Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validity and Reliability of a Korean version of the Nursing Students' Perception of Instructor Caring (K-NSPIC)

간호대학생이 지각한 임상실습현장지도자의 돌봄에 대한 한국어판 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도 분석

  • Lee, Shinae (Graduate School, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Park, Hyojung (College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Ewha Research Institute of Nursing Science)
  • 이신애 (이화여자대학교 일반대학원) ;
  • 박효정 (이화여자대학교 간호대학, 이화간호과학연구소)
  • Received : 2018.08.16
  • Accepted : 2018.12.07
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the nursing students' perception of instructor caring (NSPIC) scale developed by Wade and Kasper for nursing students. We collected data from 219 nursing students in the 3rd to 4th year at three nursing colleges from June 4 to June 20, 2018. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 and AMOS 21.0. An exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation was performed, resulting in five factors (respectful sharing, confidence through caring, control versus flexibility, supportive learning climate, appreciation of life's meanings) with a total of 27 items. Confirmatory factor analysis supported good convergent and discriminant validities. In addition, the concurrent validity test confirmed that the K-NSPIC scale was a validity tool as the correlation of the clinical learning environment (CLE) scale appeared as r=.64 (p<.001). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the K-NSPIC was .88, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient for each of the five factors was .91, .86, .80, .76, and .85; internal consistency was confirmed. It is significant that the K-NSPIC proved applicable as a useful tool for assessing instructor caring. It is also expected that it will assist in the design of programs to improve the caring ability of instructors.

본 연구는 국내 간호대학생을 대상으로 Wade와 Kasper가 개발한 임상실습현장지도자의 돌봄에 대한 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도를 검증하기 위하여 시행되었다. D 광역시 3개 대학교 간호학과 3~4학년에 재학 중인 간호대학생 219명을 대상으로 2018년 6월 04일에서 6월 20일까지 자료 수집을 하였다. 자료 분석은 SPSS 21.0과 AMOS 21.0 프로그램을 활용하여 타당도와 신뢰도 검증을 실시하였다. varimax 직각 회전을 이용한 탐색적 요인분석을 시행한 결과, 총 27문항 5개 확인되었으며 존중하는 배려, 돌봄을 통한 신뢰, 통제와 유연성, 지지적인 교육환경, 삶의 의미에 대한 공감으로 구분되었다. 동시타당도 검정 결과, 임상실습교육환경 측정도구의 상관관계에서 r=.64 (p<.001)로 나타나 타당도가 있는 도구임이 확인되었다. 최종 도구의 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$는 .88이었고, 각 요인별 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$는 .91, .86, .80, .76, .85로 나타나 신뢰도가 높음을 확인하였다. 본 연구에서 검증된 한국어판 NSPIC 도구는 임상실습현장지도자의 돌봄 역량을 객관적으로 평가하기에 유용한 도구로서 적용가능성을 제시하였다는 것에 의의가 있다. 또한 본 연구는 임상실습현장지도자의 돌봄 역량을 향상시키기 위한 프로그램을 개발하는 데 도움을 줄 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n12_218_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Confirmatory factor analysis of the K-NSPIC Note. RS= Respectful Sharing; CTC= Confidence Through Caring; CVF= Control Versus Flexibility; SLC=Supportive Learning Climate; ALM= Appreciation of Life's Meaning

Table 1. General characteristics of subject

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n12_218_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Exploratory factor analysis of the K-NSPIC

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n12_218_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Correlation among Factors of K-NSPIC and CLE

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n12_218_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Reliability: Cronbach's alpha values for K-NSPIC and its subscale

