DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Case Analysis of Career Commitment using Holland's Hexagonal Model Profiles

Holland 6각형 프로파일을 통한 진로몰입 사례분석

  • Noh, Yang-Hee (Dept. of vocation, Kyunggi University Graduate School)
  • 노양희 (경기대학교 일반대학원 직업학과)
  • Received : 2018.01.04
  • Accepted : 2018.03.09
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

This study was designed to analyze the behavior characteristics of people, who have the same or similar Investigative (I) and Enterprising (E) Holland code scores, toward their career commitment. The calculus of the two codes is .16, which means that they are inconsistent and full of oppositions. Especially, the focus of the analysis is whether there are any differences in career commitment between people who have similarly high or low scores of their I and E codes and, if there are differences, what are their characteristics The analysis shows that the participants with high scores of their I and E codes have strong career commitment. They are highly goal oriented and motivated and with a long future time perspective they seek for progress in their careers. Due to their high career expectations and career resilience, they are willing to invest in their careers and put up with a certain level of sacrifice. They place the emphasis on their independence and are not very influenced by the surrounding environment. While the participants with low scores of their I and E codes also perceive the importance of their career commitment, they are very much affected by people and external stimuli. As a result, their efforts in terms of their career commitment are easily disturbed and lowered. The critical factor causing the difference between these two types of people is related to the score of their Social(S) code. This research has the potential to provide improvement points for career counselling.

