DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study on the Traditional Market with the Department Store for Placeness Analysis - Focusing on Namdaemun Market Area -

재래시장 장소성 해석을 위한 백화점과의 비교연구 - 남대문상권을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2018.07.29
  • Accepted : 2018.11.14
  • Published : 2018.12.30

Abstract

The traditional market has formed for itself through a long time thus has special value of the place. The tangible value of the traditional market is high, however, it became jeopardized to be dismantled since it can not cope with the consumption environment of modern society. Modern industrial society provides an inefficiently and standardized solution to the traditional market by ignoring the identity of place only by the value the traditional market in the law of large distribution industry. This study aims to define the placeness of Namdaemun traditional market by considering tangible value of place. The identity of the place was analyzed as a spatial configuration, space organization, and sense of place through the place's physical setting, activities, and meanings by Edward Ralph. Based on the analysis by Ralph, we analyzed the traditional market and compare to the department store, which is the representative of large scale distributor, using comparative method. We performed quantitative and integrative analysis for the placeness and provide a way to appraise the worth of the traditional market by deviating from the traditional evaluation method.

Keywords

References

  1. Baek, J. (2006). A study on the morphology of the large-scaled retail complex building in Namdaemon traditional market area, Thesis, University of Seoul, 54.
  2. Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place, London, Architectural Press.
  3. Choi, B. (2002). The loss and the restoration of placeness in capitalist society, Journal of Urban Studies, 8(0), 253-278.
  4. Choi, J. (2015). A design study of the urban park project on Namdaemun Traditional Market, Thesis, Hanyang University, 115-116.
  5. Choi, S., Park, H., Son, M., & Jeon, Y. (2005). 21C fashion marketing, Seoul, Changjisa, 241.
  6. Choi, Y. (2003). Society and space, Seoul, Spacetime, 234-236.
  7. Han, J. (2009). A study on the embodiment of placeness in contemporary architecture through works of Rem Koolhaas and a design proposal for revitalization of traditional market, Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(1), 131-136.
  8. Heidegger, M. (1969). Identity and Difference, New York, Harper and Row, 26.
  9. Jeon, B. (2006). Characteristic of spatial configuration in the informal structure of Frank O. Gehry, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 22(6), 40.
  10. Jo, S. (2005). Towards a revitalization scheme of Namdeamun traditional market, Thesis, University of Seoul, 53.
  11. John, M. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design, Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418
  12. Kim, C. (2002). A study on the regeneration of Sungnam city's Morahn traditional market, Thesis, Hong-Ik University.
  13. Kim, D. (2015). Introduction to distribution, Seoul, Jinsaem media, 54-55.
  14. Kim, H. (1999). Retail layout and merchandising presentation, Hansuhyeop Press, 167.
  15. Kim, T. (2005). The placeness in specialized urban traditional market, Thesis, Hanyang University.
  16. Kim, Y. (1999). Spatial Configuration, Spatial Cognitionand Spatial Behaviour. PhD Thesis, University of London.
  17. Kim, Y. (2015). Analysis of policy direction to revitalize the traditional market place, Korea Association of Business Education, 30(2), 325-350.
  18. Kim, Y. (2000). A study on the relationship between spatial configuration and spatial cognition, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 16(10), 37-44.
  19. KRIHS, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. (2005). Pioneers in modern spatial theories, Paju, Academy Hanul, 41.
  20. Kwon, Y. (2011). A Study on the structural equation modeling of Insa-dong street's sense of place, Journal of Korea Planning Association, 46(2), 139-151.
  21. Lee, H. (2011). The effects of physical environmental determinants on place identity in commercial streets, Journal of Urban Design Institute of Korea, 12(1), 48.
  22. Lee, S. (2009). A study on the planning of urban public space reflecting the characteristics of site, Thesis, Chungju National University.
  23. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city, Cambridge, Mass: MIT press.
  24. Punter, J. V. (1991). Participation in the design of urban space, Landscape Design, 200, 24-27.
  25. Relph, E. (2005). Place and placelessness, Seoul, Nonhyeong, 237.
  26. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness, London, Pion Ltd.
  27. Seamon, D. & Sowers, J. (2008). Place and Placelessness, Edward Relph in Key Texts in Human Geography, London, Sage, 43-51.
  28. Seoul Museum of History. (2013). Namdaemun market, Seoul, Seoul Museum of History, 77-78, 80-98.
  29. Shim, N. (2003). Visual Merchandising, Seoul, Wooyong, 258.
  30. Sung, W. (2012). A Study on the Characters of Urban.Architectural Space in Namdae-Mun Market District, Seoul, Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 14(1), 131-141.
  31. Tuan, Y. F. (1995). Space and Place, Seoul, Daeyun Press, 205.
  32. Tuan, Y. F. (1979). Philosophy in geography: Space and Place, Theory and Decision Library, 20, 408.