DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Urease Characteristics and Phylogenetic Status of Bacillus paralicheniformis

  • Jeong, Do-Won (Department of Food and Nutrition, Dongduk Women's University) ;
  • Lee, Byunghoon (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Lee, Hyundong (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Jeong, Keuncheol (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Jang, Mihyun (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Hoon (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyonggi University)
  • Received : 2018.09.17
  • Accepted : 2018.10.19
  • Published : 2018.12.28

Abstract

In 2015, Bacillus paralicheniformis was separated from B. licheniformis on the basis of phylogenomic and phylogenetic studies, and urease activity was reported as a phenotypic property that differentiates between the two species. Subsequently, we have found that the urease activity of B. paralicheniformis is strain-specific, and does not reliably discriminate between species, as strains having the same urease gene cluster were identified in B. licheniformis and B. sonorensis, the closest relatives of B. paralicheniformis. We developed a multilocus sequence typing scheme using eight housekeeping genes, adk, ccpA, glpF, gmk, ilvD, pur, spo0A, and tpi to clearly identify B. paralicheniformis from closely related Bacillus species and to find a molecular marker for the rapid identification of B. paralicheniformis. The scheme differentiated 33 B. paralicheniformis strains from 90 strains formerly identified as B. licheniformis. Among the eight housekeeping genes, spo0A possesses appropriate polymorphic sites for the design of a B. paralichenofomis-specific PCR primer set. The primer set designed in this study perfectly separated B. paralicheniformis from B. licheniformis and B. sonorensis.

Keywords

References

  1. Jeong DW, Kim HR, Jung G, Han S, Kim CT, Lee JH. 2014. Bacterial community migration in the ripening of doenjang, a traditional Korean fermented soybean food. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24: 648-660. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1401.01009
  2. Dunlap CA, Kwon SW, Rooney AP, Kim SJ. 2015. Bacillus paralicheniformis sp. nov., isolated from fermented soybean paste. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 65: 3487-3492. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.000441
  3. Mobley HL, Island MD, Hausinger RP. 1995. Molecular biology of microbial ureases. Microbiol. Rev. 59: 451-480.
  4. Konieczna I, Zarnowiec P, Kwinkowski M, Kolesinska B, Fraczyk J, Kaminski Z, et al. 2012. Bacterial urease and its role in long-lasting human diseases. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 13: 789-806. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920312804871094
  5. Dupuy B, Daube G, Popoff MR, Cole ST. 1997. Clostridium perfringens urease genes are plasmid borne. Infect. Immun. 65: 2313-2320.
  6. Lam S, Yeo M. 1980. Urease-positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain. J. Clin. Microbiol. 12: 57-59. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.12.1.57-59.1980
  7. Jeong DW, Heo S, Ryu S, Blom J, Lee JH. 2017. Genomic insights into the virulence and salt tolerance of Staphylococcus equorum. Sci. Rep. 7: 5383. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05918-5
  8. Jeong DW, Jeong M, Lee JH. 2017. Antibiotic susceptibilities and characteristics of Bacillus licheniformis isolates from traditional Korean fermented soybean foods. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 75: 565-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.10.001
  9. Lee JH, Jeong DW. 2017. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus paralicheniformis 14DA11, exhibiting resistance to clindamycin and erythromycin. Genome Announc. 5: e01216-17.
  10. Jeong DW, Lee B, Lee JH. 2018. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus licheniformis 14ADL4 exhibiting resistance to clindamycin. Kor. J. Microbiol. 54: 169-170.
  11. Madslien EH, Olsen JS, Granum PE, Blatny JM. 2012. Genotyping of B. licheniformis based on a novel multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) scheme. BMC Microbiol. 12: 230. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-230
  12. Priest FG, Barker M, Baillie LW, Holmes EC, Maiden MC. 2004. Population structure and evolution of the Bacillus cereus group. J. Bacteriol. 186: 7959-7970. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.23.7959-7970.2004
  13. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
  14. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33: 1870-1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  15. Maiden MC. 2006. Multilocus sequence typing of bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 60: 561-588. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121325
  16. Dunlap CA, Kim SJ, Kwon SW, Rooney AP. 2016. Bacillus velezensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Bacillus methylotrophicus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum and 'Bacillus oryzicola' are later heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus velezensis based on phylogenomics. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66: 1212-1217. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.000858
  17. Fan B, Blom J, Klenk HP, Borriss R. 2017. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis, and Bacillus siamensis form an "Operational Group B. amyloliquefaciens" within the B. subtilis species complex. Front. Microbiol. 8: 22.
  18. EFSA. 2016. Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agentsintentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 5:suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA untilSeptember 2016. EFSA J. 15: 4663.
  19. Wang Y, Liu H, Liu K, Wang C, Ma H, Li Y, et al. 2017. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus paralicheniformis MDJK30, a plant growth-promoting Rhizobacterium with antifungal activity. Genome Announc. 5: e00577-17.
  20. Daas MS, Rosana ARR, Acedo JZ, Douzane M, Nateche F, Kebbouche-Gana S, et al. 2018. Draft genome sequence of Bacillus paralicheniformis F47, isolated from an Algerian salty lake. Genome Announc. 6: e00190-18.

Cited by

  1. Two genes involved in clindamycin resistance of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus paralicheniformis identified by comparative genomic analysis vol.15, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231274
  2. Selection of Lactococcus lactis HY7803 for Glutamic Acid Production Based on Comparative Genomic Analysis vol.31, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2011.11022
  3. Functional Annotation Genome Unravels Potential Probiotic Bacillus velezensis Strain KMU01 from Traditional Korean Fermented Kimchi vol.10, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030563
  4. Functional Genomic Insights into Probiotic Bacillus siamensis Strain B28 from Traditional Korean Fermented Kimchi vol.10, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10081906
  5. Genome sequencing and identification of cellulase genes in Bacillus paralicheniformis strains from the Red Sea vol.21, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02316-w