. 1996. The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Hitchcock, Michael, Victor T. King and Michael Parnwell, eds. 2010. Heritage Tourism in Southeast Asia. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
  18. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara. 1998. Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums, and Heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  19. Le Hong Ly, Dao The Duc, Nguyen Thi Hien, Hoang Cam, Nguyen Chi Ben. 2012. Bao ton va phat huy di san van hoa trong qua trinh hien dai hoa [Safeguarding and Promoting Cultural Heritage against the Backdrop of Modernization]: Nghien cuu truong hop tin nguong tho cung Hung Vuong (Phu Tho), hoi Giong (Ha Noi), thap Ba Poh Nagar (Khanh Hoa) va van hoa cong chieng cua nguoi Lach (Lam Dong). Hanoi: UNESCO (unpublished report).
  20. Le Hong Ly and Nguyen Thi Phương Cham, eds. 2014. Di san van hoa tron xaa hoi Viet Nam duong dai [Cultural heritage in contemporary Vietnamese society]. Ha Noi: NXB Tri Thuc.
  21. Marcus, George. 1995. Ethnography in/of the World System: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24: 95-117.
  22. Meskell, Lynn. 2013. UNESCO's World Heritage Convention at 40: Challenging the Economic and Political Order of International Heritage Conservation. Current Anthropology, 54(4): 483-494.
  23. Meyer, Birgit and Marleen de Witte, eds. 2013. Heritage and the Sacred. Special issue of Material Religion: The Journal of Objects, Art and Belief, 9(3): 274-404.
  24. Paine, Crispin. 2013. Religious Objects in Museums: Private Lives and Public Duties. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
  25. Salemink, Oscar, ed. 2001. Viet Nam's Cultural Diversity:Approaches to Preservation. Paris: UNESCO Publishing (Memory of Peoples). In French: Diversite culturelle au Viet Nam: enjeux multiples, approches plurielles. Paris: Editions UNESCO (Memoire des peuples) ; In Vietnamese: Tinh da dang cua Van hoa Viet Nam: Nhung tiep can ve su bao ton [Viet Nam's Cultural Diversity: Approaches to Preservation]. Hanoi (2002): UNESCO/Trung tam Khoa hoc Xa hoi va Nhan van Quoc gia.
  26. Salemink, Oscar, ed. 2003a. The Ethnography of Vietnam's Central Highlanders: A Historical Contextualization, 1850-1990. London: RoutledgeCurzon / Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press [Anthropology of Asia Series].
  27. Salemink, Oscar, ed. 2003b. "Enclosing the Highlands: Socialist, Capitalist and Protestant Conversions of Vietnam's Central Highlanders", RCSD Conference "The Politics of the Commons" (co-hosted by IASCP), Chiang Mai University, 11-14 July 2003, see the paper, http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/1787/Oscar_Salemink_RCSD_paper.pdf.
  28. Salemink, Oscar, ed. 2004. Development cooperation as quasi-religious conversion. Oscar Salemink, Anton van Harskamp, Ananta Kumar Giri, eds. 121-130. The Development of Religion, the Religion of Development. Delft: Eburon.
  29. Salemink, Oscar, ed. 2007a, The Emperor's new clothes: Re-fashioning ritual in the Huế Festival. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 38(3): 559-582.
  30. Salemink, Oscar, ed. 2007b. Spirits of Consumption and the Capitalist Ethic in Vietnam. Pattana Kitiarsa, ed. 147-168. Religious Commodifications in Asia: Marketing Gods. London and New York: Routledge.
  31. Salemink, Oscar, ed. 2013. Appropriating Culture: The politics of intangible cultural heritage in Vietnam. Mark Sidel and Hue-Tam Ho Tai, eds. 158-180. State, Society and the Market in Contemporary Vietnam: Property, Power and Values. New York and London: Routledge.
  32. Salemink, Oscar, ed. 2015. Revolutionary and Christian Ecumenes and Desire for Modernity in the Vietnamese Highlands. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 16(4): 388-409.
  33. Salemink, Oscar, ed. 2016. Described, inscribed, written off: Heritagization as (dis)connection. Philip Taylor, ed. 311-345. Connected and Disconnected in Vietnam. Canberra: Australian National University Press Australian National University Press (open access http://press.anu.edu.au/?p=337653).
  34. Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 2002. North Atlantic Universals: Analytical fictions, 1492-1945. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(4): 839-858.
  35. Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 2003. Global Transformations: Anthropology and the Modern World. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  36. Turner, Bryan S. 2004. Fundamentalism, Spiritual Markets and Modernity. Sociology, 38(1): 195-202.
  37. Turner, Bryan S. 2006a. Religion and Politics: Nationalism, globalisation and empire. Asian Journal of Social Sciences, 34(2): 209-224.
  38. Turner, Bryan S. 2006b. Religion, Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2-3): 437-455.
  39. Turner, Bryan S. and Oscar Salemink, eds. 2015. Routledge Handbook of Religions in Asia. London and New York: Routledge.
  40. Van der Veer, Peter, ed. 1996. Conversion to Modernities: The globalization of Christianity. London and New York: Routledge.