Fig. 1 Dimension of slab type specimen.
Fig. 2 Ti-Ribbon and Ti-Mesh anode grouted by mortar.
Fig. 3 Installation of 3 types of anode in RC specimens.
Fig. 4 Picture of cathodic protection test on the RC specimens.
Fig. 5 Schematic diagram of slab type specimen installed anode and reference electrodes for cathodic protection.
Fig. 6 The variation of cathodic protection potential in different anodes and experimental environments.
Fig. 7 Potential shift variation of RC specimen applied with a Ti-Ribbon anode.
Fig. 8 Potential shift variation of the RC specimen applied with a Ti-Ribbon anode and a Ti-Rod anode.
Fig. 9 Potential shift variation of the RC specimen applied with a Ti-Ribbon anode and a Ti-Mesh anode.
Table 1 Detail contents of the reinforced concrete specimen
References
- K. Subbiah, S. Velu, S. -J. Kwon, H. -S. Lee, N. Rethinam, and D.-J. Park, Electrochim. Acta, 259, 1129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.088
- F. J. Luna Molina, M. C. Alonso Alonso, M. Sanchez Moreno, and R. Jarabo Centenero, Constr. Build. Mater., 156, 468 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.002
- M. Cabrini, S. Lorenzi, T. Pastore, and S. Pellegrini, Corros. Sci. Tech., 17, 203 (2018).
- Moe M. S. Cheung and C. Cao, Constr. Build. Mater., 45, 199 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.010
- T. J. Kim, K. A. Kim, J. Y. Lee, and H. J. Jang, Corros. Sci. Tech., 17, 225 (2018).
- B. Sanz, J. Planas, and Jose M. Sancho, Constr. Build. Mater., 160, 598 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.093
- G. T. Parthiban, T. Parthiban, R. Ravi, V. Saraswathy, N. Palaniswamy, and V. Sivan, Corros. Sci., 50, 3329 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.08.040
- S. H. Xing, Y. Li, H. Q. Song, Y. G. Yan, and M. X. Sun, Ocean Eng., 113, 144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.047
- E. Redaelli, F. Lollini, and L. Bertolini, Constr. Build. Mater., 39, 95 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.014
- Ph. Refait, M. Jeannin, R. Sabot, H. Antony, and S. Pineau, Corros. Sci. 90, 375 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.10.035
- C. Christodoulou, G. Glass, J. Webb, S. Austin, and C. Goodier, Corros. Sci., 52, 2671 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2010.04.018
- G. Qiao, B. Guo, J. Ou, F. Xu, and Z. Li, Constr. Build. Mater., 119, 260 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.012
- X. Xi and S. Yang, Constr. Build. Mater., 155, 114 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.051
- K. Wilson, M. Jawed, amd V. Ngala, Constr. Build. Mater., 39, 19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.037
- B. Zhou, X. Gu, H. Guo, W. Zhang, Q. Huang, Constr. Build. Mater., 164, 877 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.187
- J. Carmona Calero, M.A. Climent Llorca, and P. Garces Terradillos, J. Electroanal. Chem., 793, 8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.08.029
- L. Bertolini and E. Redaelli, Corros. Sci., 51, 2218 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2009.06.012
- L. Bertolini, M. Gastaldi, M. Pedeferri, and E. Redaelli, Corros. Sci., 44, 1497 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(01)00168-8
- P. V. Bahekar and S. S. Gadve, Constr. Build. Mater., 156, 242 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.145
- M. S. Anwar, B. Sujitha, and R. Vedalakshmi, Constr. Build. Mater., 71, 167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.032
- J-h Zhu, M-n Su, J-y Huang, T. Ueda, and F. Xing, Constr. Build.Mater., 167, 669, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.096
- J. Xu and W. Yao, Constr. Build. Mater., 23, 2220 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.002