References
- Machado GL. CBCT imaging - a boon to orthodontics. Saudi Dent J 2015; 27: 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.08.004
- Eskandarloo A, Mirshekari A, Poorolajal J, Mohammadi Z, Shokri A. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with intraoral photostimulable phosphor imaging plate for diagnosis of endodontic complications: a simulation study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 114: e54-61.
- Shokri A, Mortazavi H, Salemi F, Javadian A, Bakhtiari H, Matlabi H. Diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: a comparison study. Biomed J 2013; 36: 18-22. https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-4170.107156
- Shokri A, Khajeh S, Khavid A. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25: 1710-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000908
- Almog DM, Romano PR. CT-based dental imaging for implant planning and surgical guidance. N Y State Dent J 2007; 73: 51-3.
- Mah J, Hatcher D. Three-dimensional craniofacial imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 308-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.024
- White S, Pharoah M. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2014.
- Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 290-7.
- Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x
- Rodrigues AF, Campos MJ, Chaoubah A, Fraga MR, Farinazzo Vitral RW. Use of gray values in CBCT and MSCT images for determination of density: influence of variation of FOV size. Implant Dent 2015; 24: 155-9.
- Palomo JM, Rao PS, Hans MG. Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 773-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.019
- Eskandarloo A, Abdinian M, Salemi F, Hashemzadeh Z, Safaei M. Effect of object location on the density measurement in cone-beam computed tomography versus multislice computed tomography. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012; 9 (Suppl 1): S81-7.
- Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 323-35. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/19603304
- Silva IM, Freitas DQ, Ambrosano GM, Boscolo FN, Almeida SM. Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26: 550-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000600011
- Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12679
- Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Singer SR, Mupparapu M. CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44: 20140238. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140238
- Ribeiro-Rotta RF, Pereira AC, Oliveira GH, Freire MC, Leles CR, Lindh C. An exploratory survey of diagnostic methods for bone quality assessment used by Brazilian dental implant specialists. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 698-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02102.x
- Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x
- Misch CE. Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive bone loading. Int J Oral Implantol 1990; 6: 23-31.
- Rinkel J, Gerfault L, Esteve F, Dinten JM. A new method for x-ray scatter correction: first assessment on a cone-beam CT experimental setup. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 4633-52. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/15/018
- Bryant JA, Drage NA, Richmond S. Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 365-74. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/13227258
- Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, et al. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107:420-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.049
- Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, et al. Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104:829-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.12.005
- Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:873-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02076.x
- Santiago RC, de Paula FO, Fraga MR, Picorelli Assis NM, Vitral RW. Correlation between miniscrew stability and bone mineral density in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 243-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.031
- Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Koos R, Das M, Pohl S, Stanzel S, et al. Influence of a small field-of-view size on the detection of coronary artery calcifications with MSCT: in vitro and in vivo study. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 358-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2881-z
- Pauwels R, Nackaerts O, Bellaiche N, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K, Walker A, et al. Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations. Br J Radiol 2013; 86: 20120135. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20120135
- Codari M, de Faria Vasconcelos K, Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo L, Haiter Neto F, Jacobs R. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifacts using different CBCT devices, high-density materials and field of views. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 1509-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13019
- Sonya DA, Davies J, Ford NL. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography image quality obtained in phantoms with different fields of view, voxel size, and angular rotation for iCAT NG. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2016; 4: 31-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-3841.183821
- Kim DG. Can dental cone beam computed tomography assess bone mineral density? J Bone Metab 2014; 21: 117-26. https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2014.21.2.117
- Siltanen S, Kolehmainen V, Jarvenpaa S, Kaipio JP, Koistinen P, Lassas M, et al. Statistical inversion for medical x-ray tomography with few radiographs: I. General theory. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48: 1437-63. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/10/314
- Bryant JA, Drage NA, Richmond S. Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 365-74. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/13227258