Strategy21

Korea Institute for Maritime Strategy (한국해양전략연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on US Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy and Distributed Lethality

인도-태평양(FOIP) 전략과 전력분산의 치명성에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2018.11.30
  • Accepted : 2018.12.26
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The U.S. has recently developed Free and Open Indo-Pacific strategy and Distributed Lethality strategy based on a common perception that they are responding to China's threats. In the future, it is anticipated the following. Strengthen cooperation of the U.S.-India-Vietnam navy, Maximizing the combined combat power between the U.S. and regional navies, Improving its ability to restore damage control, Economic cooperation between the Pacific and Indian countries. The meanings given to the Korean navy are as follows. First, South Korea should pursue cooperation with the Indian Navy, which will grow into a regional balance on China's growth. The growth of the Indian navy is expected to increase cooperation with other Pacific countries. The government should seek ways to promote cooperation with india navy in various fields. Secondly, it is a joint drill between the U.S. Navy and the Korean Navy. Recently, the Korea-U.S. joint drill has not been conducted and many changes are expected to be made regarding the implementation of the joint drill in the future. Therefore, it is necessary to respond to possible changes in the naval relationship between Korea navy and the U.S. navy Also, due to distributed lethality strategy, preparations for operations and training with U.S.navy will be necessary. Lastly, it should contribute to cooperation among regional countries in preparation for maritime territorial disputes. The growth of the Chinese navy and the territorial disputes in the East and South China sea has raised the possibility of accidental military clashes at sea. Therefore, the government should make efforts to create multilateral security cooperation systems that can continue to promote the prevention of armed conflict.

