참고문헌
- Ziai P, Hayeri MR, Salei A, Salavati A, Houshmand S, Alavi A. Role of optimal quantification of FDG PET imaging in the clinical practice of radiology. RadioGraphics. 2016;36:481-96. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016150102
- Buchbender C, Hartung-Knemeyer V, Forsting M, Antoch G, Heusner TA. Positron emibion tomography (PET) attenuation correction artefacts in PET/CT and PET/MRI. Br J Radiol. 2013;86(1025):20120570. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20120570
- Awan MJ, Siddiqui F, Schwartz D, Yuan J, Machtay M, Yao M. Application of positron emibion tomography/ computed tomography in radiation treatment planning for head and neck cancers. World J Radiol. 2015;7(11):382-93. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i11.382
- Tsubakimoto M, Yamashiro T, Tamashiro Y, Murayama S. Quantitative CT density histogram values and standardized uptake values of FDGPET/ CT with respiratory gating can distinguish solid adenocarcinomas from squamous cell carcinomas of the lung. Radiology. 2018;100:108-15.
-
Salem U, Amini B, Chuang HH, Daw NC, Wei W, et al.
$^{18}F$ -FDG PET/CT as an indicator of survival in ewing sarcoma of bone. J Cancer. 2017;8(15): 2892-8. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.20077 - Tsuyoshi H, Yoshida Y. Diagnostic imaging using positron emibion tomography for gynecological malignancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43(11): 1687-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13436
-
Giraudo C, Raderer M, Karanikas G, Weber M, Kiesewetter B, Dolak W, et al.
$^{18}F$ -fluorodeoxyglucose positron emibion tomography/magnetic resonance in lymphoma: comparison with$^{18}F$ -fluorodeoxyglucose positron emibion tomography/computed tomography and with the addition of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(3):163-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000218 - Rouzet F, Aerts J, Hyafil F, Guludec DL. New-generation CZT cameras: the future of infection imaging? Eur Hear J. 2017;38:444-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw376
- Rubini G. Nuclear medicine: the future in the modern healthcare. Clin Oncol. 2017;2:1271.
- Lee MS, Cho JY, Kim SY, Cheon GJ, Moon MH, Oh S, et al. Diagnostic value of integrated PET/MRI for detection and localization of prostate cancer: comparative study of multiparametric MRI and PET/CT. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45(2):597-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25384
-
Piert M, Montgomery J, Kunju LP, Siddiqui J, Rogers V, Rajendiran T, et al.
$^{18}F$ -choline PET/MRI: the additional value of PET for MRI-guided transrectal prostate biopsies. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(7):1065-70. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.170878 - Radtke JP, Schwab C, Wolf MB, Freitag MT, Alt CD, Kesch C, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy for index tumor detection: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen. Eur Urol. 2016;70(5):846-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052
-
Cho N, Im SA, Cheon GJ, Park IA, Lee KH, Kim TY, et al. Integrated
$^{18}F$ -FDG PET/MRI in breast cancer: early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(3):328-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3849-3 - Cho N, Im SA, Kang KW, Park IA, Song IC, Lee KH, et al. Early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: comparison of single-voxel (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emibion tomography. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(7):2279-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4014-7
- Frank Schelper L, Oeri M, Buchmann I. Accuracy of a topical PET/CT scanner on SUV measurements of small volumes SUV. Curr Med Img Rev. 2015;11(4):262-71. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340561104150727170915
- Hong CM, Ahn BC. Can calcified pulmonary metastases detected by (18)F-FDG PET/CT suggest the primary tumor? Hell J Nucl Med. 2016;19(1):10-2.
-
Jang DG, Yang SO, Lee SH, Bae JL, Kim JK. Characteristic of
$^{18}F$ -FDG excretion according to use diuretics in$^{18}F$ -FDG of PET-CT. J Radiol Sci Technol. 2012;35(2):151-6. -
Kim TH, Ji YB, Song CM, Kim JY, Choi YY, Park JS, et al. SUVmax of
$^{18}F$ -FDG PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules according to tumor volume. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;16(13):217. -
Araz M, Cayir D.