본 연구는 Holland 6각형 모형에서 계측성 상관계수가 .16으로서 둘 간 상관이 매우 낮은 탐구형(I)과 진취형(E)이 결합할 때 나타나는 진로몰입과 관련한 행동 특성을 분석하고자 한다. 특히 탐구형(I)과 진취형(E)이 각각 높은 점수로 동일하거나, 유사한 값을 가진 개인과 각각 낮은 점수로 동일하거나 유사한 개인은 진로몰입에 대해 다르게 행동하는가? 다르다면 어떻게 다른 행동 특성을 나타내는지 분석하고자 한다. 연구는 두 코드값 18점 이상자 3명과 18점 미만자 3명을 대상으로 면담을 진행하여 그 내용을 분석하였다. 분석 결과 탐구형(I)과 진취형(E) 코드값이 동시에 높은 연구대상자들은 높은 진로몰입을 보였는데 목표지향성이 매우 강하고 긴 미래시간전망을 가지고 발전을 추구하며 스스로 동기부여를 잘하는 것으로 나타났다. 동시에 높은 진로기대감과 진로탄력성을 가지고 진취적으로 자신의 진로를 계획하며 일정한 희생도 감수했다. 독립성을 중시하고 타인이나 외부환경의 영향에 민감하지 않으며 독자적인 진로 의사결정을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 반면 탐구형(I)과 진취형(E) 코드값이 동시에 낮은 연구대상자들은 진로몰입의 중요성을 잘 알고 의지도 있으며 스스로 몰입하고 있다고 생각하기도 하나 실상은 주변 사람이나 외부 환경의 영향으로 몰입도가 낮아지는 모순을 나타냈다. 이들은 미래 진로에 대해 관심을 가지고 있었지만 자신의 논리에 근거한 일관성이나 계획보다는 주변의 평가나 관계, 외부환경의 끌리는 자극에 민감히 반응하여 결정이나 계획이 움직이는 경향을 보였다. 이 때 진로몰입의 수준과 특성을 결정하는 것은 사회형(S) 코드값의 크기와 관련이 있다. 본 연구는 심층적 진로상담서비스에 활용될 수 있는데 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. J. L. Holland, Making Vocational Choices: A theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments(3rd ed.), Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., Odessa, FL. 1997.
  2. J. L. Holland, Making Vocational Choices: A theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments(2nd ed.), Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey Prentice-Hall, 1985.
  3. J. L. Holland, Making Vocational Choices: A theory of Vocational Personalities and Work environments(2nd ed.), Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., Odessa, FL. 1992.
  4. G. J. Blau, "The Measurement and Prediction of Career Commitment", Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 58, no. 4 pp. 277-288, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1985.tb00201.x
  5. V. A. Harren, "A Model of Career Decision Making for College Students", Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 14, no. 2 pp. 119-133, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90065-4
  6. S. Aryee, K. Tan, "Attendance and Outcomes of Career Commitment", Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 40, no. 3 pp. 288-305, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(92)90052-2
  7. D. T. Hall, "A Theoretical Model of Career Subidentity Development in Organizational Setting", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 6, no. 1 pp. 50-76, 1971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(71)90005-5
  8. K. D. Carson, "Career Commitment: Construction of a Measure and Examination of its Psychometric Properties", Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 237-262, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1017
  9. F. Noordin, W. Trevor, C. Zimmer, "Career Commitment in Collectivist and Individualist Cultures: a Comparative Study", The International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 13, no. 2 pp. 35-54, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190110092785
  10. Eddie W. L. Cheng, Danny C. K. Ho, "The Influence of Job and Career Attitudes on Learning Motivation and Transfer", Career Development International, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 20-28, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430110381007
  11. B. H. Jung, C. G. Ahn, "Career Development of Adults with Artistic and Conventional Occupation", Journal of Educational Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-30, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1926.10879661
  12. B. J. Kim, "Relationships among Congruence Level of Holland Vocational Types, Job Satisfaction and Job Accomplishment", Chungnam National University, Ph.D Thesis, 2008.
  13. M. M. Nauta, "The Development, Evolution, and Status of Holland's of Vocational Personalities: Reflections and Future Directions for Counseling Psychology", Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 11-22, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018213
  14. Terence J. G. Tracey, B. Wille, M. R. Durr II, F De Fruyt, "An Enhanced Examination of Holland's Consistency and Differentiation Hypotheses", Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 237-247. 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.01.008
  15. T. T. Ishitani, "Exploring the Effects of Congruence and Holland's Personality Codes on Job Satisfaction: An application of Hierarchical Linear Modeling Techniques", Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 16-24, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.014
  16. M. O. Wiley, T. M. Magoon, "Holland High-point Social Types: Is Consistency Related to Persistence and Achievement", Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 14-21, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(82)90059-8
  17. J. L. Huang, M. Pearce, "The Other Side of the Coin: Vocational Interests, Interest Differentiation and Annual Income at the Occupational level of Analysis", Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 83, no. 3 pp. 315-326, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.003
  18. B. S. Kim, J. I. Lee, "The Case Study of Consistency and Calculus using Holland's Hexagonal Model on the Career Indecisive Clients", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 15, no. 20 pp. 828-837, 2014. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.2.828
  19. S. H. Choi, S. H. Seo, S. Y. Song, "The Analysis of Vocational Behavior in the Inconsistency Profiles using Holland's Hexagonal Model" KAIS, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 509-525, 2017.
  20. A. B. Barker, E. Demerouti, "The Job Demands‐ Resources Model: State of the Art" The Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol. 22, no. 3 pp. 309-328, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
  21. H. D. Kim, J. W. Kim, Y. J. Choi, "A Study on the Relationship of Job Characteristics, Job Involvement, and Self-Efficacy of Employees in Domestic Corporations", Journal of Corporate Education and Talent, vol. 16, no. 1 pp. 101-127, 2014.
  22. S. K, Hwang, "A Study on the Effects of Self-Leadership on Job Involvement: The Mediating Effects of Intrinsic Motivation", pp. 87-103, 2011.
  23. Y. H. Choi, Qualitative Research: Methods and Practices, Education and Science sa, 2012.
  24. J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions, Hakjisa, 2010.
  25. R. E. Stake, Art of Case Study Research : Perspectives on Practice, Sage Publications, 1995.
  26. I. Seidman, Interviewing as Qualitative Research (3rd. Ed.), Hakjisa, 2009.
  27. S. N. Cho, H. J. Lee, Y. J. Joo, N. Y. Kim, Qualitative Research Design & Practice, Hakjisa, 2011.
  28. Y. C. Kim, S, W Jung, Qualitative Research Methodology5: Data Analysis, Seoul: Academi press, 2017.