SUVANNABHUMI (수완나부미)

Korea Institute for ASEAN Studies (부산외대 아세안연구원)
권호 표지

Southeast Asian Studies in the Age of STEM Education and Hyper-utilitarianism

  • Received : 2018.05.11
  • Accepted : 2018.11.25
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Area studies, including Asian and Southeast Asian studies, in the post-Cold War era have been facing an epochal challenge that is rooted in two conditions: on the one hand, the end of the Cold War and the fading geopolitical rationale, and on the other, the emergence of the technology-driven transformation of the global economy and society. The consequences thus far are paradoxical: 1) While the technology-led transformation needs a workforce with critical and innovative abilities, higher education becomes more hyper-utilitarian; 2) While the transformation instigates increasing diversity of identities in global cultures, many countries thrive for STEM education at the expense of learning languages and cultures, including area studies which are essential for diversity. Southeast Asian studies programs need to change in response to these new conditions. These changing conditions and paradoxes, nevertheless, take different forms and degrees in the American, European and Asian academies, thanks to their different histories of higher education. The prospects for Southeast Asian Studies in these various academies are likely to be different too.

Keywords

References

  1. Alatas, Syed Farid. 2003. Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labour in the Social Sciences. Current Sociology, 51(6): 599-613.
  2. Altbach, Philip G. and Jorge Balan. 2007. World Class Worldwide: Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  3. Cheah, Pheng. 2001. Universal Areas: Asian Studies in a World in Motion. Traces, 1(1): 37-70.
  4. Goh Beng Lan, ed. 2011. Decentring and Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies: Perspectives from the Region. Singapore: ISEAS Press.
  5. Hau, Caroline, ed. 2013. Southeast Asian Studies: Crisis or Opportunity? Newsletter. Kyoto: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University, no. 68.
  6. Hirschman, Charles, Charles Keyes, and Karl Hutterer, eds. 1992. Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Asian Studies.
  7. Joen Je Seong. 2011. Historical Dynamics of Southeast Asian Studies in Korea. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, special issues on Southeast Asian Studies in Korea, issue 11, March.
  8. Kondo, Dorrines. 2001. (Un)Disciplined Subjects: (De)Colonizing the Academy. Orientations: Mapping Studies in the Asian Diaspora. Kandice Chuh and Karen Shimakawa, eds. 25-44. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
  9. Kratoska, Paul, Remco Raben, and Henk Schulte Nordholt, eds. 2005. Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space. Singapore: NUS Press and Athens: Ohio University Press.
  10. Lim, David. 2001. Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
  11. McVey, Ruth. 1998. Globalization, Marginalization, and the Study of Southeast Asia. Craig J. Reynolds and Ruthe McVey, eds. Southeast Asian Studies: Reorientations. The Frank H. Golay Memorial Lectures 2 and 3. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.
  12. Miyoshi, Masao and Harry Harootunian, eds. 2002. Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
  13. Rafael, Vicente. 1999. Regionalism, Area Studies and the Accidents of Agency. American Historical Review, 104(4): 1208-1220.
  14. Rafael, Vicente. ed. 1995. Discrepant Histories: Translocal Essays on Filipino Cultures. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  15. Reid, Anthony, ed. 2004. Southeast Asian Studies for the Twenty first Century. Tempe: Arizona State University.
  16. Schwab, Klaus. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
  17. Sears, Laurie J, ed. 2007. Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  18. Social Science Research Council (SSRC). 1999. Weighing the Balance: Southeast Asian Studies Ten Years After. New York: SSRC.
  19. Steinhoff, Patricia. 1996. Japanese Studies in the United States: The 1990s. Tokyo: Japan Foundation.
  20. Steinhoff, Patricia. 2007. Japanese Studies in the United States and Canada: Continuities and Opportunities. Tokyo: Japan Foundation.
  21. Sutherland, Heather. 2005. Contingent Devices. Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space. Paul Kratoska, Remco Raben and Henk Schulte Nordholt, eds. 20-59. Singapore, NUS Press and Athens: Ohio University Press.
  22. Task Force on Higher Education and Society. 2000. Higher Education in Developing Countries: Peril and Promise. Washington, D.C.: World Bank