$^{18}F$ -fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emibion tomography/computed tomography for other thyroid cancers: medullary, anaplastic, lymphoma and so forth. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2017;26(1):1-8. - Shin GS, Dong KR. The Difference of standardized uptake value on PET-CT according to change of CT parameters. J Radiol Sci Technol. 2007;30(4):373-9.
- Lyons K, Seghers V, Sorensen JI, Zhang W, Paldino MJ, Krishnamurthy R, et al. Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a tertiary pediatric hospital: a prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(5):1094-101. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.14304
-
Pace L, Nicolai E, Luongo A, Aiello M, Catalano OA, Soricelli A, et al. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of
$^{18}F$ -deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tibues. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(2):289-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.11.002 - Robertson MS, Liu X, Plishker W, Zaki GF, Vyas PK, Safdar NM, et al. Software-based PET-MR image coregistration: combined PET-MRI for the rest of us! Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46(11):1552-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3641-8
- Quick HH, von Gall C, Zeilinger M, Wiesmuller M, Braun H, Ziegler S, et al. Integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging: clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(5):280-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182845a08
- Pujara AC, Raad RA, Ponzo F, Wabong C, Babb JS, Moy L, et al. Standardized uptake values from PET/MRI in metastatic breast cancer: an organ- based comparison with PET/CT. 2016;22(3): 264-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12569
- Kershah S, Partovi S, Traughber BJ, Muzic RF Jr, Schluchter MD, O'Donnell JK, et al. Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population. Mol Imaging Biol. 2013;15(6): 776-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-013-0629-8
- Ruhlmann V, Ruhlmann M, Bellendorf A, Grueneisen J, Sawicki LM, Grafe H, et al. Hybrid imaging for detection of carcinoma of unknown primary: a p reliminary comparis on t rial o f whole-body PET/MRI versus PET/CT. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(11):1941-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.020
-
Grueneisen J, Sawicki LM, Wetter A, Kirchner J, Kinner S, Aktas B, et al. Evaluation of PET and MR datasets in integrated
$^{18}F$ -FDG PET/MRI: a comparison of different MR sequences for whole-body restaging of breast cancer patients. Eur J Radiol. 2017;89:14-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.019 - Delso G, Furst S, Jakoby B, Ladebeck R, Ganter C, et al. Performance measurements of the siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1-9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.076018
-
Sachpekidis C, Hillengab J, Goldschmidt H, Mosebach J, Pan L, et al. Comparison of
$^{18}F$ -FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI in patients with multiple myeloma. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 5(5):469-78. -
Khalaf M, Abdel-Nabi H, Baker J, Shao Y, Lamonica D, Gona J. Relation between nodule size and
$^{18}F$ -FDG-PET SUV for malignant and benign pulmonary nodules. J Hematol Oncol. 2008;1:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-1-13 -
Partovi S, Kohan A, Vercher-Conejero JL, Rubbert C, Margevicius S, Schluchter MD, et al. Qualitative and quantitative performance of
$^{18}F$ -FDG-PET/MRI versus$^{18}F$ -FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer. Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(10):1970-5. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3993 - Freitag MT, Fenchel M, BCumer P, Heuber T, Rank CM, Kachelrieb M, et al. Improved clinical workflow for simultaneous whole-body PET/MRI using high-resolution CAIPIRINHA-accelerated MR-based attenuation correction. Eur J Radiol. 2017;96:12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.09.007
- Muzic RF, DiFilippo Jr FP. PET/MRI-technical review. Semin Roentgenol. 2014;49(3):242-54. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ro.2014.10.001
- Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(1):11-20. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.057182
- Rakheja R, Chandarana H, DeMello L, Jackson K, Geppert C, Faul D, et al. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(5):1115-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11304
-
Schwenzer NF, Schmidt H, Gatidis S, Brendle C, Muller M, Knigsrainer I, et al. Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emibion tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: c omparis on with
$^{18}F$ -FDG-PET. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40(5): 1121-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24497