DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the difference between teaching & learning satisfaction and achievement of students financially supported and not supported by university

  • Park, Young-Sool (Department of Health Care Management, Catholic Kwandong University) ;
  • Choi, Eun-Mee (Department of Health Care Management, Catholic Kwandong University) ;
  • Kwon, Lee-Seung (Department of Health Care Management, Catholic Kwandong University)
  • Received : 2018.11.07
  • Accepted : 2018.11.16
  • Published : 2018.12.29

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze whether there is a financial incentive effect by analyzing the difference of educational performance between the specialization department students who receive financial support and the students who do not receive support. This study collected survey data of 334 students including 290 students who were financially supported and 44 students who were not financially supported. Through the collected data, frequency analysis and descriptive statistics analysis were performed on the general characteristics of the subjects. T-test was conducted to analyze the difference of teaching & learning performance between students with financial support and those who did not, and then the difference analysis by grades was F-test. The average value of the subjects' teaching & learning satisfaction scores was 2.99, and the result was higher than that of the female students. The higher the age, the higher the grade, the higher the grade, the higher the financial support students were. The average of teaching & learning achievement composition items of the survey subjects was 2.27, and it was found that male students, older students, and students who received financial support had higher average of teaching & learning outcomes than students who did not receive financial support respectively. Students who receive financial support have higher teaching & learning satisfaction and outcomes than students who are not financially supported. The longer the period of financial support, the older the better, and the male students are more satisfied with the teaching & learning, the better the teaching & learning.

Keywords

Table 1. Teaching & learning satisfaction level and teaching & learning achievement contents

JBJTBH_2018_v11n6_807_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Survey participants

JBJTBH_2018_v11n6_807_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Survey subject general characteristics (unit: persons, %)

JBJTBH_2018_v11n6_807_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Major teaching and learning satisfaction (unit: persons, %)

JBJTBH_2018_v11n6_807_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Major teaching & learning outcomes (Unit: persons, %)

JBJTBH_2018_v11n6_807_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Difference of satisfaction with teaching & learning in major

JBJTBH_2018_v11n6_807_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Difference of teaching & learning achievement by group

JBJTBH_2018_v11n6_807_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Differences in teaching & learning performance factors between participating students and non-participating students

JBJTBH_2018_v11n6_807_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Analysis of differences between the departments of group participation and non-participation by grade

JBJTBH_2018_v11n6_807_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10.Difference analysis by grade level of participation department of project team: teaching & learning outcome factor

JBJTBH_2018_v11n6_807_t0010.png 이미지

References

  1. Hwang, C. I. (2017). Present status and improvement plan of financial support projects in major universities in Korea, Journal of Educational Development, 33(2), 69-88.
  2. Bae, S. G. (2014). Local university specialization project, career and manpower development, Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training, The HRD review, 17(3), 112-125.
  3. Lee, H. S., & Lee, Y. M. (2015). Analyzing the Current States of Universities' Interdisciplinary Fields and Influential Factors Impacting on the Fields, Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 5(2), 167-174.
  4. Choi, J. Y. (2017). A Study on the Evaluation and Utilization of Teaching and Learning for the Performance Management of the University Specialization Project, Korea Educational Development Institute, Korea Research Foundation.
  5. Seo, Y. S. (2018). Empirical Approach for Qualitative Improvement in University for Creative Korea Project (CK): Focused on the case of 'the project of raising human resources for the core competency of the global business in the footwear industry, Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(7), 631-646.
  6. Park, A. S., & Kim, H. K. (2016). The Effect of Motivation for Major Choice and Satisfaction in Major on the Adaption of university Life among university students, Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 17(2), 511-519. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.2.511
  7. Shin, H. S., Byoun, S. Y., & Jeon, J. E. (2016). Meaning of Quality and Performance in Higher Education: Reflection and Issues, The Korean Educational Administration Society The Korean Society For The Study Of Educational Administration, Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 34(1), 73-102.
  8. Lee, J. M., & Lee, G. J. (2017). A Study on the Factors Associated with Self-Directed Learning Ability of College Students, Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 3(3), 133-153.
  9. Gong, H. J., & Rhee, B. S. (2014). What Determines Student Engagement?:Focusing on The Effects of College Students' Perceived Learning Environment and Institutional Features, The Korean Educational Administration Society, Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 32(3), 177-207.
  10. Kim, S. M., & Park, C. H. (2016). Development and Validation of CK Satisfaction Scale, The Educational Research Institute, The Journal of Educational Research, 14(4), 41-60.
  11. Choi, E. M., Kwon, L. S., Park, Y. S., & Jung, Y. S. (2018). A Study for Convergence Curriculum of Creative Practical Use of the Direction of Characterization of Healthcare, Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(6), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.6.283
  12. Hwang, S. Y., & Jung, H. J. (2018). The Interactive Effects of Motivation and Contingent Rewards on Employee Creativity, International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(7), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2018.vol9.no7.71.
  13. Han, S. S., & Yim, D. S. (2018). Path Dependence in Industry-University Cooperation - In terms of Industry's Voluntary Participation, International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(3), 45-56.
  14. Choi, J. Y. (2016). Utilization and Analysis of Teaching and Learning Evaluation for the Management of University Specialization Project Performance, Korea Educational Development Institute.
  15. Min, G. O., & Loh, J. H. (2016). Impact of Educational Service Information Distribution on Students' Satisfaction and Achievement Rate, International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 7(4), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2016.vol7.no4.17.
  16. Choi, J. Y. (2016). Exploring Strategies for Improvement of Teaching and Learning Quality in Universities (IV) - Establishment of Evaluation System for Teaching and Learning by College Type: 4-year College.
  17. Park, M. J. (2018). A Study on College Students' Perceptions on CK-I: Based on Analysis of Importance and Satisfaction, Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(10), 589-613.
  18. Cameron, W. J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064003363
  19. Kim, J. H., & Rhee, B. S. (2009). Examining the Differential Impacts of Financial Aid on College GPA by Income Level, The Korean Educational Administration Society, The Journal of Educational Administration, 27(3), 447-470.