DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

독일 성과감독프로그램을 통한 하천생태복원 사후평가방안 연구 - 유럽물관리지침(WRRL)에 따른 하천관리 사례를 중심으로

A study on application for ecological restoration management through an implementation of "Erfolgskontrolle" - Focused on river management according to WRRL in Germany

  • 이지영 (충남대학교 농업과학연구소) ;
  • 최재용 (충남대학교 산림자원학과)
  • Lee, Ji-Young (Institute of Agricultural Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Jae-Yong (Department of Environment & Forest Resources, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.12
  • 심사 : 2018.11.20
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31

초록

In Germany has a long history of ecological restoration and restoration management. At the beginning of the 1990s, the "Erfolgskontrolle" was used as an evaluation program after the restoration project and many exchanges of views took place. It is the time, in Korea, there is a need for a comprehensive evaluation program after the restoration project, as there is no evaluation method yet. At this time it may be the "Erfolgskontrolle" in Germany as a practical model for the Korean restoration management program. The purpose of this study is to identify the concept and character of the "Erfolgskontrolle" and to demonstrate the implication and potential of application, through the analysis of the implementation example of the revaluation of river revitalization. To achieve the goal was carried out theoretical and 3 exemplary revitalization research cases. And it was endeavored to deliver the German way of acting and the basic idea to Korea. For the restoration, the "precautionary principle" should be considered first, the upper legal regulation should not be violated. In order to apply "Erfolgskontrolle" in practice, the goal formulation should be clear and systematically evaluated. And through the collection of typified cases, the comprehensive and unified theory should be established, it is possible, thus the qualitative assessment of the restoration project.

키워드

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_83_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Relationship structure of the analysis and work steps of an efficient revitalization planning

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_83_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. The contents applied to Mühlenbach (Umweltbüro Schwahn. 2010)

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_83_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. The contents applied to Mumme (Umweltbüro Schwahn. 2010)

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_83_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. The contents applied to Dübel(UmweltbüroSchwahn. 2010)

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_83_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 5. Investigation design of “Erfolgskontrolle”

Table 1. The compared system in “Erfogskontrolle”

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_83_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Synthesis of case analysis

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_83_t0002.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Amt fur Landwirtschaft und Natur des Kantons Bern. 2011. Erfolgskontrolle im Naturschutz und okologischen Ausgleich Rahmenkonzept.
  2. An JH.Lim CH.Lim YK.Nam KB and Lee CS. 2014. A Review of Restoration Project Evaluation and Post Management for Evological Restoration of the River. Journal of Restoration Ecology 4(1): 15-34. (in Korean with English summary)
  3. Aronson J.Floret C.Le Floc'h E.Ovalle C and Pontanier R. 1993. Restoration and Rehabilitation of Degraded Ecosystems in Arid and Semi-Arid Lands. I. A View from the South. Restoration Ecology 1: 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1993.tb00004.x
  4. Blab J.Schroder E and Volkl W. 1994. Effizienzkontrollen im Naturschutz. Bonn : Kilda-Verlag.
  5. DWA(Deutsche Vereinigung fur Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser un Abfall e.V.). 2009. Merkblatt DWA- M 610 - Neue Wege der Gewasserunterhaltung-Pflege und Entwicklung kleiner Fliessgewasser.
  6. Europaische Union. 2000. Richtlinie 2000/60/EG des Europaischen Parlamentes und des Rates vom 23. Oktober 2000 zur Schaffung eines Ordnungsrahmens fur Ma$\ss$nahmen der Gemeinschaft im Bereich der Wasserpolitik.
  7. Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg Finanzbehorde. 2001. Leitfaden fur Erfolgskontrollen- Hinweise fur die Verwaltung der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg
  8. Jessel B and Tobias K. 2002. Okologisch orientierte Planung. Stuttgart : Ulmer.
  9. Matthias B. 2008. Furte und Kolke in Fliessgewassern: Morphologie, Habitatfunktion und Massnahmenplanung.- Manuscript fur den LANU Jahresbericht 2007/2008.
  10. Mengiardi J and Coch T. 2006. Rahmenkonzept Teil III : Konzeption der okologischen Erfolgskontrolle. A Konzept Bericht im Auftrag des Regierungsprasidiums Freiburg.
  11. Ministry of Environment. 2014. Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources. (in Korean)
  12. Ministry of Environment. 2016. Ecological river restoration mid-term comprehensive plan. (in Korean)
  13. Oberrheinagentur. 1996. Integriertes Rheinprogramm-Rahmenkomzept des Landes Baden-Wurttembergzur Umsetzung des Integrierten Rheinprogramms.
  14. Reinigungsprasidium Freiburg. 2015. Okologische Erfolgskontrolle Integriertes Rheinprogramm: Rahmenkonzept Teil III.
  15. Schaumburg J.Schranz C.Stelzer D.Hofmann G.Gutowski A and Foerster J. 2006. Handlungsanweisung fur die okologische Bewertung von Fliessgewassern zur Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie: Makrophyten und Phytobenthos.
  16. UBA(Umweltbundesamt). 2004. Grundlagen fur die Auswahl der kosteneffizientesten Massnahmenkombinationen zur Aufnahme in das Massnahmenprogramm nach Artikel 11 der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie.
  17. Umweltburo Schwahn. 2010. biologische Erfolgskontrollen durchgefuhrter Massnahmen in Fliessgewassern.
  18. http://www.fliessgewaesserbewertung.de/