구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제34권1호
  • /
  • Pages.32-38
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

좁은 직경 임플란트 3년간의 생존율에 관한 후향적 연구

A 3 year prospective study of survival rate of narrow diameter implants

  • 이성조 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정세영 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 신현승 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 박정철 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 송영균 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 조인우 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Lee, Sung-Jo (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Jung, Sae-Young (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Shin, Hyun-Seung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Park, Jung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Song, Young-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, In-Woo (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2017.11.24
  • 심사 : 2018.01.02
  • 발행 : 2018.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 3.6 mm 이하 좁은 직경 임플란트의 일정 기간 생존율을 초기고정 값과 방사선학적 계측을 통해 분석해보고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 24명의 환자에 식립된 직경 3.6 mm 이하, 길이 7 mm 이상의 38개의 임플란트를 조사하였다. 식립된 임플란트의 platform 직경, body 직경, 길이, 식립 부위 등을 확인하였고 식립 시 골유도재생술의 동반 시행 여부, 완성된 보철의 형태를 확인하였다. 초기고정 값은 임플란트 식립 직후 측정한 implant stability quotient (ISQ) 값을 확인하였고, 방사선 사진을 통해 식립된 임플란트의 근 원심 marginal bone level (MBL)을 측정하였다. 결과: 전체 임플란트의 생존율은 92.11% 이었고 ISQ값은 평균 66.26으로 나타났다. 생존한 임플란트의 MBL 변화는 평균 $0.14{\pm}0.31mm$를 나타내었다. Platform 직경이 body 직경보다 큰 임플란트 중 실패한 임플란트는 없었다. 결론: 좁은 직경의 임플란트는 좁은 직경의 치조제에 안정적인 치료 결과를 나타낸다 사료된다.

Purpose: The purpose of present study was to retrospectively analyze the survival rate of narrow diameter implant less than 3.6 mm by initial stability and radiographic measurements. Materials and Methods: In total, 24 patients who received 38 narrow diameter implants (${\leq}3.6mm$ in diameter, ${\geq}7mm$ in length) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The cumulative survival rate was calculated and various factors were investigated according to the implant platform diameter, body diameter, length, position, concomitant use of guided bone regeneration in implant placement and final prosthesis type. Initial stability was investigated with implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. The mesial and distal marginal bone level (MBL) change was calculated with radiography. Results: The overall survival rate was 92.11%. Mean ISQ value and MBL change of survival implants was 66.26 and $0.14{\pm}0.31mm$, respectively. None of the implants with platform diameters larger than the body diameter failed. Conclusion: In conclusion, the findings of present study suggest that narrow diameter implant could be predictable treatment in narrow alveolar ridge.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jung RE, Fenner N, Hammerle CH, Zitzmann NU. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:1065-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02522.x
  2. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20 Suppl 4:113-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01781.x
  3. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Longterm evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  4. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:631-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01209.x
  5. Klein MO, Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B. Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29 Suppl:43-54.
  6. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu JF, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Small-diameter implants: indications and contraindications. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:186-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00221.x
  7. Quek CE, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue performance of a single-tooth implant abutment system: effect of diameter. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:929-36.
  8. Osman RB, Swain MV. A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia. Materials (Basel) 2015;8:932-58. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8030932
  9. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:391-401.
  10. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Romanos G, Tarnow D. Clinical recommendations for avoiding and managing surgical complications associated with implant dentistry: a review. J Periodontol 2008;79:1317-29. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070067
  11. Natali AN, Carniel EL, Pavan PG. Investigation of viscoelastoplastic response of bone tissue in oral implants press fit process. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;91:868-75.
  12. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  13. Konstantinovic VS, Ivanjac F, Lazic V, Djordjevic I. Assessment of implant stability by resonant frequency analysis. Vojnosanit Pregl 2015;72:169-74. https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP130801063K
  14. Suzuki S, Kobayashi H, Ogawa T. Implant stability change and osseointegration speed of immediately loaded photofunctionalized implants. Implant Dent 2013;22:481-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31829deb62
  15. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x
  16. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Dula K, Lang NP. Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:153-61.
  17. Zinsli B, Sagesser T, Mericske E, Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter ITI implants: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:92-9.
  18. Romeo E, Lops D, Amorfini L, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, Vogel G. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of small-diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: a longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:139-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01191.x
  19. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis; Mosby; 2008. p. 1120.
  20. Yuodelis RA, Weaver JD, Sapkos S. Facial and lingual contours of artificial complete crown restorations and their effects on the periodontium. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:61-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90140-6
  21. Reeves WG. Restorative margin placement and periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:733-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90405-L
  22. Shemtov-Yona K, Rittel D, Machtei EE, Levin L. Effect of dental implant diameter on fatigue performance. Part II: failure analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:178-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00476.x
  23. Arisan V, Bolukbasi N, Ersanli S, Ozdemir T. Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:296-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01840.x
  24. Romeo E, Lops D, Margutti E, Ghisolfi M, Chiapasco M, Vogel G. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:247-59.
  25. Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000 1998;17:63-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00124.x