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n12_218_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. J. Han, "Nursing students' perceptions of clinical learning environment (CLE)". Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 2595-2607, 2010.
  2. R. Nazari, E. Mohammadi, "Characteristics of competent clinical instructors: A review of the experiences of nursing students and instructor", Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 11-22, 2015. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7508/jnms.2015.02.002
  3. I. Mansutti, L. Saiani, L. Grassetti, A. Palese, "Instruments evaluating the quality of the clinical learning environment in nursing education: A systematic review of psychometric properties", International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 68, pp. 60-72, 2017. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.001
  4. M. S. Chung, J. S. Park, E. Ryu, G. Shin, H. Y. Jun, B. J. Kim, "Teaching effectiveness and adequacy of practical training in nursing students", The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 550-560, 2015. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.4.550
  5. A. Boykin, S. O. Schoenhofer, Nursing as caring: A model for transforming practice. pp. 1-16. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2001.
  6. J. Watson, Assessing and measuring caring in nursing and health sciences. 2nd ed. p. 3-23, New York Springer Publishing, 2009.
  7. J. Longo, "Acts of caring: Nurses caring for nurses", Holistic Nursing Practice, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 8-16, 2011. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0b013e3181fe2627
  8. J. M. Morse, J. Bottorff, W. Neander, S. Solberg, "Comparative analysis of conceptualizations and theories of caring", Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 119-126. 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1991.tb00655.x
  9. M. R. Lee, M. J. Kim, "The influences of college adaptation, satisfaction of major and clinical practice on vocational identity in nursing students", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 197-208, 2018. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.6.197
  10. S. H. Kim, S. Y. Yoo, Y. Y. Kim, "Validity and reliability of the Korean version scale of the clinical learning enviroment, supervision and nurse teacher evaluation (CLES+T)", Journal of Korean Academy Nursing, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 70-83, 2018. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2018.48.1.70
  11. L. J. Labrague, D. M. McEnroe-Petitte, I. V. Papathanasiou, O. B. Edet, J. Arulappan, "Impact of instructors' caring on students' perceptions of their own caring behaviors", Journal of Nursing Scholarship, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 338-346, 2015. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12139
  12. C. P. Lovecchio, M. J. K. DiMattio, S. Hudacek, "Predictors of undergraduate nursing student satisfaction with clinical learning environment: A secondary analysis", Nursing Education Perspectives, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 252-254, 2015. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5480/13-1266
  13. I. H. Park, Y. O. Suh, "Development of teaching efficacy scale to evaluate clinical nursing instructors", Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 18-29, 2018. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2018.30.1.18
  14. S. J. Hong, E. H. Kim, "Effects of preceptorship on nursing and caring concepts measured in nursing students' clinical competency, stress of clinical practice, and practice satisfaction in clinical practice", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 6204-6214, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.10.6204
  15. G. H. Wade, N. Kasper, "Nursing students' perceptions of instructor caring: an instrument based on Watson's theory of transpersonal caring", Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 162-168, 2006.
  16. J. Li, L. Zhou, D. Zhu, C. Hu, X. Zhang, Y. Xu, "Chinese version of the nursing students' perception of instructor caring (C-NSPIC): Assessment of reliability and validity", Nurse Education Today, vol. 33, pp. 1482-1489, 2013. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.017
  17. C. Arrigoni, M. Puci, A. M. Grugnetti, L. Collivasone, E. Fenizia, P. Borrelli, et al., "Italian version of Nursing Students' Perception of Instructor Caring (I-NSPIC): Assessment of reliability and validity", BMC Medical Education, vol. 17, pp. 218, 2017. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1032-y
  18. A. L. Comrey, H. B. Lee, A first course in factor analysis. 2nd ed. p. 217, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
  19. R. F. DeVellis, Scale development: theory and application. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California, SAGE Publications, 2012.
  20. S. V. Dunn, P. Burnett, "The development of a clinical learning environment scale", Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1166-1173, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb03119.x
  21. World Health Organization. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments [Internet]. Geneva : WHO. Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/ (accessed July, 02, 2018)
  22. J. P. Woo, "Concept and understanding of structural equation model (Amos 4.0-20.0)", Hanarae, 2012.
  23. C, Vandenhouten, S, Kubsch, M, Peterson, J, Murdock, L, Lehrer, "Watson's theory of transpersonal caring: Factors impacting nurses professional caring", Holistic Nursing Practice, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 326-334, 2012. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0b013e31826ed0e8
  24. M. Tomietto, L. Saiani, A. Palese, L. Cunico, G. Cicoloni, P. Watson, et al., "Clinical learning environment and supervision plus nurse teacher (CLES+T) scale: testing the psychometric characteristics of the Italian version", Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. B72-B80, 2012.
  25. H. A. Park, "Theory: Problems and issues in developing measurement scales in nursing", Journal of Nursing Query, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 46-72, 2005.
  26. D. Iacobucci, A. Duhachek, "Advancing alpha: Measuring reliability with confidence", Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 478-487, 2003. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_14
  27. D. L. Streiner, G. R. Norman, J. Cairney. "Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use", 5th ed. p. 33-37, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.