Strategy21

Korea Institute for Maritime Strategy (한국해양전략연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effectiveness of Naval Blockade as a Method of Sanctions - Focusing on the Analysis of Peacetime Naval Blockades after WW2 -

국가 제재수단으로서 평시 해상봉쇄의 효과성의 분석에 대한 연구

  • Received : 2018.11.30
  • Accepted : 2018.12.26
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Why did Kim Jong Un turn his foreign policy upside down in a sudden? US naval blockade became one of candidates for the reason since it had been threatened by Trump administration for the first time in December 2017. Has the blockades worked well like that in the international politic history? This paper reveals the effectiveness of naval blockade on sanctioning in the peacetime. This research analyzes three hypothetical arguments about the naval blockade based on the result of empirical tests with TIES Dataset. First, sanctions by blockading are more effective in gaining political benefits than the other economic sanctions. It was ranked the 4th effective way of sanction out of 9. And 56.3% of pacific naval blockades without packaged economic sanctions were succeeded, whereas the possibility of success increase up to 61.2% when blockade has been imposed in accordance with the other type of economic sanctions. Second, blockades deter military collisions, even war. When it comes to military provocation issue, blockading sanctions gain political interest far more than the other type of economic sanctions. The possibility of the success reaches up to 74%. Also, there wasn't any historical cases of war incurred by blockading sanctions within 5 years after the blockade end. Third, policy makers just need 1.2 years on average to see the end of sanctions when they choose the naval blockade as the method of imposing sanction on the adversary. It is impressively short span of time in achieving political goal compared to the other types of sanctions which are need 9 years on average. North East Asia sea could be the next stage for a naval blockade sooner or later. Because China and Japan not only possess capabilities of blockade but also have will to impose blockades to the others if conditions are set. And even the North Korea with lots of submerging forces could be a blockading threat in the specific area. So, the Republic of Korea has to pay more attention and be prepared for naval blockading sanction.