Keywords

References

  1. 김찬완, "모디정부 외교정책의 결정요인: 지속과 변화를 중심으로," 남아시아연구 제24권 제2호(2018)
  2. 안성규, "중국 탄도미사일이 한반도에 던지는 함의", Issue Brief (2015.11)
  3. 정구연, "미중 세력전이와 미국 해양전략의 변화" 국가전략 제24권 제3호(2018)
  4. 이대우, "새로운 전략공간으로 부상한 인도-태평양 지역", 정세와 정책 (2017.12)
  5. 이재현, "인도-퍼시픽, 새로운 전략 공간의 등장", Issue Brief (2015.10), p.3.
  6. 정호섭, "미 해군의 새로운 전력운용 개념," KIMS Periscope (2018. 11. 8.) 참조.
  7. 최정현, "미국 해군의 공세적 해양전략과 전투함대-마한으로의 회귀?," KIMS PERISCOPE 제85호 (2017. 6.11).
  8. 한국전략문제연구소, 2015 동아시아 전략평가 (서울: 한국전략문제연구소, 2015)
  9. Australian National University, "INDO-PACIFIC MARITIME SECURITY: CHALLENGES AND COOPERATION," National Security College (July 2016).
  10. Australia Government Department of Defence, "Defence White Paper," http://www.defence.gov.au/whitepaper/2013/docs/WP_ 2013_web.pdf.
  11. Bryan Clark, Commanding The Seas: A Plan to reinvigorate U.S. Navy Surface Warfare (Washington D.C.: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2014).
  12. Chacko, P, "The rise of the Indo-Pacific: understanding ideational change and continuity in India's foreign policy," Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol.68, No.4 (2014).
  13. COMMANDER NAVAL SURFACE FORCES, "Surface Force Strategy-Return to Sea Control,"
  14. C. Raja Mohan, Samudra Manthan: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific, Washington. D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.(2012)
  15. David Scott, "Australia's embrace of the 'Indo- Pacific': new term, new region, new strategy?," International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol.13, No.4 (2013).
  16. Harsh Pant and Yogesh Joshi "The American "Pivot" and the Indian Navy: It's Hedging All the Way," Naval War College Review, Vol.68, No.1 (Winter 2015).
  17. Harsh V. Pant, "The American "Pivot" and the Indian Navy, Naval War College Review, Vol.68, No.1(Winter 2015)
  18. Hillary Clinton, "America's Engagement in the Asia- Pacific, 28 October 2010,"
  19. Jeffrey D. Wilson, "INDO-PACIFIC INSIGHT SERIES Investing in the economic architecture of theIndo-Pacific", Research Fellow, Perth US Asia Centre, Vol.8 (August 2017).
  20. Jim Thomas, Gateway to the Indo-Pacific: Australian Defense Strategy and the Future of the Australia-U.S. Alliance (Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment, 2013).
  21. Midford, Paul. "Japan's Approach to Maritime Security in the South China Sea," Asian Survey, Vol.55 (2015).
  22. RED ALERT: The Growing threat to U.S. Aircraft Carriers," Center for a New American Security, February 22, 2016.
  23. Rahul Roy-Chaudhury, India's Maritime Security (New Delhi: Knowledge World, 2000).
  24. THE WHITE HOUSE, "NSS of the United States of America,"
  25. Toshi Yoshihara, "The US Navy's Indo-Pacific challenge," Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, Vol.9, No.1 (2013).
  26. U.S. Department of Defense. "Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Develop ments Involving the People's Republic of China 2015,"(2015).
  27. U.S. Department of Defense. "Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2016,"(2016).
  28. U.S. Department of Defense, "Remarks by Secretary Mattis at Plenary Session of the 2018 Shangri-La Dialogue."
  29. "Asia's Democratic Security Diamond," Project Syndicate, December 27, 2017.
  30. "Distributed Lethality and the Importance of Ship Repair," THE STRATEGY BRIDGE, Feburary 14, 2017.
  31. "Distributed Lethality," U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTE, January, 2015.
  32. "HIMARS test advances USN surface-ship lethality potential," Jane's 360, October 24, 2017.
  33. "Historic First: F35B Lands on Wasp, Launching Era of Increased Navy-Marine Corps Sea-based Capabilities in Indo-Pacific," United state Navy, March 5, 2018.
  34. "If it floats, it fights: Navy seeks distributed lethality," Breaking Defense, January 14, 2015.
  35. "More Prominence for India and the Indo-Pacific in the U.S. National Security Strategy," Council on foreign realtions, December 19, 2017.
  36. "Navy Conducts First Live Fire NIFC-CA Test with F-35," CHIPS, Semtember 14, 2016.
  37. "Opinion: Expanding the Distributed Lethality Web," USNI NEWS, June 10, 2016.
  38. "PACFLT's Swift: Amphib USS Wasp Will Deploy With Surface Action Group in 2017," USNINEWS, November 23, 2016.
  39. "U.S. Navy uses Raytheon's SM-6 to Destroy Ballistic Missile Target for the First Time," NAVY RECOGNITION, August 3, 2015.
  40. U.S. Indo-Pacific Command 홈페이지
  41. "Wasp completes first patrol in US 7th Fleet," Naval today.com, April 24, 2018.
  42. "美, 베트남 41년만 관계 정상화...中견제 의도," TV 조선 (2016. 5.24).
  43. "美항모, 종전 이후 첫 베트남 기항," 파이낸셜뉴스 (2018. 3. 5).
  44. "베트남 사상최초 림팩에 해군 관료 파견...친미행보 속도 붙나," 아주경제 (2018.6.27).
  45. "말라바 훈련 참가국, 상호운용성과 비국가조직 억제력 증명," Indo-Pacific Defense Forum (2017. 9. 7).
  46. "미.일.인도 3국 연합 해상훈련 '말라바르' 7일 괌에서 시작," 매일경제 (2018. 6. 6).
  47. "F-35B 이착륙 미 강습상륙함, 오늘 日사세보 기지 입항," 뉴시스 (2018. 1.14).
  48. "미국-인도 COMCASA 체결, 군사동맹수준 강화," 뉴스타운 (2018. 9. 8).
  49. "미, 최신예 연안전투함 태평양함대에 추가 배치," 연합뉴스 (2018.2.6.)
  50. "일본-인도 정상회담...모디 총리, 日집단자위권지지," SBS NEWS (2014. 9. 1.)
  51. "美, 태평양사령부 명칭 '인도태평양사령부'로 변경," 연합뉴스 (2018. 5.31.)
  52. "美 '인도.태평양 구상' 공식화... 아직 갈 길은 멀다," 국방일보 (2017.11.19).