DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Tools to Prioritize Construction Phase Sustainability Actions (CPSAs) and to Measure CPSAs Implementation

  • O'Connor, James T. (The University of Texas at Austin) ;
  • Torres, Neftali (Fluor Corporation) ;
  • Kralik, Nancy (HSE & Sustainability, Fluor Corporation) ;
  • Woo, Jeyoung (The University of Texas at Austin)
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

Achieving sustainability targets on construction projects has increasingly become one of the prime strategies for construction organizations. To provide more detailed guidance on sustainability implementation on projects, Construction Industry Institute (CII) Research Team (RT) 304 developed a catalog of the Construction Phase Sustainability Actions (CPSAs). The primary objective of this paper was the development of two support tools, the CPSA Screening Tool and the CPSA Implementation Index, that could be used to enable efficient application of CPSAs, support sustainability-related decisions, and measure CPSA implementation and performance. The authors developed the tools in four stages: conceptual, detailed planning, tool programming, and testing. The tools were then demonstrated on a capital project to confirm their efficacy and applicability. This paper presents the background, inputs and outputs, and the algorithms of each tool. The CPSA Screening Tool can prioritize the CPSAs most relevant to a project; the CPSA Implementation Index enables continuous monitoring of implementation levels.

Keywords

E1GAAO_2018_v8n1_22_f0001.png 이미지

FIGURE I Screenshot of “Sustainability Objective Prioritization” Tab

E1GAAO_2018_v8n1_22_f0002.png 이미지

FIGURE II Partial Screenshot of “Project Conditions” Tab

E1GAAO_2018_v8n1_22_f0003.png 이미지

FIGURE III Partial Screenshot of “CPSA Screening Results” TabC. Tool Inputs and Outputs

E1GAAO_2018_v8n1_22_f0004.png 이미지

FIGURE IV Process of CPSA Screening Tool

E1GAAO_2018_v8n1_22_f0005.png 이미지

FIGURE V Partial Screenshot of “CPSA Implementation Effort Checklist” Tab

E1GAAO_2018_v8n1_22_f0006.png 이미지

FIGURE VI Categories of Output Metrics

E1GAAO_2018_v8n1_22_f0007.png 이미지

FIGURE VII Current Level of CPSA Implementation Index (72.53 percent)

TABLE I SIR scale

E1GAAO_2018_v8n1_22_t0001.png 이미지

TABLE II The linear scoring model of the Conditions Score

E1GAAO_2018_v8n1_22_t0002.png 이미지

TABLE III Construction Sustainability Output Metrics

E1GAAO_2018_v8n1_22_t0003.png 이미지

TABLE IV Scoring points for CPSA Implementation Index

E1GAAO_2018_v8n1_22_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. J.T. O'Connor, M.F. Blackhurst, N. Torres, and J. Woo, "Study of Sustainability Opportunity during Construction." Research Report No. 304-11, Construction Industry Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2014.
  2. J.T. O'Connor, N. Torres, and J. Woo, "Sustainability Actions during the Construction Phase." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 142, no. 7, pp. 04016016, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001128
  3. Y.H. Ahn, A.R. Pearce, Y. Wang, and G. Wang, "Drivers and barriers of sustainable design and construction: The perception of green building experience." International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 35-45, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/2093761X.2012.759887
  4. J. Park and Y.H. Ahn, "Development of a green road rating system for South Korea." International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 249-263, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/2093761X.2015.1117404
  5. T.R. Naik, "Sustainability of Concrete Construction." Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 98-103, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:2(98)
  6. M. Waris, M. Shahir Liew, M. Faris Khamidi, and A. Idrus, "Criteria for the selection of sustainable onsite construction equipment" International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 96-110, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.06.002
  7. W.K. Biswas, "Carbon footprint and embodied energy consumption assessment of building construction works in Western Australia." International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 179-186, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.11.004
  8. K. Parrish and M. Chester, "Life-Cycle Assessment for Construction of Sustainable Infrastructure." Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 89-94, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000187
  9. F. Rodriguez Lopez and G. Fernandez Sanchez, "Challenges for Sustainability Assessment by Indicators." Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 321-325, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000142
  10. H. Said and L. Berger, "Future Trends of Sustainability Design and Analysis in Construction Industry and Academia." Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 77-88, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000181
  11. A. Umer, K. Hewage, H. Haider, and R. Sadiq, "Sustainability assessment of roadway projects under uncertainty using Green Proforma: An index-based approach." International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 604-619, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.06.002
  12. B. Willard, "The New Sustainability Advantage: Seven Business Case Benefits of a Triple Bottom Line." New Society Publishers, British Columbia, Canada, 2012.
  13. W.M. Adams, "The Future of Sustainability: Re-thinking Environment and Development in the Twenty-first Century." Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29-31 January 206, Gland, Switzerland, 2006.
  14. M.S. Cato, "Green Economics: An Introduction to Theory, Policy and Practice." Earthscan, London, UK, 2009.
  15. The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), "About LEED" http://www.usgbc.org/articles/about-leed, 2017.
  16. Y. Alhorr, E. Eliskandarani, and E. Elsarrag, "Approaches to reducing carbon dioxide emissions in the built environment: Low carbon cities." International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, vol. 3, pp. 167-178, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.11.003
  17. J.K. Yates, "Sustainable Industrial Construction" Research Report No.250-11, Construction Industry Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2008.
  18. C. Goh and S. Rowlinson, "Conceptual Maturity Model for Sustainable Construction." Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 191-195, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000129
  19. L. Shen, Y. Wu, and X. Zhang, "Key Assessment Indicators for the Sustainability of Infrastructure Projects." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 441-451, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000315