Keywords

References

  1. 대한민국 국방부. 2016 국방백서. 서울: 대한민국 국방부, 2016.
  2. 진영제. 사회과학 연구조사 방법론. 서울: 박영사, 2011.
  3. Academia Research, Encyclopedia of Political science. (Michigan: The University of Michigan, 2002).
  4. Brodie, Bernard. A Guide to Naval Strategy. (New York: Prager, 1965).
  5. Clausewitz, Carl Von. On War, translated and edited by Howard, Michael; Paret, Peter. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).
  6. Clausewitz, Carl Von, On War, translated by Graham, J. J.. (Auckland: The Floating Press, 2010).
  7. Corbett, Julian S.. 김종민 역. 해양전략의 원칙. 서울: 해군본부, 1986.
  8. Hufbauer, Gary Clyde; Schott, Jeffrey J.; Elliott, Kimberly Ann. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: Supplemental Case Histories. (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1985).
  9. Mearsheimer, John J.. 이춘근 역. 강대국 국제정치의 비극. 서울: 김앤김북스, 2017.
  10. Till, Geoffrey. Maritime Strategy and The Nuclear Age. (London: Macmilan Press, 1984).
  11. 김기주. "중국해군력 부상의 위협성 평가." 신아시아 제19권 제1호, 서울: 신아시아연구소, 2012.
  12. 김덕기. "동북아 해군력 군비경쟁." STRATEGY 21 Vol.21, No.1, Summer 2018.
  13. 김영규. "해상봉쇄의 변화에 관한 연구." 연세대학원 석사 논문, 2003.
  14. 이민효. "해상무력분쟁에 적용되는 봉쇄법의 발전과 과제." 해양연구논총 제29집, 진해: 해군사관학교 해군해양연구소, 2001.
  15. 이대우. "6자 회담과 미국." 정세와 정책 통권86호. 성남: 세종연구소, 2003.
  16. 윤성학. "김정은, 美 해상차단에 무릎 꿇었다." 신동아, 2018년 3월 25일.
  17. 주성환; 강진권. "한중경제관계 확대의 정치적 효과." 한중사회과학연구, 제26권 2013.
  18. 최낙균; 임영귀. 동아시아의 가치사슬구조와 역내국간 FTA의 경제적 효과 분석, 정책연구보고서, 서울: 대외경제정책연구원, 2013.
  19. 최정환; 조윤철; 고성필; 황원식. "우리나라 수출.입 해상물동량 감소에 따른 경제적 파급효과 분석." 해양정책연구 제32권 제1호, 2017.
  20. Gardner, Timothy. "US Won't Hesitate to Impose Sanctions Over Fuel to N.Korea." Reuters, 23 Sept. 2018.
  21. Keeley, Gregory. "North Korea sanctions are not working - a naval blockade might." Fox News, 31 Dec. 2017.
  22. Lektzian, David; Souva, Mark. "An Institutional Theory of Sanctions Onset and Success." Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.51, No.6, 2007.
  23. Marinov, Nikolay. "Do Economic Sanctions Destabilize Country Leaders?." American Journal of Political Science, Vol.49, No.3, 2005.
  24. Morgan, T. Clifton; Navin, Bapat A.; Krustev, Valentin. "Threat and Imposition of Economic Sanctions 1971-2000." Conflict management and peace science, Vol.26, No.1, 2009.
  25. Morgan, T. Clifton; Navin, Bapat A.; Krustev, Valentin, "Threat and Imposition of Economic Sanctions 1945-2005: Updating the TIES dataset." Conflict management and peace science, Vol.31, No.5, 2014.
  26. Morgan, T. Clifton; Palmer, Glenn; Miers, Anne. "Economic Sanctions and Foreign Policy Substitutability." Washington, D.C.: The 96th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 2000.
  27. O'Quinn, Robert P.. "A User's Guide To Economic Sanctions." Heritage Foundation, 1997.
  28. Quek, Kai; Alastair Iain. "Can China Back Down?." International Security, Vol.42, No.3, Winter 2017/2018.
  29. Richardson, Michael. "Naval powers in Asia : Rise of Chinese navy changes the balance Viewpoints." Institute of South East Asian Studies, 2010.
  30. Roblin, Sebastien. "How the Falklands War(Thanks to a Stealthy Submarine) Could Have Gone Very Differently." The National Interest, 2016.
  31. The Economist Intelligence Unit N.A.. "Sanctions, History lessons." The Economist, Vol.381, 2006.
  32. Tomz, Michael. "Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach." International Organization, Vol 61, Fall 2007.
  33. "국제연맹규약." 두산백과 (검색일: 2018. 9.28.)
  34. "이상주의." 21세기 정치학대사전 (검색일: 2018. 9.28.)
  35. "제재." 21세기 정치학대사전 (검색일: 2018. 9.28.)
  36. "중국 인민해방군 해군." Wikipedia (검색일: 2018. 9.16.)
  37. "U-boat." wikipedia (검색일: 2018. 9.28.)
  38. http://blog.naver.com/china_lab/221322867440 (검색일: 2018. 9.24.)
  39. http://monthly.chosun.com/client/news/viw.asp?ctcd=G&nNewsNumb=201210100027&page=12 (검색일: 2018. 9.21.)
  40. http://news.abs-cbn.com/nation/regions/09/12/12/3-chinese-ships-seen-scarborough-pcg (검색일: 2018. 9.21.)
  41. http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2015/01/13/2015011303716.html (검색일: 2018. 9.20.)
  42. http://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace (검색일: 2018. 9.15.)
  43. http://piie.com/commentary/speeches-papers/trade-weapon (검색일: 2018. 9.18.)
  44. http://www.correlatesofwar.org/data-sets (검색일: 2018 9.15.)
  45. http://www.defenseworld.net/news/13037/PLA_Navy_To_Have_415_Warships_By_2030__US_expert_Says#.W7Tt5TbCqIU (검색일자: 2018. 9.10.)
  46. http://www.index.go.kr/unify/idx-info.do?idxCd=4006 (검색일: 2018. 9.25.)
  47. http://www.newsis.com/view/?id=NISX20180702_0000351901&cID=10101&pID=10100 (검색일: 2018. 9.22.)
  48. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-missiles-kcna/north-korea-says-naval-blockade-would-be-act-of-war-vows-action-idUSKBN1E81VE (검색일: 2018. 9.15.)
  49. Morgan, T. Clifton; Navin, Bapat A.; Kobayashi, Yoshiharu. "TIES data 4.0 User's Manual Case Level Data." June 2013. http://sanctions.web.unc.edu/ (검색일: 2018. 9.10.).